Social Interest Scale (SIS) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Imaginative
- Rational
- Helpful
- Quick-witted
- Skilled
- Compassionate toward others
Social Interest Scale (SIS) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People considering how they participate in groups, friendships, or shared responsibilities may use the Social Interest Scale (SIS) Test to organize that self-observation. The result can support reflection before making sense of recurring social choices or deciding which personal priorities deserve closer attention. As a social interest questionnaire, it produces a concise profile rather than a broad personality portrait.
What This Assessment Explores
Rather than measuring sociability alone, the assessment focuses on motivation to engage, cooperate, and respond constructively to other people. The paired alternatives contrast interpersonal qualities such as helpfulness, compassion, acceptance, forgiveness, tact, reliability, responsibility, and cooperation with qualities centered more on achievement, independence, intellect, originality, or competence. A result reflects the preferences expressed in these choices, not every aspect of behavior.
The result is organized under one scale:
- Social Interest: 0-15 indicates motivation for interaction and cooperation; Low (0-4) suggests less social interest, Moderate (5-10) indicates an intermediate level, and High (11-15) reflects stronger social interest.
In context, a social interest assessment helps readers consider whether their ideals lean toward involvement and concern for others. Higher social interest is associated with stable self-esteem and an internal locus of control, while life circumstances and stress may change it.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
The method uses paired-choice self-report items. Each asks which of two qualities the respondent would prefer to be or resemble, so answers show relative preference rather than frequency. Interpersonal qualities are set against cognitive, practical, emotional, and achievement-oriented qualities, making the task a comparison of value priorities.
The questionnaire presents a combined score, but it does not specify how much each alternative contributes, so that rule cannot be inferred from the paired wording. The displayed bands are the questionnaire's score-level categories.
Crandall's Social Interest Scale is the conceptual reference for this questionnaire. Later work connected the measure with peer ratings, interpersonal attraction, and adjustment-related implications, while Crandall's 1980 discussion placed social interest within Adlerian psychology as constructive participation with others. This online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that instrument, but it is not established as identical to the published instrument or standardized against a contemporary norm group.
When interpreting social interest test results, consider current stress, relationships, self-awareness, and socially desirable responding. A single preference profile can prompt reflection, but it cannot represent every social context or behavior.
- Crandall, J. E. (1975). A scale for social interest. Journal of Individual Psychology, 31(2), 187-195.
- Crandall, J. E. (1977). Further validation of the social interest scale: Peer ratings and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33(S1), 140-142. 10.1002/1097-4679(197701)33:1+<140::AID-JCLP2270330128>3.0.CO;2-X
- Crandall, J. E. (1980). Adler's concept of social interest: Theory, measurement, and implications for adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 481-495. 10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.481
Updated: