Body Shape Quiz with Measurements
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- It forms the clearest inward point of the torso
- It is softly rounded but remains narrower than both bust and hips
- It is nearly as prominent as the bust or hips
- It is the most prominent part of the torso outline
- It is noticeably loose at both the chest and hips
- It is slightly loose at either the chest or hips
- It fits fairly evenly throughout
- It is more likely to be loose at the waist than elsewhere
- Roughly 12–19% smaller than each
- Less than 5% smaller, or not smaller than both
- At least about 20% smaller than each
- Roughly 5–11% smaller than each
Body Shape Quiz with Measurements - Description and methodology of the test
Designed for anyone who wants a clearer, neutral description of their proportions, the body shape quiz with measurements translates observations about the torso into an easy-to-read profile. It can support clothing decisions and help readers compare how different garments sit across the torso without treating a silhouette label as a judgment. The result offers a practical body proportions assessment without treating a silhouette label as a judgment.
What This Assessment Measures
For styling, this body shape assessment focuses on proportions, not weight, fitness, or health. Measurements are read with torso outline, waist definition, shoulder-to-hip balance, and clothing fit. The five profiles and bands are:
- Hourglass (0-12) shows similar bust and hip proportions with a smaller waist; Limited match 0-4, Partial match 5-8, Strong match 9-12.
- Inverted Triangle (0-12) shows a broader shoulder or bust line; Limited match 0-4, Partial match 5-8, Strong match 9-12.
- Oval / Apple (0-12) shows a waist or midsection close to or larger than bust and hips; Limited match 0-4, Partial match 5-8, Strong match 9-12.
- Rectangle (0-12) shows similar bust, waist, and hip measurements with subtle waist definition; Limited match 0-4, Partial match 5-8, Strong match 9-12.
- Triangle / Pear (0-12) shows hips broader than the bust or shoulders; Limited match 0-4, Partial match 5-8, Strong match 9-12.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item presents a measurement comparison, torso feature, or clothing-fit situation with four response options. Prompts address waist definition, bust-hip and shoulder-hip balance, outline, garment ease, and percentage relationships, producing five profile scores in this self-report body shape questionnaire.
Scoring is descriptive: the highest score indicates strongest affinity, while any profile within one point is blended with it. The questionnaire does not state how many points each answer contributes, so no further scoring rule can be inferred.
Its measurement themes are conceptually consistent with FFIT for Apparel, which connects body measurements with apparel-oriented shape classification. FFIT and Body Shape Assessment Scale research, plus shape-sorting and validation studies by Simmons, Istook, Devarajan, and colleagues, offer context; none validates this five-profile questionnaire, which is not a direct adaptation. Connell and colleagues’ scale also supplies context.
Self-measurement, clothing familiarity, posture, current fit, and personal interpretation may affect answers. Without stated population norms or clinical standardization, the result remains a descriptive proportion guide rather than a health conclusion.
- Simmons, Karla P., Cynthia L. Istook, and Priya Devarajan. “Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for Apparel, Part I: Describing Female Shapes.” Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management 4, no. 1 (2004): 1-16.
- Simmons, Karla P., Cynthia L. Istook, and Priya Devarajan. “Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for Apparel, Part II: Development of Shape Sorting Software.” Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management 4, no. 1 (2004): 1-15.
- Devarajan, Priya, and Cynthia L. Istook. “Validation of ‘Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for Apparel’ Software.” Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management 4, no. 1 (2004): 1-23.
- Connell, Lenda Jo, Pamela V. Ulrich, Evelyn L. Brannon, Marina Alexander, and Ann Beth Presley. “Body Shape Assessment Scale: Instrument Development for Analyzing Female Figures.” Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 24, no. 2 (2006): 80-95. 10.1177/0887302X0602400203
Updated: