Circle of Willis Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Middle cerebral artery
- Anterior communicating artery
- Posterior communicating artery
- Proximal posterior cerebral artery
- Posterior communicating arteries
- Anterior cerebral arteries
- Middle cerebral arteries
- Posterior cerebral arteries
- Within the superior sagittal sinus
- Inside the lateral ventricles
- In the subarachnoid space at the base of the brain
- Between the skull and the scalp
Circle of Willis Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
This assessment suits learners who want to check their understanding of the arterial network at the brain’s base, from vessel names and segments to communicating pathways and clinical context. The Circle of Willis Quiz offers a focused knowledge check rather than a broad neurology examination. This focused knowledge check can show which topics deserve another review before class, revision, or discussion, helping learners plan targeted Circle of Willis revision.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire focuses on the arterial circle itself: vessel location, membership, communicating branches, A1/P1/P2 segments, common variants, collateral routes, aneurysm-prone junctions, and the role of CT angiography. Diagram and vessel-identification questions let learners practise identifying Circle of Willis structures and reviewing Circle of Willis anatomy, while short clinical scenarios connect names with how blood may move between major cerebral territories.
The displayed Circle of Willis Knowledge scale (0-16) is divided into these reader-facing bands:
- Foundations to build (0-6) shows that the basic vessels, connections, and purpose need further review.
- Developing knowledge (7-12) indicates a useful grasp with room to revisit variants, segment names, or applied circulation scenarios.
- Strong knowledge (13-16) reflects a well-developed understanding of the anatomy and its clinical context.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item presents an anatomy or applied-circulation prompt followed by four answer choices. Results are reported on the displayed 0-16 scale, while individual answer weighting is not specified. This is a knowledge assessment rather than a self-report trait measure, making this knowledge quiz useful for guided Circle of Willis study.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Riggs and Rupp (1963), whose work examined how anatomical variation in the arterial circle relates to potential collateral circulation; it is not presented as an adaptation or reproduction of that study. Eftekhar and colleagues (2006) report that Circle of Willis variants differ across populations, while Tarulli and colleagues (2014) show why these variants can matter when anterior communicating artery aneurysms are treated. Together, these sources support attention to structure, variation, and clinical context without validating the online scoring system.
The online score has no established norms or standardized validation reported for this assessment, and it is an educational score rather than a medical assessment. Performance may reflect prior teaching, terminology familiarity, and recognition of simplified scenarios; use the result to target further study.
- Riggs HE, Rupp C. Variation in Form of Circle of Willis: The Relation of the Variations to Collateral Circulation: Anatomic Analysis. Archives of Neurology. 1963;8(1):8-14. 10.1001/archneur.1963.00460010024002
- Eftekhar B, Dadmehr M, Ansari S, Ghodsi M, Nazparvar B, Ketabchi E. Are the distributions of variations of circle of Willis different in different populations? - Results of an anatomical study and review of literature. BMC Neurology. 2006;6:22. 10.1186/1471-2377-6-22
- Tarulli E, Sneade M, Clarke A, Molyneux AJ, Fox AJ. Effects of Circle of Willis Anatomic Variations on Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Coiled Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2014;35(8):1551-1555. 10.3174/ajnr.A3991
Updated: