Abandonment Issues Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
Abandonment Issues Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People who feel unsettled by distance, delayed replies, or shifts in affection may use this abandonment issues quiz to examine recurring relationship reactions. It is intended for people reflecting on dating or close relationships, especially when reassurance, jealousy, or fear of rejection feels difficult to regulate. The questionnaire serves as a fear of abandonment quiz by offering a structured profile of patterns rather than a yes-or-no label.
What This Assessment Explores
The questions cover separation, ambiguity, boundaries, attention shifts, jealousy, checking, people-pleasing, and discomfort with intimacy. Used as an abandonment issues test, the questionnaire groups these experiences into three result dimensions. The displayed bands are:
- Abandonment Anxiety (0-30) measures fear of being left, replaced, or forgotten and sensitivity to distance; higher scores indicate more worry and difficulty feeling secure. Bands: Low 0-10; Moderate 11-20; High 21-30.
- Reassurance-Seeking (0-30) measures reliance on confirmation; higher scores indicate more checking, urgency for replies, and difficulty self-soothing. Bands: Low reliance 0-10; Moderate reliance 11-20; High reliance 21-30.
- Trust & Closeness Strain (0-30) measures difficulty sustaining intimacy without jealousy, people-pleasing, or pull-push behavior; higher scores indicate suspicion, overaccommodation, and discomfort with closeness. Bands: Low strain 0-10; Moderate strain 11-20; High strain 21-30.
Together, the profile shows which relationship reactions stand out most.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement presents a relationship situation or internal reaction in first-person form. Four options-Strongly disagree, Disagree, Not sure, and Agree-show how closely it fits. The questionnaire displays three totals, but it does not specify item weights, reverse-scoring rules, or how answers become 0-30 scores, so those mechanics should not be inferred.
Conceptually, this abandonment anxiety test aligns with attachment and reassurance-seeking research, but it is not presented as an adaptation of a published scale. Shaver et al. (2005) connects insecure attachment with repeated reassurance seeking and emotional distress. Evraire et al. (2022) examines reassurance seeking and trust in romantic couples, while Collins and Read (1990) links adult attachment models with relationship quality.
Results indicate the relative strength of patterns represented in this self-report format and can guide reflection on communication, checking, jealousy, boundaries, and security needs. Standardization and clinical norming are not stated; mood, context, memory, self-awareness, and impression management may affect answers, so scores are best read as a focused starting point rather than a diagnosis.
- Shaver, P. R., Schachner, D. A., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment style, excessive reassurance seeking, relationship processes, and depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 343-359. 10.1177/0146167204271709
- Evraire, L. E., Dozois, D. J. A., & Wilde, J. L. (2022). The contribution of attachment styles and reassurance seeking to trust in romantic couples. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 18(1), 19-39. 10.5964/ejop.3059
- Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644-663. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644