Are You Okay Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not at all
- On several days
- On more than half the days
- Nearly every day, for much of the day
- I have not noticed a meaningful change
- The change has appeared occasionally without lasting long
- It has repeatedly affected conversations or activities
- It has been intense, persistent, or very difficult to regulate
- I can still become interested and enjoy it
- I enjoy it once I start, but getting interested takes more effort
- I take part, but feel little enjoyment while doing it
- Even activities I value feel empty or impossible to engage with
Are You Okay Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People who feel unlike themselves, struggle with ordinary routines, or are unsure how seriously to take a difficult period may use the Are You Okay Quiz to organize what has been happening. The questionnaire measures emotional wellbeing through recent experiences, using an emotional wellbeing quiz format to distinguish change from fixed identity. The result separates emotional change, disrupted functioning, and safety concerns so the next step can be more deliberate.
What This Assessment Explores
It asks about recent mood, sleep, energy, interest, concentration, self-worth, outlook, routines, essential needs, support access, and self-harm-related thoughts or actions. Someone deciding whether this check-in fits their current concerns can use this assessment as an are you ok quiz to identify issues. The three result dimensions are:
- Emotional Changes: 0-15 measures changes in mood, interest, shame, irritability, numbness, or hopelessness; bands: No endorsed change (0), Worth noticing (1-2), Reach out (3-15).
- Everyday Functioning: 0-15 measures disruption in sleep, concentration, energy, tasks, social contact, or routines; bands: No endorsed disruption (0), Emerging friction (1-2), Support recommended (3-15).
- Immediate Safety and Support: 0-15 measures alerts about essential needs, self-harm, safety, danger, and reachable help; bands: No endorsed alert (0), Support signal (1-2), Act now (3-15).
Any concerning endorsed experience matters independently of the total; a red-flag response overrides the aggregate score.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item offers four ordered choices, moving from little or no difficulty toward greater disruption, danger, or need for support. The platform groups these responses into domain totals without stating a point value for each choice. Because it is self-report, interpretation depends on the respondent’s understanding and candor. The bands are unvalidated summaries, not clinical severity cutoffs, and scores do not establish a diagnosis.
Conceptually, the emotional and functioning content is consistent with the PHQ-9, covering mood, sleep, energy, interest, concentration, and self-worth. Safety content is consistent with the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, especially its focus on suicidal thoughts, preparatory behavior, intent, and immediate safety. This questionnaire is not an adaptation or replacement for either instrument.
The assessment provides a mental health check-in by organizing recent patterns and helping someone decide whether to contact a trusted person, clinician, or crisis service. Interpretation should consider duration, context, medical or situational influences, and changes in functioning or safety. Any concerning safety response matters independently of the total; uncertainty about staying safe warrants immediate local emergency or crisis support.
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2001;16(9):606-613. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
- Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, Currier GW, Melvin GA, Greenhill L, Shen S, Mann JJ. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2011;168(12):1266-1277. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704
Updated: