Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
communication

Am I Toxic Quiz

Am I Toxic Quiz: 10 Signs of a Toxic Personality - FreudlyAm I Toxic Quiz: Evaluate your behavior patterns honestly. Free self-assessment with growth insights. Start now.en
With 60 questions and a completion time of about 10 minutes, the Am I Toxic Quiz explores patterns in accountability, boundaries, respect, and potentially harmful relationship habits. Your result can highlight areas for honest self-reflection and practical changes in how you handle conflict and repair.
Questions: 6010 minutes
Am I Toxic Quiz: sample question card
March 25, 2026March 25, 2026Material has been updatedMarch 25, 2026Material has been published
8,110 views
4,650 completions
613 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
613 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Accountability & RepairA&R
Assesses how consistently you take responsibility, offer effective apologies, and follow through on behavior change after conflict.
example score10/20
10/20Developing repairexample score
0 – 7Low repair
8 – 14Developing repair
15 – 20Strong repair
A score of 10 suggests you sometimes own your part and try to make amends, but follow-through or accountability may be inconsistent when emotions run high.
Boundaries & RespectB&R
Measures how clearly and consistently you set boundaries and respect others’ autonomy while communicating needs directly.
example score16/20
16/20Healthy Boundariesexample score
0 – 9Boundary Strain
10 – 14Mixed Consistency
15 – 20Healthy Boundaries
A score of 16 suggests you generally maintain healthy boundaries and mutual respect, with only occasional moments of overstepping or unclear limits.
Toxic Pattern IntensityTPI
Measures how often and how strongly potentially harmful interpersonal habits (e.g., defensiveness, control, passive-aggression, jealousy) show up in your relationships.
example score20/40
20/40Moderateexample score
0 – 13Low
14 – 26Moderate
27 – 40High
A score of 20 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting these patterns show up sometimes and may impact relationships in specific situations or triggers.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Post-Conflict Self-Checkers
41%OF USERS
They take it after a fight or tense moment to see whether their reactions (defensiveness, blame, sarcasm) may be contributing to the problem.
Relationship Pattern Spotters
34%OF USERS
They’ve noticed recurring issues like jealousy, control, or poor boundaries across relationships and want a clearer picture of what they might be doing.
Growth-Minded Communicators
25%OF USERS
They generally feel stable but want an honest check on blind spots and practical next steps for healthier communication and accountability.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Accountability & RepairA&R
You?
Average11.8
Typical rangeTypical8.1 – 15.5
Possible0 – 20
Boundaries & RespectB&R
You?
Average8.3
Typical rangeTypical5.2 – 11.5
Possible0 – 20
Toxic Pattern IntensityTPI
You?
Average22
Typical rangeTypical15 – 29
Possible0 – 40
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Am I Toxic Quiz - Description and methodology of the test

communication
relationships

For readers who want to understand how their behavior affects close relationships, the Am I Toxic Quiz organizes responses around accountability, boundaries, and harmful interaction patterns, showing where strengths and recurring difficulties cluster. This toxic test assesses potentially harmful interpersonal habits through questions about responsibility, respect, and conflict behavior. Its resulting dimensions allow comparison across conflicts and relationships.

What This Assessment Explores

The questionnaire asks whether someone can accept limits, state needs directly, respond to criticism, and repair harm without shifting blame. It also covers control, guilt-tripping, silent treatment, jealousy, retaliation, harsh criticism, and minimizing feelings. The questionnaire serves as a toxic person test by examining behaviors that can make close relationships toxic, showing whether difficulties cluster around repair, respect for autonomy, or broader habits across relationships and conflicts.

The three result dimensions are:

  • Accountability & Repair (0-20) measures responsibility, effective apology, and follow-through; higher scores indicate stronger repair. Low repair: 0-7; Developing repair: 8-14; Strong repair: 15-20.
  • Boundaries & Respect (0-20) measures clear limits and respect for autonomy; higher scores indicate healthier respect. Boundary Strain: 0-9; Mixed Consistency: 10-14; Healthy Boundaries: 15-20.
  • Toxic Pattern Intensity (0-40) measures frequency and strength of harmful habits; higher scores indicate greater intensity. Low: 0-13; Moderate: 14-26; High: 27-40.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each item is a statement, and the respondent chooses Strongly disagree, Disagree, Not sure, or Agree. This self-report format does not observe conduct or verify another person's account. Responses combine into the displayed dimensions, but point allocation, reverse-keying, and the item-to-scale map are not documented, so no extra scoring rule should be inferred.

The closest conceptual anchor is the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse (Murphy & Hoover, 1999), a multifactorial approach relevant to control, punishment, belittling, and emotional pressure. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work, not an adaptation. Its focus on autonomy and power also overlaps with PICS (Neilands et al., 2019), while conflict behaviors are comparable with CTS2 (Straus et al., 1996).

The questionnaire is an online self-report tool without established standardization or population norms. Current conflict, self-awareness, defensiveness, and impression management may affect responses, so the displayed bands describe the pattern captured by this questionnaire rather than universal thresholds. The result from this toxic trait test can identify specific toxic traits or habits to examine, giving the reader concrete behaviors to change.

Literature:
  • Christopher M. Murphy and Sharon A. Hoover. (1999). Measuring Emotional Abuse in Dating Relationships as a Multifactorial Construct. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 39-53. 10.1891/0886-6708.14.1.39
  • Torsten B. Neilands, Shari L. Dworkin, Deepalika Chakravarty, Chadwick K. Campbell, Patrick A. Wilson, Anu Manchikanti Gomez, Kirk K. Grisham, and Colleen C. Hoff. (2019). Development and Validation of the Power Imbalance in Couples Scale (PICS). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(3), 763-779. 10.1007/s10508-018-1190-y
  • Murray A. Straus, Sherry L. Hamby, Sue Boney-McCoy, and David B. Sugarman. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and Preliminary Psychometric Data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283-316. 10.1177/019251396017003001

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment