Is My Mother-in-Law a Narcissist Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- She may state her view, but she leaves the decision to the people responsible for it.
- She continues giving unwanted advice after being asked to stop.
- She tries to take over the decision or recruits others to overrule me.
- She deliberately sabotages the decision or interferes in a way that could cause serious harm.
- She addresses the issue directly without asking others to take sides.
- She complains to someone else before trying to resolve it with me.
- She regularly recruits relatives to pressure me or repeat her version of events.
- She threatens, coerces, or demands that loved ones cut me off or choose between us.
- She makes arrangements and accepts the limits set by the people involved.
- She repeatedly pushes for access at times that do not work for us.
- She arrives unannounced, bypasses me, or treats agreed limits as optional.
- She enters, takes access, or refuses to leave despite being clearly denied permission.
Is My Mother-in-Law a Narcissist Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People who feel confused, pressured, or repeatedly sidelined in interactions with a partner’s mother can use the Is My Mother in Law a Narcissist Quiz to organize what they have noticed. It focuses on recurring behavior from a mother-in-law and helps readers notice patterns in mother-in-law behavior that deserve closer attention.
What This Assessment Explores
Rather than deciding whether someone "is a narcissist," this quiz addresses possible narcissistic behavior from a mother-in-law by examining recurring conduct that can make family relationships difficult or unsafe. It is intended for readers reflecting on their own interactions and seeking a structured view of patterns involving limits, pressure, empathy, and accountability.
The three result dimensions are:
- Boundary Respect (0-15) shows whether answers endorsed concerns about limits around decisions, access, privacy, or children; bands are No indicators endorsed (0), Worth noticing (1-2), and Take action (3-15).
- Control and Relationship Pressure (0-15) reflects concerns about coercion, divided loyalties, or leverage through help; bands are No indicators endorsed (0), Worth noticing (1-2), and Take action (3-15).
- Empathy and Accountability (0-15) captures concerns about dismissed vulnerability, blame shifting, or absent repair; bands are No indicator endorsed (0), Worth noticing (1-2), and Take action (3-15).
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item offers four response choices, moving from respectful conduct toward intrusive, coercive, humiliating, or retaliatory behavior. Answers are summarized across dimensions, but the questionnaire does not specify each option’s point contribution, so the result is reflective rather than standardized. The bands are unvalidated reflective summaries, not diagnostic, severity, clinical, or legal cutoffs. A concerning answer matters independently of the total; a single red-flag response should be taken seriously regardless of the scale total. Seek urgent local safety or emergency support if you feel threatened or unsafe, especially where threats, coercion, stalking, or isolation are present.
When it addresses boundary issues involving a mother-in-law, the questionnaire stays tied to observable situations. It is conceptually consistent with Rittenour and Koenig Kellas (2015) on hurtful in-law communication, Ayers et al. (2022) on mother-in-law/daughter-in-law conflict, and Young and DeGroot (2021) on boundary management, but is not an adaptation or reproduction of those instruments.
Narcissistic personality disorder is a defined clinical construct, whereas these items describe relationship behaviors; memory, current stress, and perspective can shape self-report.
- Rittenour, Christine E., and Jody Koenig Kellas. 2015. Making Sense of Hurtful Mother-in-law Messages: Applying Attribution Theory to the In-Law Triad. Communication Quarterly, 63(1), 62-80. 10.1080/01463373.2014.965837
- Ayers, Jessica D., Jaimie Arona Krems, Nicole Hess, and Athena Aktipis. 2022. Mother-in-Law Daughter-in-Law Conflict: an Evolutionary Perspective and Report of Empirical Data from the USA. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 8(1), 56-71. 10.1007/s40806-021-00312-x
- Young, Valerie J., and Jocelyn M. DeGroot. 2021. Topic Avoidance as a Boundary Management Strategy in Communication With a Mother-in-Law. Family Relations, 70(2), 408-421. 10.1111/fare.12409
- American Psychiatric Association. 2022. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR). American Psychiatric Association Publishing. 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
Updated: