Erectile Dysfunction Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- I have noticed no meaningful change
- There was a mild or brief change that mostly resolved
- There is a clear change that keeps returning
- The change was sudden, substantial, or has remained persistent
- Never
- On a small number of occasions
- During about half of relevant occasions
- During most or nearly all relevant occasions
- I have not experienced the difficulty
- It happened once or during a brief isolated period
- It has returned on several separate occasions
- It has continued through most attempts over weeks or months
Erectile Dysfunction Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People noticing a change in erection quality, firmness, timing, or confidence can use this erectile dysfunction quiz to organize what has happened and decide what deserves attention. It is intended for people reflecting on their own experience, including those unsure whether occasional difficulty is becoming a recurring pattern. This do-I-have-erectile-dysfunction quiz helps turn scattered observations into a clearer conversation with a clinician.
What This Assessment Measures
Rather than labeling occasional difficulty as a fixed condition, the questionnaire reviews changes from usual erection pattern, frequency, duration, situational spread, and effects on confidence or intimacy. It also covers firmness, morning erections, medicines or substances, pain, injury, cardiovascular or breathing symptoms, and neurological warning signs. As a sexual dysfunction quiz, it keeps physical, emotional, and relational context together.
The three result dimensions are:
- Erection Changes (0-15) summarizes reported changes in erection quality, firmness, persistence, or timing; bands are Baseline responses (0), Limited change (1-2), and Follow-up indicated (3-15).
- Health and Urgent Safety Signals (0-15) organizes associated health, medication, cardiovascular, neurological, and safety concerns; bands are Baseline responses (0), Discussable signal (1-2), and Prompt action indicated (3-15).
- Pattern and Personal Impact (0-15) reflects how broadly the difficulty occurs and how it affects thoughts, choices, or intimacy; bands are Baseline responses (0), Emerging impact (1-2), and Follow-up indicated (3-15).
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item offers four ordered choices, moving from minimal experience toward frequent, persistent, disruptive, or urgent experiences. Topics include duration, situational spread, firmness, emotional response, partner impact, medication links, and warning signs.
Three separate totals are shown, but no point value is stated for each response. The bands are explicitly unvalidated: they organize follow-up rather than establish severity, cause, medical clearance, or clinical cutoffs. A concerning response matters independently, and a red flag should override the total.
Conceptually, it is consistent with International Index of Erectile Function, a multidimensional sexual-function measure, but it is not the IIEF or a validated adaptation. The AUA Guideline and Princeton IV Consensus emphasize health and cardiovascular context; AUA/SMSNA guidance addresses prolonged painful erections. Its psychological ED quiz items cover worry, shame, avoidance, and relational effects without assigning a mental cause.
Self-report remains shaped by stress, recall, relationship context, and self-monitoring; the questionnaire also asks about morning erections, partner impact, and urgent warning signs. Chest pain, fainting, severe breathing difficulty, sudden neurological symptoms, or an erection approaching four hours require urgent medical help.
- Raymond C. Rosen, Alan Riley, Gorm Wagner, Ian H. Osterloh, John Kirkpatrick, and Avanish Mishra. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49(6):822-830. 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00238-0
- Arthur L. Burnett, Ajay Nehra, Rodney H. Breau, Daniel J. Culkin, Martha M. Faraday, Lawrence S. Hakim, Joel Heidelbaugh, Mohit Khera, Kevin T. McVary, Martin M. Miner, Christian J. Nelson, Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad, Allen D. Seftel, and Alan W. Shindel. Erectile Dysfunction: AUA Guideline. Journal of Urology. 2018;200(3):633-641. 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.004
- Tobias S. Köhler, Robert A. Kloner, Raymond C. Rosen, Arthur L. Burnett, Michael J. Blaha, Peter Ganz, Irwin Goldstein, Noel N. Kim, Tom Lue, Kevin T. McVary, John P. Mulhall, Sharon J. Parish, Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad, Richard Sadovsky, Ira D. Sharlip, and Martin Miner. The Princeton IV Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2024;99(9):1500-1517. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.06.002
- Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Bryant K. Allen, Gerald B. Brock, Gregory A. Broderick, Roger Chou, Tobias S. Kohler, John P. Mulhall, Jeff Oristaglio, Leila L. Rahimi, Zora R. Rogers, Ryan P. Terlecki, Landon Trost, Faysal A. Yafi, and Nelson E. Bennett. The Diagnosis and Management of Recurrent Ischemic Priapism, Priapism in Sickle Cell Patients, and Non-Ischemic Priapism: An AUA/SMSNA Guideline. Journal of Urology. 2022;208(1):43-52. 10.1097/JU.0000000000002767
Updated: