Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree somewhat
- Neutral
- Agree somewhat
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree somewhat
- Neutral
- Agree somewhat
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) Test - Description and methodology of the test
Designed for healthcare professionals and teams, this assessment examines how communication, leadership, workload, and organizational practices shape perceptions of safe care. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) Test gives a structured profile of workplace factors that staff experience in daily practice. As a safety culture assessment, it can help a unit discuss strengths, friction points, and priorities for improvement.
What This Assessment Explores
The patient safety questionnaire covers scales:
- Safety Attitudes (41-205) measures safety adherence: Needs improvement 41-95/Developing 96-150/Strong 151-205.
- Teamwork Climate (6-30) measures collaboration: Needs improvement 6-16/Adequate 17-23/Strong 24-30.
- Safety Climate (7-35) measures trust: Low 7-16/Moderate 17-25/High 26-35.
- Job Satisfaction (5-25) measures fulfillment: Low 5-12/Moderate 13-19/High 20-25.
- Stress Recognition (4-20) measures stress management: Low 4-9/Moderate 10-15/High 16-20.
- Perceptions of Unit Management (5-25) measures support: Low confidence 5-14/Mixed confidence 15-19/High confidence 20-25.
- Perceptions of Hospital Management (5-25) measures policies: Low 5-11/Moderate 12-18/High 19-25.
- Working Conditions (4-20) measures adequacy: Needs improvement 4-10/Adequate 11-15/Strong 16-20.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
This is a structured self-report survey. Statements cover speaking up, error handling, support, workload, fatigue, management, staffing, training, and collaboration. Respondents choose among five agreement options, from strongly disagree to strongly agree, with a neutral option where shown. Negatively worded items mean raw agreement cannot be interpreted as a higher or lower score without the questionnaire's scoring key.
Separate domain scores are reported rather than a single pass/fail judgment, and each score is interpreted through its displayed band. The questionnaire does not specify item weighting or reverse-coding, so readers should not infer an overall total or cutoff beyond the displayed bands. Responses may vary with current workload, local events, and willingness to disclose concerns.
Published work on the SAQ provides psychometric and benchmarking evidence for that established instrument. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with it, while its online form is not established as reproducing the instrument's validation sample, norms, or reliability estimates. Its domains are relevant to healthcare safety culture, especially teamwork, stress, and safety perceptions, but that relevance does not make the online form a standardized adaptation.
- Sexton, J. B., Helmreich, R. L., Neilands, T. B., Rowan, K., Vella, K., Boyden, J., Roberts, P. R., and Thomas, E. J. (2006). The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Services Research, 6, 44. 10.1186/1472-6963-6-44
- Sexton, J. B., Thomas, E. J., and Helmreich, R. L. (2000). Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ, 320(7237), 745-749. 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.745
Updated: