Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
self-determination

Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) Test

Take the online Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With 16 questions and an estimated completion time of 3 minutes, the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) Test examines whether a current activity is driven by interest, personal importance, external pressure, or futility. Results offer a concise motivational profile for self-reflection and understanding how you approach a task.
Questions: 163 minutes
Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS): situation and reply bubbles
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
28,855 views
2,774 completions
2,313 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,313 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

AmotivationA
Amotivation measures the extent to which a person feels a lack of intention or purpose to engage in the activity in the current situation.
example score23/28
23/28Highexample score
4 – 11Low
12 – 19Moderate
20 – 28High
A score of 23 falls in the High range, suggesting the activity currently feels less meaningful or worth the effort, with reduced intention to engage.
External RegulationER
Measures how strongly your engagement in the activity is driven by external demands, rewards, or avoidance of negative consequences.
example score10/28
10/28Low external regulationexample score
4 – 12Low external regulation
13 – 20Moderate external regulation
21 – 28High external regulation
A score of 10 indicates low external regulation, suggesting your involvement is only minimally influenced by outside pressure or rewards in this situation.
Identified RegulationIR
Identified regulation measures how strongly you engage in an activity because its goal feels personally important and aligned with your values.
example score26/28
26/28Highexample score
4 – 12Low
13 – 20Moderate
21 – 28High
A score of 26 indicates high identified regulation, suggesting you are currently driven mainly by the personally meaningful outcomes of the activity rather than external pressure or enjoyment of the process.
Intrinsic MotivationIM
Measures how strongly a person is motivated to engage in an activity for enjoyment and personal interest in the process itself.
example score16/28
16/28Moderateexample score
4 – 12Low
13 – 20Moderate
21 – 28High
A score of 16 indicates a moderate level of intrinsic motivation, suggesting some enjoyment and personal engagement in the activity alongside other possible drivers.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Students and learners
41%OF USERS
People in school, college, or courses use it to see what’s driving them to study or complete a specific assignment right now.
Managers and HR specialists
34%OF USERS
Leaders take it to understand what motivates employees in a particular task or project and adjust incentives or support.
Coaching and therapy clients
25%OF USERS
People working on goals use it to clarify whether their current effort comes from enjoyment, values, pressure, or a lack of purpose.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
AmotivationA
You?
Average10.1
Typical rangeTypical6.2 – 14
Possible4 – 28
External RegulationER
You?
Average14.7
Typical rangeTypical11 – 18.3
Possible4 – 28
Identified RegulationIR
You?
Average17.8
Typical rangeTypical14.1 – 21.5
Possible4 – 28
Intrinsic motivationIm
You?
Average11.5
Typical rangeTypical7.4 – 15.7
Possible4 – 28
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Not at all true
    • Untrue
    • Rather untrue
    • Neither true nor untrue
    • Rather true
    • True
    • Exactly true
    • Not at all true
    • Not true
    • Somewhat not true
    • Neither true nor false
    • Somewhat true
    • True
    • Completely true
    • Not at all true
    • Untrue
    • Somewhat untrue
    • Neither true nor untrue
    • Somewhat true
    • True
    • Exactly true
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) Test - Description and methodology of the test

self-determination
work motivation

People who want to understand why they persist with, avoid, or comply with a current activity can use this situational motivation questionnaire for focused self-reflection. The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) Test describes whether engagement is rooted in enjoyment, personal value, outside demands, or a sense that the activity is pointless. It suits anyone examining motivation in a specific task rather than seeking a permanent personality label.

What This Assessment Explores

Motivation is not treated as one quality. The SIMS motivation scale separates reasons for engaging in a particular activity: personal meaning, external pressure, perceived futility, and inherent enjoyment. Read the profile as situation-specific, since motives may differ across work, study, exercise, and other tasks.

The four displayed dimensions are:

  • Amotivation (4-28) measures absent intention or perceived futility; Low 4-11, Moderate 12-19, and High 20-28 indicate increasing levels.
  • External Regulation (4-28) measures engagement shaped by demands, rewards, or punishment; Low external regulation 4-12, Moderate external regulation 13-20, and High external regulation 21-28 show the result band.
  • Identified Regulation (4-28) measures whether the activity’s outcome feels personally important; Low 4-12, Moderate 13-20, and High 21-28 describe increasing endorsement.
  • Intrinsic Motivation (4-28) measures interest and enjoyment in the activity itself; Low 4-12, Moderate 13-20, and High 21-28 mark the displayed levels.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each item asks how well a reason for the activity fits the respondent, using a seven-point scale from low to high endorsement. Wording varies from “not at all true” to “untrue,” but each response indicates agreement. Themes include enjoyment, importance, obligation, choice, and perceived value.

The 16 items form four domains. Responses are grouped by motive, so results are reported separately rather than combined. Different motives can coexist: an activity may feel important while pursued under pressure.

The questionnaire’s item content and four-domain structure correspond to the published Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS), linking results to enjoyment, valued outcomes, external pressure, and low perceived meaning. Its interpretation follows self-determination theory associated with Ryan and Deci, which distinguishes enjoyment, valued outcomes, external contingencies, or low perceived meaning.

This situational motivation assessment is a snapshot of the selected context, not a fixed trait measure. Displayed bands are descriptive ranges in this questionnaire and should not be read as clinical cutoffs. Self-report may shift with mood, context, self-awareness, and interpretation, so read results alongside the circumstances.

Author: Edward L. Deci, Luc G. Pelletier, Richard M. Ryan, Robert J. Vallerand
Literature:
  • Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175-213. 10.1023/A:1005614228250
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press. 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment