Aromantic Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
Aromantic Test - Description and methodology of the test
People questioning how romance fits into their lives may use this aromantic test to organize experiences that can be difficult to name. Readers asking whether they are aromantic can use this am i aromantic quiz to examine attraction without forcing an identity label. It is suited to readers seeking clearer language for experiences that do not fit familiar romantic expectations.
What This Assessment Explores
Romantic experience is not treated as a single yes-or-no category. This aromantic quiz separates how often attraction occurs, whether it depends on closeness or trust, and how appealing dating feels. The result is a profile of these patterns for readers seeking clearer language around romance.
The three displayed dimensions are:
- Conditional Romantic Attraction (0-20) measures whether feelings depend on bonds, trust, time, or rare circumstances; higher scores are more conditional. Less conditional 0-6; Somewhat conditional 7-13; Highly conditional 14-20.
- Romance/Dating Interest (0-30) measures interest in dating, romantic gestures, and relationship structures; higher scores show stronger interest. Low interest 0-10; Moderate interest 11-20; High interest 21-30.
- Romantic Attraction Intensity (0-40) measures how often and strongly crushes, love, or romantic bonding occur; higher scores indicate more frequent or intense attraction. Low attraction 0-13; Moderate attraction 14-26; High attraction 27-40.
Methodology and Evidence Base
The response format offers agreement choices such as Strongly disagree, Disagree, Not sure, and Agree; the items address attraction, dating, gestures, security, jealousy, and partnership. Viewed as an aromantic spectrum test, it reflects variation across several dimensions.
The result reports three displayed scale scores, each read through its stated range and band. No weighting rule, population norms, or clinical cutoffs are stated, so the result describes a response pattern rather than a diagnosis. This is not an aroace test: it focuses on romantic attraction and romance-related interest, not sexual attraction.
Miyake and Hiramori (2023) describe romantic orientation among aromantic and asexual-spectrum people as multidimensional, providing the closest conceptual comparison. Antonsen et al. (2020) distinguish romantic-attraction experiences in asexuality research. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the multidimensional patterns described by both works but is not an adaptation or standardized reproduction of either work, and no validation is claimed for this online version.
Self-report can shift with current relationships, memory, self-awareness, and pressure to choose a socially expected answer. Interpret the profile as a reflection aid, particularly when your experiences vary across time or relationships.
- Miyake, Daijiro, and Daiki Hiramori. (2023). Multidimensionality of Romantic Orientation among the Aromantic/Asexual Spectrum in Japan. Gender and Sexuality, 18, 1-26. 10.34577/00005298
- Antonsen, Amy N., Bozena Zdaniuk, Morag Yule, and Lori A. Brotto. (2020). Ace and Aro: Understanding Differences in Romantic Attractions Among Persons Identifying as Asexual. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(5), 1615-1630. 10.1007/s10508-019-01600-1