Gifted and Talented Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- You almost never observe this characteristic
- You observe this characteristic from time to time
- You observe this characteristic quite often
- You observe this characteristic almost all the time
- You almost never observe this characteristic
- You observe this characteristic from time to time
- You observe this characteristic fairly often
- You observe this characteristic almost all of the time
- You almost never observe this characteristic
- You observe this characteristic from time to time
- You observe this characteristic fairly often
- You observe this characteristic almost all the time
Gifted and Talented Test - Description and methodology of the test
Parents, teachers, and other adults who regularly observe a child can use this gifted and talented test to organize impressions of learning and behavior. It is intended to show how consistently particular strengths appear in everyday situations, not to reduce a child to one label. The resulting profile can help adults identify areas to discuss in enrichment or school planning.
What This Assessment Explores
Items cover observable learning, behavior, originality, persistence, social confidence, and responsibility. The profile supports school enrichment discussions:
- Creative Characteristics (10-40) measures imagination, originality, and new ideas; Lower creativity 10-19, Moderate creativity 20-29, and Higher creativity 30-40.
- Leadership Characteristics (5-20) measures organizing, influence, and responsibility; Lower leadership expression 5-10, Moderate leadership expression 11-15, and High leadership expression 16-20.
- Motivational Characteristics (5-20) measures intrinsic drive, persistence, and sustained interest; Low 5-9, Moderate 10-14, and High 15-20.
- Cognitive Characteristics (5-20) measures curiosity, learning interest, independent information seeking, and analytical thinking; Lower 5-9, Moderate 10-15, and Higher 16-20.
The profile can reveal uneven strengths: a child may show intense curiosity without taking charge in groups, or originality alongside sensitivity and self-criticism. These results describe reported tendencies in familiar situations, helping an adult consider enrichment, classroom fit, and areas where a child may need different support.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item describes an observable characteristic, and four response options range from almost never to almost always observed. Ratings work best when they reflect recurring situations rather than one unusually good or difficult day.
Responses form four scale totals, producing a multidimensional profile rather than one intelligence score. Higher totals mean the relevant characteristics were reported more consistently; the displayed bands organize results but do not establish universal cutoffs.
It is conceptually consistent with SRBCSS, a structured approach to adult ratings of learning, motivation, creativity, and leadership. The 2002 technical manual addresses administration and interpretation for the SRBCSS family, and the 2009 study examined reliability and factor structure in four newer scales. These sources support the framework, not automatic validation of this online questionnaire.
The profile can guide enrichment planning around classroom fit and further observation. Results are most useful when compared with school observations and the child’s actual opportunities to demonstrate a trait.
Observer ratings can vary with honesty, memory, current context, and self-awareness, so the profile is descriptive rather than diagnostic.
- Renzulli, J. S., & Hartman, R. K. (1971). Scale for rating behavioral characteristics of superior students. Exceptional Children, 38(3), 243-248. 10.1177/001440297103800309
- Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. L. (2002). Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students: Technical and Administration Manual, Revised Edition. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press. ISBN 0-936386-90-8
- Renzulli, J. S., Siegle, D., Reis, S. M., Gavin, M. K., & Reed, R. E. S. (2009). An investigation of the reliability and factor structure of four new scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(1), 84-108. 10.1177/1932202X0902100105
Updated: