PHQ-9 Test


How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not at all
- Several days
- More than half the days
- Nearly every day
- Not at all
- Several days
- More than half the days
- Nearly every day
- Not at all
- Several days
- More than half the days
- Nearly every day
PHQ-9 Test - Description and methodology of the test
/https://cdn.freudly.ai/media/tests/2058/image/1765238945_day_image_20251209_000905.png)
People who want a structured snapshot of recent depressive symptoms can use this questionnaire to organize changes in mood, motivation, sleep, energy, appetite, concentration, self-worth, movement, and safety-related thinking. As a phq test, it is most useful for readers deciding whether a recent pattern deserves closer attention. The phq9 test turns those responses into a focused indication of symptom severity, not a fixed description of the person.
What This Test Measures
The questions focus on recent experiences that commonly accompany depression rather than on a single emotion. They cover reduced interest, low mood, sleep, fatigue, appetite, self-evaluation, concentration, psychomotor change, and thoughts of death or self-harm. Together, these themes show what a phq 9 test can capture for someone reflecting on mood-related difficulties.
The result brings together these areas:
- Mood and interest indicate whether pleasure, motivation, or hope has diminished.
- Sleep, energy, and appetite reflect physical and behavioral changes that may accompany low mood.
- Self-worth and concentration show how depressive symptoms can affect thinking and self-evaluation.
- Movement captures noticeable slowing or restlessness, which may alter everyday functioning.
- Safety-related thoughts identify experiences involving death or self-harm and deserve careful attention.
- Depression Severity (0-27) summarizes depressive symptom severity; displayed bands are None to Mild 0-9, Moderate 10-14, and Moderately Severe to Severe 15-27.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item asks how often a symptom occurred during the past two weeks, using four ordered choices: Not at all, Several days, More than half the days, and Nearly every day. In this phq9 questionnaire, responses are combined into one overall severity score, with more frequent symptoms contributing to a higher total; the form does not produce separate diagnostic subscales.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with PHQ-9 (Kroenke, Spitzer, and Williams, 2001), a published self-report depression measure within the broader Patient Health Questionnaire system. The earlier PHQ primary-care study established the wider self-report framework, while a later systematic review examined the depressive scale alongside related symptom measures. This online presentation is not a separately normed or independently validated adaptation.
Interpretation reflects symptom burden during the stated time window. Current stress, recall, self-awareness, and willingness to disclose can influence answers, so the score is best read as a structured indicator rather than a diagnosis. Persistent impairment or safety-related thoughts require attention beyond the questionnaire result.
- Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606-613. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
- Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & the Patient Health Questionnaire Primary Care Study Group. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. JAMA, 282(18), 1737-1744. 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737
- Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2010). The Patient Health Questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: A systematic review. General Hospital Psychiatry, 32(4), 345-359. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006