Effort Stress Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Effort Stress Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who feel driven to keep proving themselves at work may use the Effort Stress Test to examine whether achievement pressure is becoming a persistent source of strain. It is suited to adults reflecting on workplace demands, emotional tension, sleep, appetite, and related habits. As a workplace strain assessment, it offers a focused result that can help identify patterns worth observing in daily life.
What This Assessment Explores
Items cover irritation, perceived hostility from colleagues, feeling undervalued by a supervisor, early waking, unexplained fear, cravings, appetite, memory, changes in when you feel like working, and a partner's comment about thinking and sex. These reported experiences contribute to the result.
For this assessment, Effort Stress refers to stress associated with excessive striving, workaholism, and occupational strain. In this work-related stress test, the result indicates the level of that stress; a high score may indicate overwork and emotional burnout without establishing workaholism itself. Results are Low (0-33), Moderate (34-66), or High (67-100). The thematic groups are:
- Achievement pressure reflects persistent striving that may be creating strain.
- Interpersonal tension shows how irritation or feeling undervalued enters the result.
- Stress-related signs capture changes in sleep, appetite, memory, fear, cravings, and work motivation.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item uses yes-or-no responses, making the format direct but leaving little room for frequency, severity, or context. The response pattern becomes one displayed result; because individual weighting is not specified, points per answer should not be inferred from the bands.
The Effort-Reward Imbalance model and the published Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire provide conceptual context for this effort stress questionnaire, while this online questionnaire is not presented as a standardized adaptation of that instrument. The 2004 European comparison and 2014 psychometric study concern related effort-and-reward measurement rather than standardizing this online questionnaire. Karasek's 1979 demand-and-decision-latitude model adds a complementary account of mental strain.
As an online self-report, the result is best read against current circumstances. Mood, memory, social expectations, and temporary workload can shape self-report, and this version has no stated norms for clinical interpretation. A high result points to patterns worth examining alongside working conditions, recovery, and relationships.
- Siegrist, J. (1996). Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(1), 27-41. 10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27
- Siegrist, J., Starke, D., Chandola, T., Godin, I., Marmot, M., Niedhammer, I., and Peter, R. (2004). The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Social Science & Medicine, 58(8), 1483-1499. 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00351-4
- Siegrist, J., Li, J., and Montano, D. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire. Düsseldorf University.
- Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285-308. 10.2307/2392498
Updated: