Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand how reward anticipation and present enjoyment shape everyday experience may use this questionnaire for structured self-reflection. The Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) Test focuses on whether pleasure feels available before a positive event, during it, or in both phases. This distinction helps readers notice differences between motivation, expectation, sensory enjoyment, and immediate emotional response.
What This Assessment Explores
Pleasure is not a single experience here: the questionnaire separates anticipation of a future reward from enjoyment during a pleasant event. Items cover looking forward to films, meals, holidays, and other activities, alongside tastes, smells, sounds, touch, scenery, warmth, and soothing sensations. The anticipatory pleasure test can therefore help readers reflect on motivation and everyday positive affect.
The displayed profile contains two dimensions:
- Anticipatory Pleasure (1-6) measures positive affect while expecting future rewards. Bands are Low 1-2.8, Moderate 2.9-4.4, and High 4.5-6; lower results may be associated with anhedonia.
- Consummatory Pleasure (1-6) measures positive affect during a pleasant event or reward. Bands are Lower in-the-moment pleasure 1-3.6, Moderate in-the-moment pleasure 3.6-5.3, and Higher in-the-moment pleasure 5.3-6.
Together, they show whether anticipation and present enjoyment appear similar or distinct; cultural and personal differences can shape both.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement uses a six-point agreement response, from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree. The wording moves between imagined future rewards and direct sensory or emotional enjoyment, so respondents rate both expectation and present-moment feeling rather than a single general mood.
As an online TEPS questionnaire, it uses self-report. The published TEPS instrument is the conceptual anchor: it separates future-oriented reward response from in-the-moment enjoyment. This questionnaire presents that two-domain construct online, while later TEPS studies provide evidence from their own samples rather than validation of this exact scoring presentation.
Responses are grouped into component scores, but the item-level weighting or calculation rule is not stated for this questionnaire. The displayed bands are descriptive and are not presented as population norms or diagnostic cutoffs; they summarize where the two kinds of pleasure fall within the questionnaire's scoring framework. Current mood, context, memory, cultural habits, and willingness to answer candidly can shift self-report, while a single profile cannot capture every influence on reward experience. It is most useful as a starting point for noticing patterns and deciding what merits closer reflection.
- Gard, David E., Marja Germans Gard, Ann M. Kring, and Oliver P. John. "Anticipatory and consummatory components of the experience of pleasure: A scale development study." Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 1086-1102, 2006. 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.001
- Ho, Paul M., Andrew J. Cooper, Phillip J. Hall, and Luke D. Smillie. "Factor structure and construct validity of the temporal experience of pleasure scales." Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(2), 200-208, 2015. 10.1080/00223891.2014.940625
- Chan, Raymond C. K., Yan-fang Shi, Man-kin Lai, Yu-na Wang, Ya Wang, and Ann M. Kring. "The Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS): Exploration and Confirmation of Factor Structure in a Healthy Chinese Sample." PLOS ONE, 7(4), e35352, 2012. 10.1371/journal.pone.0035352
Updated: