Am I the Problem Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- I identify a specific thing I did and also consider what the other person contributed.
- I reconstruct the sequence of events before deciding what each person contributed.
- I focus on the circumstances that explain why I reacted as I did.
- I mainly focus on what the other person did that set the conflict in motion.
- I wait for the other person to reopen the subject because I have already said my part.
- I reconnect after a little time and act normally unless the issue comes up again.
- I follow up when calmer, acknowledge the tension, and propose a specific next step.
- I remain distant until the other person shows that they understand my impact.
- I describe the imbalance with concrete examples and ask how they see it.
- I reduce my investment somewhat and observe whether the pattern changes.
- I continue helping but keep track of whether they eventually return the effort.
- I pull back without explaining to see whether they notice and pursue me.
Am I the Problem Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People who keep noticing friction in friendships, family ties, or romantic relationships may want a structured way to examine their own contribution. The Am I the Problem Quiz is intended for readers who prefer specific situations to a simple guilty-or-innocent label. It also works as a what is my problem quiz, addressing recurring conflicts less to assign blame than to identify repeatable habits.
What This Assessment Explores
Rather than reducing this am i the problem in my life quiz to a verdict, the questions examine how you review your contribution after conflict, respond when intent and impact differ, accept another person’s limits, manage unequal effort, and communicate while upset. This makes the profile useful for reflecting on patterns across close relationships without reducing a complicated interaction to one label.
The three displayed dimensions are:
- Accountability and Perspective (0-15) shows how you weigh your contribution and context; Open reflection (0-5), Mixed perspective (6-10), and Accountability gap (11-15) name the displayed bands.
- Boundaries and Reciprocity (0-15) shows how you express needs and accept autonomy; Respectful balance (0-5), Uneven give-and-take (6-10), and Boundary strain (11-15) describe the result.
- Communication Under Tension (0-15) shows how timing and tone shape difficult exchanges; Steady communication (0-5), Reactive moments (6-10), and Escalation pattern (11-15) indicate the level shown.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item presents an interpersonal situation with four response choices. The options contrast direct reflection, clear requests, and repair with defensiveness, indirect testing, overaccommodation, withdrawal, or escalation. Select what most resembles your usual behavior, not what sounds ideal.
Scores are reported separately across the three dimensions. Because the questionnaire does not specify how many points each option contributes, the three displayed bands are reflective descriptions rather than a formula to reverse-engineer.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory (Kurdek, 1994) and with communication-pattern research by Canary, Cupach, and Messman, Trifan, Meeus, and Branje, and Crenshaw and colleagues; the instrument and studies do not validate this specific online questionnaire.
As a relationship problem quiz, this exploratory self-report profile treats accountability as one dimension alongside boundaries, reciprocity, and communication under tension. Current stress, memory, self-awareness, and impression management can shape answers, so the result is best considered alongside the concrete interaction that prompted you to take it. It can identify themes to revisit, but it cannot establish who was solely responsible for a conflict.
- Trifan, Tatiana Alina, Wim Meeus, and Susan Branje (2024). The dimensionality of the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory across age and relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1233279. 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1233279
- Kurdek, Lawrence A. (1994). Conflict Resolution Styles in Gay, Lesbian, Heterosexual Nonparent, and Heterosexual Parent Couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56(3), 705-722. 10.2307/352880
- Canary, Daniel J., William R. Cupach, and Susan J. Messman (1995). Relationship Conflict: Conflict in Parent-Child, Friendship, and Romantic Relationships. SAGE Publications. 10.4135/9781452243795
- Crenshaw, Alexander O., Andrew Christensen, Donald H. Baucom, Norman B. Epstein, and Brian R. W. Baucom (2017). Revised Scoring and Improved Reliability for the Communication Patterns Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 29(7), 913-925. 10.1037/pas0000385
Updated: