Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
relationships

Am I a Stalker Quiz

Am I a Stalker Quiz - Free Physical Contact Test - FreudlyTake a free am i a stalker quiz to explore whether you are a stalker and understand what it means. Quick, no sign-up needed. Start now!en
With 15 questions, the Am I a Stalker Quiz takes about 10 minutes to complete. It explores reported contact, monitoring, pursuit, and responses to personal boundaries, helping you reflect on patterns that may need to stop and identify practical next steps for respecting consent and creating distance.
Questions: 1510 minutes
Am I a Stalker: situation and reply bubbles
July 22, 2026July 22, 2026Material has been updatedJuly 22, 2026Material has been published
6,403 views
589 completions
496 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
496 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Monitoring and Information AccessMaIA
This scale reflects self-reported non-consensual monitoring or accessing information about another person (e.g., tracking, checking, or searching for updates) despite boundaries.
example score7/15
7/15Action warrantedexample score
0No monitoring endorsed
1 – 2Boundary concern
3 – 15Action warranted
A score of 7 falls in the Action warranted range, indicating multiple monitoring or information-access behaviors that may conflict with consent or stated boundaries.
Physical Pursuit and Coercive EscalationPPaCE
Measures in-person pursuit and escalation behaviors such as showing up uninvited, following, or using coercion after boundaries are set.
example score9/15
9/15Immediate action warrantedexample score
0No items endorsed
1 – 2Boundary concern present
3 – 15Immediate action warranted
A score of 9 falls in the Immediate action warranted range, indicating multiple or more intense physical pursuit/coercive escalation behaviors were reported and boundaries may not be being respected.
Unwanted Contact and Boundary ResponseUCaBR
This scale summarizes reported unwanted contact behaviors and how you responded to another person’s boundaries or requests for distance.
example score4/15
4/15Action warrantedexample score
0No concerns reported
1 – 2Boundary concern
3 – 15Action warranted
A score of 4 falls in the “Action warranted” range, indicating you reported repeated or unwanted contact patterns where stopping direct and indirect contact is indicated regardless of intent.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Anxious ex-partners
41%OF USERS
People after a breakup who keep checking, messaging, or showing up and want to know if they’ve crossed a line despite feeling hurt or worried.
Boundary-blind admirers
34%OF USERS
People with a crush or fixation who repeatedly reach out, monitor someone’s life, or interpret mixed signals and want a reality check on consent and boundaries.
Friends and family observers
25%OF USERS
People concerned about someone else’s persistent behavior and looking for warning signs to guide a conversation or encourage safer choices.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Monitoring and Information AccessMaIA
You?
Average10.2
Typical rangeTypical8.1 – 12.3
Possible0 – 15
Physical Pursuit and Coercive EscalationPPaCE
You?
Average9.6
Typical rangeTypical7 – 12.2
Possible0 – 15
Unwanted Contact and Boundary ResponseUCaBR
You?
Average10.8
Typical rangeTypical8.4 – 13.2
Possible0 – 15
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • I stopped, except for communication they explicitly permitted or a necessary formal process.
    • I sent one final non-threatening acknowledgment and then stopped.
    • I continued trying to explain, apologize, argue, or obtain closure despite the request.
    • I refused the boundary and continued contacting them persistently.
    • I did not recruit other people to carry messages around a boundary.
    • I asked one person to pass along one neutral practical message, then stopped.
    • I repeatedly asked others to persuade the person, relay emotional messages, or report their response.
    • I pressured, deceived, or threatened others into helping me make contact.
    • I did not ask others to investigate or report on them.
    • I asked one mutual contact once whether they were doing okay.
    • I repeatedly asked friends, relatives, or coworkers where they were or who they were with.
    • I used deception, pressure, or someone’s privileged access to obtain private information.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Am I a Stalker Quiz - Description and methodology of the test

relationships

People who are questioning whether their contact has crossed another person's boundaries can use this stalking self-assessment to examine monitoring, pursuit, unwanted contact, and coercive responses. The Am I a Stalker Quiz is intended for personal reflection by someone reviewing their own conduct, especially after a request for distance, a blocked channel, or an escalating conflict. It identifies patterns that may require an immediate stop and deliberate change.

What This Assessment Explores

The items in this questionnaire examine conduct involving information gathering, unwanted contact, pursuit, intermediaries, boundary violations, and coercive responses. They ask about behavior after silence, blocking, refusal, or a request for distance, so the result concerns actions rather than a personality label.

As a stalking behavior assessment, it helps a respondent identify which patterns need to stop and where consent or physical distance requires clearer respect.

The result screen organizes the reported behaviors into three scales:

  • Monitoring and Information Access (0-15) summarizes personal-information monitoring; bands: No monitoring endorsed (0), Boundary concern (1-2), Action warranted (3-15).
  • Physical Pursuit and Coercive Escalation (0-15) summarizes following or coercive encounters; bands: No items endorsed (0), Boundary concern present (1-2), Immediate action warranted (3-15).
  • Unwanted Contact and Boundary Response (0-15) summarizes contact after limits; bands: No concerns reported (0), Boundary concern (1-2), Action warranted (3-15).

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each item presents four ordered response choices, moving from permitted conduct toward repeated, deceptive, threatening, or coercive behavior. The respondent selects the description closest to their actions rather than a simple yes-or-no label.

The questionnaire displays three summaries. It does not state how answer choices are converted into points. These unvalidated scores are reflective summaries or action prompts, not diagnostic, danger, or legal cutoffs. Any concerning response matters independently of the total, and a single red flag should be acted on.

Its closest conceptual reference is Stalking Assessment Indices (McEwan et al., 2021), a behavior-focused framework for organizing stalking-related conduct. This stalking questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work, not an adaptation of it. SORI-Q offers a relevant comparison for obsessive relational intrusions, while Fox, Nobles, and Fisher (2011) address challenges in defining and interpreting stalking measures.

Self-report results can be shaped by memory, current context, self-awareness, and willingness to disclose accurately; these factors can affect how reported conduct is interpreted. Use the questionnaire to identify concrete boundary-respecting changes, especially when conduct includes threats, pursuit, unauthorized access, or physical interference.

Literature:
  • McEwan, T. E., Simmons, M., Clothier, T., & Senkans, S. (2021). Measuring stalking: the development and evaluation of the Stalking Assessment Indices (SAI). Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(3), 435-461. 10.1080/13218719.2020.1787904
  • Gamache, D., Savard, C., Faucher, J., & Cloutier, M.-È. (2021). Development and Validation of the Stalking and Obsessive Relational Intrusions Questionnaire (SORI-Q). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(21-22), NP19420-NP19446. 10.1177/08862605211042808
  • Fox, K. A., Nobles, M. R., & Fisher, B. S. (2011). Method behind the madness: An examination of stalking measurements. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(1), 74-84. 10.1016/j.avb.2010.12.004
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment