Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
style of love

Love Styles Test

Love Styles Test - Free Love Quiz Online - FreudlyUnderstand your dominant love style and relationship patterns in about 8 minutes. Take this Love Styles Test — the validated 42-item LAS — to see where you and a partner align or clash across six distinct approaches to love.en
Understand your dominant love style and relationship patterns in about 8 minutes. In 42 items, it clarifies where partners align or clash, supporting sharper counseling and research insights.
Start Online Test
Questions: 428 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
17,630 views
1,575 completions
1,199 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
14/35
Mania (M)
Measures the tendency toward emotionally intense, insecure, and jealousy-prone patterns of romantic attachment.
Low mania
Moderate mania
High mania
713: Low mania | 1421: Moderate mania | 2235: High mania
A score of 14 falls in the Moderate mania range, suggesting occasional intensity and worry in attachment that may show up as sensitivity to reassurance or signs of jealousy under stress.
example score
17/35
Sensuality (Eros) (S)
Sensuality (Eros) measures the intensity of passionate, physical attraction and emotionally vivid early-stage bonding in romantic relationships.
Low
Moderate
High
715: Low | 1621: Moderate | 2235: High
A score of 17 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not dominant tendency toward passionate, sensual attraction and intense early bonding.
example score
16/35
Playfulness (Ludus) (P)
Measures the extent to which a person approaches love as playful, low-commitment, and game-like rather than emotionally involved.
Low
Moderate
High
717: Low | 1825: Moderate | 2635: High
A score of 16 falls in the Low range, suggesting you generally prefer sincerity and commitment over game-like or multiple-partner dynamics in relationships.
example score
21/35
Pragmatism (Pragma) (P)
Pragmatism (Pragmma) measures how strongly a person approaches partner choice rationally, prioritizing practical criteria and compatibility over emotional intensity.
Low pragmatism
Moderate pragmatism
High pragmatism
714: Low pragmatism | 1524: Moderate pragmatism | 2535: High pragmatism
A score of 21 falls in the Moderate pragmatism range, suggesting a balanced tendency to consider practical compatibility while still allowing room for emotional factors.
example score
22/35
Respect (Storge) (R)
Measures a storge-based love style centered on respect, trust, and friendship that supports stable long-term bonding.
Low
Moderate
High
718: Low | 1926: Moderate | 2735: High
A score of 22 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable tendency to value companionship and reliability in relationships without this being the dominant approach.
example score
18/35
Selfless Love (Agape) (SL)
Measures the degree to which a person shows self-sacrificing, altruistic (Agape) love toward a partner without expecting reciprocity.
Low
Moderate
High
715: Low | 1621: Moderate | 2235: High
A score of 18 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable tendency toward caring and selfless giving in relationships while still maintaining some balance of personal needs.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Couples in active work
41%OF USERS
Partners take it to compare love styles, spot mismatches, and choose practical next steps for strengthening the relationship.
Individuals seeking clarity
34%OF USERS
People take it to understand their typical patterns in love, jealousy, commitment, and expectations before or during dating.
Therapists and researchers
25%OF USERS
Professionals use it to quickly assess dominant love styles in clients or study how attitudes toward love relate to relationship outcomes.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Mania (M)
Mania (M)
Average
23.9
Normal range
20.127.7
min.
7
max.
35
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Sensuality (Eros) (S()
Sensuality (Eros) (S()
Average
24.7
Normal range
20.229.2
min.
7
max.
35
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Playfulness (Ludus) (P()
Playfulness (Ludus) (P()
Average
21.4
Normal range
1824.8
min.
7
max.
35
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Pragmatism (Pragmma) (P()
Pragmatism (Pragmma) (P()
Average
24.7
Normal range
20.428.9
min.
7
max.
35
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Respect (Storge) (R()
Respect (Storge) (R()
Average
25
Normal range
2030
min.
7
max.
35
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Recklessness (Agape) (R()
Recklessness (Agape) (R()
Average
21.3
Normal range
16.326.3
min.
7
max.
35
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

The statements below reflect different ways people approach romantic relationships. Indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each statement. Each statement corresponds to a particular type of relationship between romantic partners. If possible, respond with your current partner in mind. If you are not currently dating anyone, think about your most recent partner. If you have never been in love, indicate the response you believe would be most likely for you, as you imagine it.
    • Strongly agree
    • Agree somewhat
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Disagree somewhat
    • Strongly disagree
    • Strongly agree
    • Agree more than disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Disagree more than agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Strongly agree
    • Agree more than disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Disagree more than agree
    • Strongly disagree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Approaches to Love Scale, AALS Test
style of love

This self-report measure assesses individual differences in romantic attitudes and preferences. Developed by Clyde Hendrick and Susan S. Hendrick, the Love Styles Test uses the Love Attitudes Scale (LAS) to characterize how people conceptualize love and approach intimate relationships across six distinct styles. It consists of 42 items and typically takes about 8 minutes to complete, producing a profile that shows which love styles are most and least characteristic of you.

Why Take a Love Styles Test

People don't just love differently in degree — they love differently in kind. One person may approach relationships through intense passion and physical chemistry, another through steady friendship and trust, and a third through practical compatibility and shared goals. None of these approaches is inherently better, but mismatches between partners in dominant love style are a frequent, underrecognized source of relationship friction that neither person can quite name.

A structured love quiz based on Lee's classic typology, as operationalized in the LAS, gives language to these differences. Rather than vaguely sensing that you and a partner "want different things," this test for love styles identifies specifically which approaches to love are strongest for each of you — making it possible to have a concrete, non-blaming conversation about where you align and where you may need to actively bridge a gap.

This love style quiz is also widely used before or during dating to help individuals understand their own patterns around jealousy, commitment, and relational expectations — clarifying what they genuinely need from a partner rather than relying on assumption or trial and error.

What the Assessment Measures

The LAS yields scores across six distinct love styles, each reflecting a different approach to romantic relationships:

  • Eros (Sensuality) — passionate, physical attraction and emotionally vivid early-stage bonding
  • Ludus (Playfulness) — a playful, low-commitment, game-like approach to love with less emotional depth
  • Storge (Respect) — friendship-based love built on trust, tenderness, and shared interests, supporting stable long-term bonding
  • Pragma (Pragmatism) — a rational approach to partner choice, prioritizing practical compatibility over emotional intensity
  • Mania — emotionally intense, insecure, and jealousy-prone attachment marked by anxiety and need for reassurance
  • Agape (Selfless Love) — self-sacrificing, altruistic love given without expecting reciprocity

Each style is scored independently as low, moderate, or high. Most people show a dominant style alongside secondary tendencies — higher scores reflect stronger endorsement of that pattern, not better or worse relationship quality.

Who This Assessment Is For

This Love Styles Test is appropriate for adolescents and adults in counseling, education, or research settings, as well as anyone curious about their own patterns in love, jealousy, commitment, and relational expectations. Couples often take it together to compare styles, spot mismatches, and identify practical next steps for strengthening the relationship. Therapists and researchers use it to quickly assess dominant love styles in clients or study how attitudes toward love relate to relationship outcomes.

Clinical Validity and Use in Practice

The LAS is grounded in Hendrick and Hendrick's influential theory and method of love, published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, and remains widely used in relationship research. Results are descriptive patterns rather than diagnostic indicators. In practice, this love test quiz can inform case conceptualization by clarifying relational expectations, attachment-related behaviors, and potential areas of mismatch within couples. Findings should be integrated with clinical interview data and other assessment sources when used to guide treatment planning.

Author: Clyde Hendrick, Susan S. Hendrick
Literature: S. Folkman, J. T. Moskowitz. Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology. 2004.; R. J. Sternberg. A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review. 1986.; C. Hendrick, S. S. Hendrick. A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment