Sensation Seeking Scale, Form V (SSS-V) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- A. I would not learn to fly an airplane.
- B. I would like to learn to fly an airplane.
- A. Excitingly unpredictable.
- B. Reliable and predictable.
- A. I like spending time in a familiar home setting.
- B. I get very restless if I have to stay at home for a while.
Sensation Seeking Scale, Form V (SSS-V) Test - Description and methodology of the test
If you are deciding whether to examine your preferences across travel, leisure, social settings, or uncertainty, the Sensation Seeking Scale, Form V (SSS-V) Test offers a structured set of choices to consider. This questionnaire helps someone considering this sensation seeking test decide whether its profile would aid reflection. Its results can highlight patterns across familiar activities and situations, helping you decide what to explore further.
What This Assessment Explores
SSS-V questionnaire covers routine, novelty, danger, freedom, and nonconformity.
- Boredom Susceptibility (BS), 0-10, measures intolerance of routine, repetition, uninteresting people, and change-related restlessness; Low 0-2, Moderate 3-6, High 7-10.
- Experience Seeking (ES), 0-10, measures novelty seeking through cognitive/sensory stimulation, travel, and nonconformity; Low 0-2, Moderate 3-6, High 7-10.
- Thrill and Adventure Seeking (TAS), 0-10, measures preference for physical risk, speed, danger, and extreme sports; Low 0-4, Moderate 5-8, High 9-10.
- Disinhibition, 0-10, measures social/sexual disinhibition in preference for parties, alcohol, and varied sexual partners; Low 0-2, Moderate 3-8, High 9-10.
- Sensation Seeking, 0-40, measures pursuit of novel, intense, varied sensations, including risk-taking; higher scores indicate stronger seeking, lower scores favor stability and predictability; Low 0-12, Moderate 13-25, High 26-40.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Respondents choose the statement that fits better from each pair, even when neither is perfect. The selected pattern produces separate dimension totals and an overall total. Read the result as a profile of preferences, not a single measure of daring.
The published Sensation Seeking Scale, Form V (SSS-V) is the closest reference for this questionnaire, which is conceptually consistent with it. Zuckerman’s model connects the trait with varied, novel, complex, and intense experiences, including willingness to accept physical or social risks. A later revision paper provides evidence relevant to the SSS-V’s development, while Gray and Wilson examined its reliability and validity in a UK sample.
Evidence from the published SSS-V helps interpret this online sensation seeking assessment but does not establish norms for its scores. The bands shown here are the questionnaire’s interpretation ranges; read them alongside circumstances and response style. Self-report can reflect current mood, memory, social desirability, and self-awareness; the profile is not a diagnosis and should be considered with broader context when important decisions arise.
- Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S. B. G., and Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(1), 139-149. 10.1037/0022-006X.46.1.139
- Zuckerman, M. (1996). Item revisions in the Sensation Seeking Scale Form V (SSS-V). Personality and Individual Differences, 20(4), 515. 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00195-6
- Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Gray, J. M., and Wilson, M. A. (2007). A detailed analysis of the reliability and validity of the sensation seeking scale in a UK sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(4), 641-651. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.019
Updated: