Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
metacognition

Metacognitive Behavior Self-Assessment Scale Test

Metacognitive Behavior Self-Assessment Scale Test - FreudlyMetacognition test: rate 12 thinking strategies and get your metacognitive level from 0 to 100, split into planning, reflection and working with ideas.en
Find out how much of your thinking you really steer. This metacognition test rates 12 thinking strategies and turns your answers into a metacognitive level from 0 to 100, then splits it into planning, reflection and working with ideas. It takes about 3 minutes.
Questions: 123 minutes
Student planning a task, Metacognitive Behavior Self-Assessment Scale
October 12, 2026October 12, 2026Material has been updatedOctober 12, 2026Material has been published
32,056 views
7,590 completions
2,929 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,929 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Level of Metacognitive Strategy DevelopmentLoMSD
How much of your thinking you plan, watch and correct, on a 0 to 100 scale.
example score65/100
65/100Partly in controlexample score
0 – 33Thinking on autopilot
34 – 67Partly in control
68 – 100In control of your thinking
Your metacognitive level is 65 out of 100: Partly in control.
Planning and controlPac
How often you think ahead and stay in charge of a hard task.
example score10/16
10/16Moderateexample score
0 – 5Low
6 – 11Moderate
12 – 16High
You scored 10 out of 16: Moderate.
Reflection and reviewRar
How often you look back at your own thinking and check it.
example score10/16
10/16Moderateexample score
0 – 5Low
6 – 11Moderate
12 – 16High
You scored 10 out of 16: Moderate.
Working with ideasWwi
How deeply you process what you learn.
example score10/16
10/16Moderateexample score
0 – 5Low
6 – 11Moderate
12 – 16High
You scored 10 out of 16: Moderate.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Students and exam prep
46%OF USERS
You put in the hours and want to know why the results do not match the effort.
Hard problems at work
32%OF USERS
You solve complex tasks and want to see where your thinking runs on autopilot.
Learning on your own
22%OF USERS
You pick up new skills alone and want a method that sticks.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Level of Metacognitive Strategy DevelopmentLoMSD
You?
Average68.8
Typical rangeTypical58.3 – 79.3
Possible0 – 100
Planning and controlPac
You?
Average11
Typical rangeTypical9 – 13
Possible0 – 16
Reflection and reviewRar
You?
Average11
Typical rangeTypical9 – 13
Possible0 – 16
Working with ideasWwi
You?
Average11
Typical rangeTypical9 – 13
Possible0 – 16
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Each line names a thinking strategy and explains it in brackets. Choose how often you use it when you study, work on a hard task or make an important decision, from Very often to Very rarely. Think of an ordinary week rather than your best day, and go with your first honest answer. There are 12 strategies, and the whole scale takes about 3 minutes.
    • Very often
    • Often
    • Sometimes
    • Rarely
    • Very rarely
    • Very often
    • Often
    • Sometimes
    • Rarely
    • Very rarely
    • Very often
    • Often
    • Sometimes
    • Rarely
    • Very rarely
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Metacognitive Behavior Self-Assessment Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test

metacognition

Some people study for hours and remember little, while others seem to get further with less effort. The difference is rarely raw intelligence and far more often how closely they watch their own thinking. This metacognition test turns that habit into one number and shows what stands behind it. Teachers call it the core of self-regulated learning, and it can be trained like any other skill.

What the scale measures

The Metacognitive Behavior Self-Assessment Scale lists twelve thinking strategies and asks how often you use each one. Your result opens with an overall metacognitive level from 0 to 100, then splits it into three parts of four strategies each. Planning and control covers mapping out a task, weighing the consequences of each option, building a mental model of the problem and staying with it when it gets hard. Reflection and review covers judging your work by several criteria, comparing your own view with real feedback, naming the strategy you used and keeping a journal. Working with ideas covers asking questions that reveal gaps, retelling material in your own words, defining vague terms and taking another person's view. Unlike a long metacognitive awareness questionnaire, it takes a few minutes and still shows every part on its own.

How it works and how to read your score

Each line names a strategy and explains it in brackets. You choose how often you use it, from Very often to Very rarely, thinking of an ordinary week of study or work. Very often gives four points and Very rarely gives none, so the twelve answers add up to a raw score from 0 to 48 that is shown as 0 to 100. The whole scale takes about three minutes. Your result includes:

  • your metacognitive level from 0 to 100 with a plain label;
  • separate scores for planning, reflection and working with ideas;
  • the strategy that carries you and the one that slips first;
  • a comparison with other people who rated the same strategies.

The bottom third means your thinking often runs on autopilot, the middle third means you take control at key moments, and the top third means you plan, watch and correct yourself on most tasks. Use the result as a metacognitive skills assessment you can repeat: practise one weak strategy for a few weeks, then take the scale again and compare.

Author: Adrian Wells
Literature:
  • Karpov, A. V., & Skityaeva, I. M. (2005). Psychology of Metacognitive Processes of Personality. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
  • Karpov, A. A., Karpov, A. V., Karabushchenko, N. B., & Ivashchenko, A. V. (2017). The interconnection of learning ability and the organization of metacognitive processes and traits of personality. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 10(1), 67-79.
  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
  • Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475.

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment