Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
impulsivity

Pathological Liar Test

Pathological Liar Test: Am I a Compulsive Liar? - FreudlyPathological Liar Test: Evaluate compulsive lying patterns. Free screening with behavioral analysis. Not diagnostic – seek professional help.en
With 77 questions and an estimated completion time of 10 minutes, this pathological liar test explores how often lying occurs, how difficult it feels to control, and what emotional or relationship costs may follow. Your result can support honest self-reflection and help you notice patterns affecting trust, stress, and communication.
Questions: 7710 minutes
Pathological Liar Test: situation and reply bubbles
March 25, 2026March 25, 2026Material has been updatedMarch 25, 2026Material has been published
8,396 views
1,147 completions
662 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
662 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Compulsion & ControlC&C
Measures how automatic, impulsive, or difficult to resist lying feels, including how hard it is to stop once it begins.
example score5/30
5/30Low compulsionexample score
0 – 10Low compulsion
11 – 20Moderate compulsion
21 – 30High compulsion
A score of 5 suggests lying usually feels more voluntary than automatic, with relatively strong perceived control and ability to stop.
Impact & ConsequencesI&C
Assesses the emotional and relationship costs associated with lying, such as guilt, anxiety about being caught, conflict, and loss of trust.
example score26/30
26/30High impactexample score
0 – 10Low impact
11 – 20Moderate impact
21 – 30High impact
A score of 26 falls in the High impact range, suggesting lying is linked to substantial guilt/anxiety and noticeable strain on trust and relationships.
Lying FrequencyLF
Measures how often you report lying across everyday situations, from small omissions to significant falsehoods.
example score35/40
35/40High frequencyexample score
0 – 13Low frequency
14 – 27Moderate frequency
28 – 40High frequency
A score of 35 falls in the High frequency range, suggesting you report lying in many day-to-day situations and that it may feel like a well-established habit.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Worried About Habitual Lying
41%OF USERS
People who notice they lie often (even about small things) and want to understand triggers, guilt, and whether it feels hard to stop.
Relationship Trust Repair
34%OF USERS
People dealing with conflict after being caught in lies who want clarity on patterns, consequences, and steps to rebuild honesty.
Image and Anxiety Managers
25%OF USERS
People who lie to avoid embarrassment, rejection, or punishment and want to see how fear, self-esteem, and impulse control play a role.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Compulsion & ControlC&C
You?
Average21.6
Typical rangeTypical17 – 26.3
Possible0 – 30
Impact & ConsequencesI&C
You?
Average19.5
Typical rangeTypical14.6 – 24.4
Possible0 – 30
Lying FrequencyLF
You?
Average27.6
Typical rangeTypical20.2 – 35
Possible0 – 40
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Pathological Liar Test - Description and methodology of the test

impulsivity

For people who suspect that dishonesty has become repetitive, difficult to interrupt, or costly to relationships, this pathological liar test offers a focused way to examine the pattern. It is intended for someone who notices recurring lies and wants to separate frequency from the feeling of being pulled toward them. This compulsive liar test may help organize those experiences into areas for reflection rather than a single global judgment.

What This Assessment Explores

The questionnaire examines how often lying occurs, how controllable it feels, and what emotional or interpersonal costs accompany it. Items address reflexive or stress-linked dishonesty, failed efforts to stop, anxiety, shame, conflict, damaged trust, and relationship strain. The result shows which pattern is most prominent.

The displayed dimensions are:

  • Compulsion & Control (0-30) measures automaticity and resistance: Low compulsion 0-10, Moderate compulsion 11-20, High compulsion 21-30.
  • Impact & Consequences (0-30) measures emotional and relational cost: Low impact 0-10, Moderate impact 11-20, High impact 21-30.
  • Lying Frequency (0-40) measures reported everyday frequency: Low frequency 0-13, Moderate frequency 14-27, High frequency 28-40.

Together, they separate frequency, perceived loss of control, and harm. As a pathological lying questionnaire, it emphasizes patterns rather than isolated incidents.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Responses use agreement choices from strongly disagree to agree, frequency choices from never to often, and recent-occurrence choices from not at all to many times. The combination covers both general tendencies and situations.

Scores are reported separately for the three dimensions. Each response contributes to its relevant area, while the displayed bands organize the result; the questionnaire does not establish a diagnostic total. Scores describe reported experiences, not verified behavior.

The content is conceptually consistent with the Pathological Lying Inventory (Hart et al., 2024), a published measure of pathological lying, distress, and social dysfunction. This online questionnaire is not a direct administration or adaptation of that instrument. Curtis and Hart (2020) offer a framework in which pathological lying is persistent, pervasive, often compulsive behavior linked with distress or impaired functioning. As a pathological lying assessment, this questionnaire applies that focus to self-reported urges, frequency, and consequences.

No standardised norms or diagnostic cut-offs are established here. Memory, self-awareness, current stress, and impression management can affect self-report, so interpretation should consider the pattern across dimensions and situations behind the answers.

Literature:
  • Hart, C. L., Curtis, D. A., & Terrizzi, J. A. (2024). Development and validation of the pathological lying inventory. Current Psychology, 43, 21218-21228. 10.1007/s12144-024-05900-1
  • Curtis, D. A., & Hart, C. L. (2020). Pathological lying: Theoretical and empirical support for a diagnostic entity. Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice, 2(2), 62-69. 10.1176/appi.prcp.20190046

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment