Am I Omni Quiz
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- It is fairly easy because one gender describes the present moment.
- I can answer, but the answer may be different at another time.
- It is difficult because several genders feel present together.
- It is difficult because separating one gender from an all-encompassing whole feels artificial.
- One gender is present at a time.
- One gender is central, with faint traces of others.
- Several genders can be present as recognizable layers.
- The full range feels present as an integrated whole.
- It centers on one particular gender.
- It contains a small cluster of closely related genders.
- It reaches across several substantially different genders.
- It extends throughout nearly the entire gender spectrum.
Am I Omni Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
For people exploring whether an encompassing gender experience fits their self-understanding, the Am I Omni Quiz offers a guided way to examine that question without forcing an immediate label. It is intended for readers who notice connections across many genders, experience several gender elements together, or are testing whether the word omnigender feels personally useful. As an omnigender quiz, it focuses on gender identity rather than sexual orientation.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire separates three related dimensions of gender experience. Together, they show whether breadth, label fit, or co-presence is most prominent:
- Breadth of Gender Connection (0-15) shows how widely your gender sense extends across binary, nonbinary, and other experiences: Focused connection 0-5, Broad connection 6-10, Spectrum-wide connection 11-15.
- Omnigender Label Resonance (0-15) shows how meaningful, comfortable, and useful the label feels: Limited resonance 0-5, Possible resonance 6-10, Strong resonance 11-15.
- Simultaneous Gender Integration (0-15) shows whether multiple genders feel co-present or integrated: Distinct/Singular 0-5, Layered 6-10, Highly Integrated 11-15.
Taken together, this omnigender identity test distinguishes connection with many genders from comfort using one encompassing label, while also noticing whether experiences feel simultaneous or sequential. It suits people who are questioning, refining, or comparing language for their gender, and it leaves room for uncertainty, change, and no label.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Most items in this gender identity questionnaire use four ordered response choices rather than yes/no. The choices move from singular or separated experiences toward broader, layered, or integrated possibilities. Responses are combined into three displayed scores; the bands describe the pattern represented by those scores, not a rule that assigns an identity.
Ginicola et al. (2017) supplies an affirming context for discussing LGBTQI+ identities without treating labels as problems to solve. The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Mollenkott's (2001) discussion of omnigender as an encompassing identity term. Thorne et al. (2019) situates terminology that can exist between, outside, or beyond binary categories, while National Academies guidance (2022) supports distinguishing gender identity from related constructs.
The three scales are descriptive measures for this online questionnaire; they are not presented as published instruments with established population norms. A score can show what feels recognizable now, but it cannot confirm, deny, or require an identity. Current context, vocabulary, and comfort with self-description may shape self-report, so the profile is best read as a structured reflection rather than a fixed verdict.
- Ginicola, Misty M., Cheri Smith, and Joel M. Filmore, eds. (2017). Affirmative Counseling With LGBTQI+ People. American Counseling Association. 10.1002/9781119375517
- Mollenkott, Virginia Ramey. (2001). Omnigender: A Trans-religious Approach. Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim Press. ISBN: 9780829814224
- Thorne, Nat, Andrew Kam-Tuck Yip, Walter Pierre Bouman, Ellen Marshall, and Jon Arcelus. (2019). The terminology of identities between, outside and beyond the gender binary - A systematic review. International Journal of Transgenderism, 20(2-3), 138-154. 10.1080/15532739.2019.1640654
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022). Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 10.17226/26424