Self Sabotage Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- I resume at the next reasonable opportunity without making it a major event.
- I adjust the plan and restart after a short pause.
- I wait for a symbolic fresh start, such as Monday or a new month.
- I largely abandon the routine because the missed session makes it feel spoiled.
- Rarely; I can usually return to the priority after a brief break.
- Occasionally; it causes a small delay but not a repeated pattern.
- Often; the priority regularly gets pushed later than intended.
- Very often; distraction repeatedly prevents meaningful progress.
- Complete a small scheduled portion even if I am not inspired.
- Put it off once or twice, then return to it.
- Wait for motivation and repeatedly move it to another day.
- Replace action with more planning, researching, or reorganizing.
Self Sabotage Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People who notice a recurring gap between intentions and actions can use this self sabotage quiz to examine what happens when a goal becomes uncomfortable, visible, or emotionally important. It is intended for personal reflection when delay, overcontrol, or withdrawal repeats across work, routines, opportunities, or relationships. Readers seeking an am i self destructive quiz can use its language to notice patterns and choose a deliberate next step.
What This Assessment Explores
Delay, rigid standards, and retreat around visibility or closeness are examined as situations to observe, not fixed traits.
The three scales are:
- Avoidance and Delay (0-15) reflects relief, distraction, or waiting for motivation interfering with action: Steady follow-through (0-5) means acting despite discomfort; Relief-driven delay (6-10) means priorities slip; Recurring avoidance (11-15) means progress is interrupted.
- Perfectionistic Control (0-15) reflects rigid standards or fear of mistakes: Flexible standards (0-5) allow imperfections; Standards create friction (6-10) slow completion; Perfectionistic interference (11-15) blocks action or satisfaction.
- Protective Retreat (0-15) reflects disengagement around visibility, expectations, support, or closeness: Staying engaged (0-5) means remaining involved; Guarded engagement (6-10) means hesitation limits opportunities; Protective retreat (11-15) means withdrawal interrupts progress or connection.
A result from this am i self sabotaging quiz shows which pattern may interfere with progress, completion, satisfaction, or connection.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item presents a familiar situation with four ordered response options. Choices range from flexible engagement to stronger delay, overcontrol, or retreat across routines, deadlines, mistakes, visibility, goals, and relationship repair. The format asks about likely behavior in context, not a broad identity label.
Scoring produces three separate profile results, so one pattern can stand out while others remain lower. The displayed bands are reflective descriptions rather than clinical or diagnostic cutoffs, and they do not establish cause, severity, or a mental-health condition.
Conceptually, the questionnaire is consistent with the Self-Handicapping Scale, developed by Jones and Rhodewalt, which examines obstacles used to protect self-evaluation. It also relates to self-handicapping theory discussed by Jones and Berglas, Frost’s perfectionism research, and Sirois and Pychyl’s account of short-term mood regulation in procrastination. It is not an adaptation of those measures or theories.
Honest answers matter, yet mood, exhaustion, stress, self-awareness, and practical barriers can shape self-report. This result lets readers use the what is my self destructive behavior quiz to consider which behaviors interfere with progress and interpret the answer through the three displayed dimensions.
- Jones, Edward E., and Frederick Rhodewalt. Self-Handicapping Scale. APA PsycTests database record, 1982. 10.1037/t09528-000
- Jones, Edward E., and Steven Berglas. Control of Attributions about the Self Through Self-handicapping Strategies: The Appeal of Alcohol and the Role of Underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(2), 200-206, 1978. 10.1177/014616727800400205
- Frost, Randy O., Patricia Marten, Cathleen Lahart, and Robin Rosenblate. The Dimensions of Perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 449-468, 1990. 10.1007/BF01172967
- Sirois, Fuschia M., and Timothy A. Pychyl. Procrastination and the Priority of Short-Term Mood Regulation: Consequences for Future Self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(2), 115-127, 2013. 10.1111/spc3.12011
Updated: