Career Orientations Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- 1: Not at all important
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10: Extremely important
- 1: Not at all important
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10: Extremely important
- 1: Not at all important
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10: Extremely important
Career Orientations Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People considering a change, choosing between roles, or clarifying what they want from work can use the Career Orientations Questionnaire Test to examine the values behind their decisions. As a career orientation assessment, it organizes priorities into a profile of preferred responsibilities, working conditions, and sources of satisfaction, helping readers compare possible directions with the kind of working life they want to build.
What This Assessment Explores
These questions compare motives behind roles, rewards, and working conditions. A career anchors test result shows tensions among ambition, personal life, security, and independence.
The result groups these dimensions:
- Lifestyle Integration (5–50) measures work–life balance.
- Service (5–50) measures helping others and social contribution; Entrepreneurship (5–50) measures venture creation and risk-taking.
- Professional Competence (5–50) measures mastery and recognition; Challenge (5–50) measures difficult competition.
- Stability (5–50) measures predictable continuity; Autonomy (5–50) measures independence; Managerial Competence (5–50) measures leadership and coordination.
- Vertical Career Orientation (0–100) measures upward advancement; Horizontal Career Orientation (0–100) measures specialization; Orientation Toward Conditions (15–150) measures secure, balanced work.
Labels include Work-first, Balanced, Lifestyle-first, Lower service focus, Moderate service focus, High service focus, Lower, Moderate, High, Strong, Low focus on specialization, Balanced orientation, and Strong lateral-career orientation; they show relative emphasis, not career ranking.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item asks the respondent to rate a career statement on a ten-point continuum. The representative questions use two response frames: importance, from Not at all important to Extremely important, and agreement, from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree. Responses are combined into separate orientation scores rather than one overall total, allowing a person to see which motives are more prominent.
The closest named source is Career Anchors Self-Assessment (Schein & Van Maanen, 2013), which presents career anchors as enduring preferences guiding work decisions. Schein (1990) provides the earlier conceptual account of these values. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that framework, but it should not be assumed to reproduce the published instrument’s exact wording, scoring, or norms.
Leong, Rosenberg, and Chong (2014) evaluated the psychometric performance of Schein’s Career Orientations Inventory, while Danziger, Rachman-Moore, and Valency (2008) examined its construct validity. Those studies support the relevance of the career-anchor model, not automatic validation of this online version. As a career values assessment, its scores are best read as descriptive indications of current priorities. Because responses are self-reported and the online version has no independently stated norms, scores may shift with context and are descriptive rather than diagnostic.
- Schein, Edgar H., & Van Maanen, John. (2013). Career Anchors: The Changing Nature of Careers Self Assessment (4th ed.). Pfeiffer. ISBN 978-1-118-45576-0.
- Schein, Edgar H. (1990). Career Anchors: Discovering Your Real Values (Rev. ed.). Pfeiffer & Company. ISBN 0883900300.
- Leong, Frederick T. L., Rosenberg, Stanley D., & Chong, SinHui. (2014). A Psychometric Evaluation of Schein’s (1985) Career Orientations Inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(3), 524–538. 10.1177/1069072713498685
- Danziger, Nira, Rachman-Moore, Dalia, & Valency, Rony. (2008). The Construct Validity of Schein’s Career Anchors Orientation Inventory. Career Development International, 13(1), 7–19. 10.1108/13620430810849506
Updated: