Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly

Am I Homicidal Quiz

Am I Homicidal Quiz - Free Psychopathy Spectrum Test - FreudlyTake a free am i homicidal quiz to explore whether you are homicidal and understand what it means. Quick, no sign-up needed. Start now!en
With 15 questions, the Am I Homicidal Quiz takes about 10 minutes to complete and provides a structured safety self-check about violent thoughts, urges, control, intent, preparation, and support. Your result can clarify whether you reported no current indicator, would benefit from support, or need urgent protection.
Questions: 1510 minutes
Am I Homicidal Quiz: situation and reply bubbles
July 22, 2026July 22, 2026Material has been updatedJuly 22, 2026Material has been published
7,817 views
716 completions
667 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
667 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Immediate Control and Support NeedsICaSN
Measures current need for immediate self-control supports and external help to maintain safety based on endorsed indicators of risk, proximity, and ability to secure support.
example score11/15
11/15Urgent protection neededexample score
0No indicator in these items
1 – 2Support would be useful
3 – 15Urgent protection needed
A score of 11 falls in the “Urgent protection needed” range, indicating multiple endorsed signals of reduced control or limited support that suggest a high immediate need for protective steps and assistance.
Intent and PreparationIaP
This scale reflects reported signs of violent intent, planning, threats, access to means, or other preparation-related behaviors.
example score5/15
5/15Immediate action thresholdexample score
0No indicator in these items
1 – 2Concerning movement
3 – 15Immediate action threshold
A score of 5 falls in the Immediate action threshold range, indicating reported intent or preparation-related indicators in these items.
Violent Thoughts and UrgesVTaU
Measures the presence and intensity of recent violent thoughts, urges, or impulses as self-reported in these items.
example score2/15
2/15Worth discussingexample score
0No current indicator
1 – 2Worth discussing
3 – 15Prompt support warranted
A score of 2 falls in the “Worth discussing” range, suggesting at least one unwanted or concerning experience was endorsed and may be helpful to monitor and reflect on.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Scared by violent thoughts
41%OF USERS
People who’ve had intrusive or anger-driven thoughts about hurting someone and want a reality check on risk and safety steps.
After a blow-up
34%OF USERS
People coming in after a fight, breakup, bullying, or rejection who feel out of control and want to assess intent and cooling-down options.
Supporting someone else
25%OF USERS
Friends, partners, parents, or teachers worried about someone’s threats or obsession and looking for guidance on warning signs and next actions.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Immediate Control and Support NeedsICaSN
You?
Average9.4
Typical rangeTypical6.7 – 12.1
Possible0 – 15
Intent and PreparationIaP
You?
Average10
Typical rangeTypical7.9 – 12.1
Possible0 – 15
Violent Thoughts and UrgesVTaU
You?
Average5.1
Typical rangeTypical2.7 – 7.5
Possible0 – 15
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • I do not want or intend to harm anyone.
    • I do not intend to act, although the presence of the thoughts worries me.
    • I do not have a firm decision, and I am uncertain what I might do under a trigger or confrontation.
    • I intend, expect, or may choose to seriously harm someone.
    • I have not had thoughts like that.
    • A brief, unwanted image or thought occurred and quickly passed.
    • Unwanted thoughts have returned or have been difficult to dismiss, although I do not want to act on them.
    • The thoughts have included a desire or urge to kill or seriously injure someone.
    • I have no current violent urge and feel able to continue using nonviolent choices.
    • I have distressing thoughts, but I feel in control and am using coping or support.
    • I am not fully certain I can maintain control without another person helping me.
    • I cannot ensure safety, or I believe someone may be in immediate danger from me.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Am I Homicidal Quiz - Description and methodology of the test

People who feel frightened by violent thoughts, uncertain about their control, or worried about another person’s immediate safety may use the Am I Homicidal Quiz to organize what is happening now. It is a violent thoughts self-assessment, not a verdict about character. The result highlights urges, intent, preparation, proximity, and access to support so the next safe step is clearer.

What This Assessment Explores

The questionnaire examines current violent thoughts, urges, control, intent, preparation, proximity, and access to support. It also notes protective responses, including leaving conflict and accepting help.

The result is organized into three scales:

  • Immediate Control and Support Needs (0-15) shows No indicator in these items (0), Support would be useful (1-2), or Urgent protection needed (3-15).
  • Intent and Preparation (0-15) shows No indicator in these items (0), Concerning movement (1-2), or Immediate action threshold (3-15).
  • Violent Thoughts and Urges (0-15) shows No current indicator (0), Worth discussing (1-2), or Prompt support warranted (3-15).

As a homicidal ideation quiz, it helps distinguish distressing thoughts from reduced control, movement toward a target, or preparation. A single red-flag response overrides the total and should guide immediate safety action.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

This structured self-report presents each item as a safety-relevant situation with four ordered response choices, moving from nonviolent control toward stronger urges, reduced control, threats, approach behavior, preparation, or recent serious harm. Responses are grouped into the three displayed scales, each reported on a 0-15 range; the scoring description does not establish a fixed point value for every answer.

Conceptually, the questionnaire is consistent with I-HAVAT (Malik et al., 2019), which addresses violent and homicidal ideation, and with Reynolds and McCrea’s 2017 study of spontaneous violent and homicide thoughts. Thienhaus and Piasecki (1998) support attention to intent, access to means, proximity, agitation, substance use, and recent behavior in violence assessment. It is not presented as an adaptation or standardized administration of those published works.

As a homicidal thoughts test, it uses reflective bands, not validated clinical, legal, or violence-prediction cutoffs. Scores can shift with honesty, distress, intoxication, sleep loss, interpretation of choices, and willingness to disclose. A red-flag response overrides a low total: create distance from the person and weapons, involve a trusted person, and contact emergency or crisis services.

Literature:
  • Salma Malik, Kevin Young, Sophia Walker, and Mirela Loftus. "A Novel Approach to Assess Violent and Homicidal Ideation: The I-HAVAT©." Adolescent Psychiatry, 9(2), 2019, 100-117. 10.2174/2210676608666181016161516
  • Joshua J. Reynolds and Sean M. McCrea. "Spontaneous Violent and Homicide Thoughts in Four Homicide Contexts." Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(4), 2017, 605-627. 10.1080/13218719.2016.1259540
  • Ole J. Thienhaus and Melissa Piasecki. "Assessment of Psychiatric Patients' Risk of Violence Toward Others." Psychiatric Services, 49(9), 1998, 1129-1147. 10.1176/ps.49.9.1129

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment