Is He Losing Interest Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- He listens politely in the moment but rarely asks about it later.
- He often remembers details and follows up without prompting.
- He listens and sometimes follows up, depending on the subject.
- He regularly redirects the conversation or closes the topic quickly.
- He readily commits when his schedule allows, even if I raised the idea.
- He stays vague and rarely turns possibilities into actual plans.
- He proposes ideas or helps choose specific dates.
- He repeatedly avoids or declines plans without suggesting alternatives.
- He repeatedly avoids choosing a time or lets proposed plans lapse.
- He accepts a time, though I usually handle the coordination.
- He identifies a realistic time or offers an alternative that works.
- He says he is busy and leaves the timing unresolved.
Is He Losing Interest Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People noticing a change in closeness can use the Is He Losing Interest Quiz to organize observations without treating one awkward exchange as proof. It suits anyone asking whether my boyfriend is losing interest in me and wanting a grounded starting point for conversation. The profile focuses on recurring interaction patterns, helping you separate temporary pressure from a change that deserves clearer discussion.
What This Assessment Measures
The questions compare recent interactions with an established pattern, not one delayed reply. They cover news, conversation, affection, inclusion, plans, missed calls, follow-through, and discussions about change. If you wonder whether I am overthinking or he is losing interest, the result locates concern across several behaviors.
Three displayed dimensions are:
- Communication Consistency and Initiative (0-15) reflects contact and initiative: Steady Contact (0-5) is largely mutual, Mixed Contact (6-10) is uneven, and Marked Communication Shift (11-15) signals a sustained drop.
- Emotional Presence and Connection (0-15) reflects warmth and engagement: Present Connection (0-5) means presence is intact, Uneven Connection (6-10) means warmth varies, and Sustained Detachment (11-15) means disconnection recurs.
- Relationship Investment and Clarity (0-15) reflects planning, follow-through, inclusion, and direction: Visible Investment (0-5) means clear effort, Uneven Investment (6-10) means mixed signals, and Limited Investment Signals (11-15) means weak follow-through recurs.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item presents a relationship situation with four response options describing different patterns. The respondent compares recent behavior with an earlier baseline and notices follow-through over time. Scoring groups responses by dimension; higher scores represent more reported signs of reduced contact, emotional connection, or relationship clarity, not a private motive.
Guerrero et al. (1993) offers the closest conceptual link through maintenance behavior, relationship development, and disengagement. The PPRS supports attention to responsiveness and felt understanding, while Crasta et al. (2021) adds responsiveness and insensitivity. The Investment Model Scale contributes commitment and investment concepts. The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with these works, not an adaptation of them.
That framework helps when asking whether he is losing feelings, but it does not identify his private motive. The online questionnaire has no stated standardized norms or diagnostic cutoffs. Self-report can reflect memory, current emotion, expectations, and ambiguous behavior, so a person wondering whether my boyfriend has lost interest in me should compare the profile with specific examples and a direct conversation.
- Laura K. Guerrero, Sylvie V. Eloy, and Alisa I. Wabnik. (1993). Linking Maintenance Strategies to Relationship Development and Disengagement: A Reconceptualization. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 273-283. 10.1177/026540759301000207
- Dev Crasta, Ronald D. Rogge, Michael R. Maniaci, and Harry T. Reis. (2021). Toward an Optimized Measure of Perceived Partner Responsiveness: Development and Validation of the Perceived Responsiveness and Insensitivity Scale. Psychological Assessment, 33(4), 338-355. 10.1037/pas0000986
- Harry T. Reis, Dev Crasta, Ronald D. Rogge, Michael R. Maniaci, and Cheryl L. Carmichael. (2017). Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (PPRS). In The Sourcebook of Listening Research: Methodology and Measures, 516-521. Wiley. 10.1002/9781119102991.ch57
- Caryl E. Rusbult, John M. Martz, and Christopher R. Agnew. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring Commitment Level, Satisfaction Level, Quality of Alternatives, and Investment Size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357-387. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
Updated: