What Race Am I Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
What Race Am I Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People reflecting on family stories, cultural belonging, or uncertainty about how to describe themselves can use this questionnaire to organize their thoughts. The What Race Am I Quiz reflects cultural connection, readiness to explore family history, and self-described identity; results do not determine a person's race or ethnicity. This questionnaire supports cultural identity reflection by showing which parts of your background feel meaningful, clearly articulated, or ready for further exploration.
What This Assessment Explores
The items examine cultural participation, belonging, identity language, and readiness to investigate family history. They cover traditions, celebrations, family stories, records, genealogy, DNA tools, and distinctions among race, ethnicity, nationality, and culture. When labels feel incomplete, these questions help you examine your heritage identity.
The three result dimensions are:
- Cultural Connection: 0-30 measures engagement and belonging around cultural traditions, communities, languages, and practices. Bands: Light connection (0-10), Growing connection (11-20), Strong connection (21-30).
- Family History Exploration Readiness: 0-20 measures motivation and preparedness for respectful family-history research. Bands: Just Starting (0-7), Exploring (8-14), Ready to Act (15-20).
- Identity Clarity: 0-30 measures confidence describing background, ethnicity, nationality, and community ties in your own words. Bands: Still Forming (0-10), Emerging Clarity (11-20), Clear & Confident (21-30).
Together, the dimensions show how cultural ties and identity language currently fit with your readiness for further exploration.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Response options use self-report formats such as agreement, frequency, and graded truth choices. Items are grouped by theme, and responses are summarized into the three displayed dimensions. The ranges and bands guide interpretation; the questionnaire does not state how many points each individual answer adds.
The questionnaire's focus on identity development and exploration of family history is conceptually consistent with Haydon et al.'s 2023 study. Phinney’s 1992 Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure supports the relevance of exploration and commitment in ethnic identity, while Usborne and Taylor (2010) highlight cultural identity clarity and self-concept. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with those studies, not a reproduction or validated adaptation of their instruments.
As a self-report questionnaire covering cultural connection, identity clarity, and family-history exploration, it produces results that depend on memory, self-awareness, and current circumstances. The online format has no stated norms or independent standardization, so bands are descriptive rather than clinical. Use the profile as a snapshot for deciding what to ask relatives, verify in records, or reflect on next.
- Clive G. Haydon, Brian J. Hill, Peter J. Ward, and Dennis L. Eggett (2023). Identity Development and Its Relationship to Family History Knowledge among Late Adolescents. Genealogy, 7(1), 13. 10.3390/genealogy7010013
- Jean S. Phinney (1992). The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure: A new scale for use with adolescents and young adults from diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7(2), 156-176. 10.1177/074355489272003
- Esther Usborne and Donald M. Taylor (2010). The Role of Cultural Identity Clarity for Self-Concept Clarity, Self-Esteem, and Subjective Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 883-897. 10.1177/0146167210372215
Updated: