Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Very often
- Not at all
- Slightly
- Moderately
- Quite strongly
- Very strongly
- More often than once a week
- Once a week
- One to three times a month
- Several times a year
- Less often
- Never
Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS) Test - Description and methodology of the test
For people considering how religion fits their lives, the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS) Test offers a structured personal profile. It can suit religious, questioning, and non-affiliated respondents seeking a religiosity assessment across several kinds of response. The result organizes self-reported tendencies for reflection without judging the truth of any belief.
What This Assessment Explores
This religious belief questionnaire maps involvement:
- Experience (1-5) measures individual/collective higher-reality contact; Low 1-2.1; Moderate 2.2-3.9; High 4-5.
- Personal Practice (1-5) measures individual prayer/meditation; Low 1-2.1; Moderate 2.2-3.9; High 4-5.
- Public Practice (1-5) measures communal religious activity; Low 1-2.1; Moderate 2.2-3.9; High 4-5.
- Ideological (1-5) measures certainty about transcendence; Low 1-2.1; Moderate 2.2-3.9; High 4-5.
- Intellectual (1-5) measures religious interest, knowledge, and reflection; Low 1-2; Moderate 2.1-3.8; High 3.9-5.
- Centrality of Religiosity Scale (1-5) measures religion’s integrated life role; higher scores indicate greater centrality, lower peripheral importance; Low centrality 1-2; Moderate 2.1-3.9; High 4-5.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
These 15 self-report items use five thematic areas: intellectual, ideological, experiential, personal, and public content. Some frequency questions offer six choices, while belief and importance prompts use five response levels for strength or relevance. This distinguishes occurrence from significance.
The online questionnaire does not document how its mixed response options are converted or combined. The displayed bands are classifications for these results; they do not establish population norms or theological correctness.
The main reference is Centrality of Religiosity Scale (Huber & Huber, 2012), which represents religious meaning through five channels. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that instrument, not presented as an adaptation. Its result is a religiosity profile, not a measure of religious truth.
Gheorghe (2019) reported good internal consistency and convergent and discriminative validity for a Romanian CRS-15 sample. That evidence concerns the related instrument and does not establish norms for this online presentation. Self-report scores can shift with current circumstances, interpretation, self-awareness, and candor.
- Huber, Stefan, and Odilo W. Huber. 2012. "The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS)." Religions 3 (3): 710-724. 10.3390/rel3030710
- Gheorghe, Huza. 2019. "The Psychometric Properties of a Romanian Version of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS 15)." Religions 10 (1): 11. 10.3390/rel10010011
Updated: