Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
ethnopsychology

Social Dominance Orientation Scale Test

Take the online Social Dominance Orientation Scale Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Social Dominance Orientation Scale Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand attitudes toward social hierarchy across groups in about 2 minutes. Ten quick items deliver reliable, research-ready insight to support education, counseling, or DEI work.
Start Online Test
Questions: 102 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
15,231 view
1,471 completion
1,234 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
3/7
Anti-Egalitarianism (AE)
Measures the extent to which a person rejects equality between social groups and endorses group-based hierarchy.
Egalitarian
Mixed/Moderate
Anti-egalitarian
12: Egalitarian | 2.14.4: Mixed/Moderate | 4.57: Anti-egalitarian
A score of 3 falls in the Mixed/Moderate range, suggesting a generally balanced stance with limited endorsement of group-based inequality.
example score
4/7
Social Dominance Orientation (SDO)
This scale measures the extent to which a person supports or rejects social hierarchy and inequality between groups.
Egalitarian
Mixed/Neutral
Hierarchy-supporting
12.3: Egalitarian | 2.44.4: Mixed/Neutral | 4.57: Hierarchy-supporting
A score of 4 falls in the Mixed/Neutral range, suggesting a moderate or context-dependent stance toward social hierarchy and group-based inequality.
example score
3/7
Dominance (D)
Measures the extent to which a person endorses group-based hierarchy and the superiority of some groups over others.
Low dominance endorsement
Moderate dominance endorsement
High dominance endorsement
12.3: Low dominance endorsement | 2.44.8: Moderate dominance endorsement | 4.97: High dominance endorsement
A score of 3 falls in the moderate range, suggesting a mixed or situationally dependent stance toward group-based dominance rather than strong support or strong rejection.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Social science students
41%OF USERS
They take it to explore how beliefs about social hierarchy relate to attitudes toward different groups in class projects or research.
Diversity and inclusion professionals
34%OF USERS
They use it to understand baseline views on group inequality and tailor training or conflict-prevention efforts.
Curious self-reflectors
25%OF USERS
They take it to see whether they lean toward equality or hierarchy when thinking about race, gender, class, and other groups.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Antiegalitarianism (A)
Antiegalitarianism (A)
Average
4.4
Normal range
3.55.2
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Social Dominance Orientation Scale (SDOS)
Social Dominance Orientation Scale (SDOS)
Average
3.1
Normal range
2.24.1
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Dominance (D)
Dominance (D)
Average
3.7
Normal range
2.84.5
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

In contemporary society, there are many different groups. Please consider how relationships between different groups of people should be structured. Indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below. There are no “right” or “wrong” answers. The best response is your personal opinion. You may be assured that, whatever your opinion, many people will agree with you, while others will hold a different point of view.
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Unsure
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Not sure
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment

Social Dominance Orientation Scale Test - Symptoms and Signs

ethnopsychology
intergroup relations
social attitudes

This brief self-report measure assesses individual differences in preferences for group-based hierarchy and inequality. The Social Dominance Orientation Scale is used to quantify endorsement of social hierarchies across social groups and contexts.

Respondents rate their agreement with statements reflecting support for dominance of some groups over others and opposition to equality-oriented policies. The measure contains 10 items and typically takes about 2 minutes to complete; it is commonly used in research and applied settings to examine intergroup attitudes and related social beliefs.

In interpreting results, higher scores generally indicate stronger endorsement of hierarchical group relations, whereas lower scores suggest greater support for egalitarian relations. The Social Dominance Orientation Scale was developed by Felicia Pratto and Jim Sidanius and is intended to be administered and interpreted within appropriate ethical and cultural considerations.

Author: Felicia Pratto, Jim Sidanius
Literature: Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment