Is My Boss Toxic Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- They set demanding but discussable expectations and help clarify priorities.
- They occasionally set unrealistic demands but reconsider when constraints are explained.
- They repeatedly impose impossible workloads and blame me for predictable conflicts.
- They knowingly demand illegal, dangerous, or seriously harmful work under threat, even once.
- They keep expectations focused on my role and workplace conduct.
- They occasionally ask intrusive questions or offer unwanted personal direction.
- They repeatedly pressure me about relationships, appearance, beliefs, or activities outside work.
- They use job power to force personal contact, favors, secrecy, or compliance, even once.
- Firm at times, but controlled and focused on the situation.
- Occasionally sharp or impatient in a way that unsettles me.
- Frequently insulting, contemptuous, or verbally aggressive.
- They use screaming, targeted slurs, menacing gestures, or explicit threats, even if only in one incident.
Is My Boss Toxic Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
For employees trying to make sense of a manager’s conduct, the Is My Boss Toxic Quiz offers a structured way to examine behavior rather than guess at personality or intent. A toxic boss quiz can organize concerns about pressure, disrespect, unfairness, or retaliation into observable workplace patterns. The result points toward reflection, documentation, boundary-setting, or trusted support without turning a difficult relationship into a verdict about private feelings.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire is intended for employees reviewing a supervisor’s conduct through workplace situations. It covers pressure, intrusion, availability, monitoring, criticism, humiliation, disagreement, credit, leave, and retaliation. The result describes conduct patterns and impact rather than a manager’s personality or intent.
These dimensions organize the result:
- Control and Boundary Violations (0-15) measures pressure, intrusion, availability, or monitoring; bands are No indicators endorsed (0), Review the boundary (1-2), and Take action (3-15).
- Intimidating and Disrespectful Communication (0-15) measures insulting, humiliating, frightening, or threatening communication; bands are No listed indicator endorsed (0-0), Review the incident (1-2), and Take action (3-15).
- Unfair Treatment and Retaliation (0-15) measures favoritism, scapegoating, selective credit, obstruction, or punishment after concerns are raised; bands are No indicators selected (0), Review the pattern (1-2), and Take action (3-15).
As a workplace bullying questionnaire, it turns broad concern into recordable conduct.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item presents a workplace situation with four ordered response choices, moving from proportionate conduct toward repeated, coercive, or severe behavior. Answers are grouped by theme and reported as separate totals; the displayed ranges show result bands, not a documented answer-by-answer point rule. A single red-flag experience may therefore deserve attention even when a total is lower.
The Abusive Supervision Scale (Tepper, 2000) addresses sustained hostile verbal and nonverbal supervisor behavior. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that construct, not an adaptation of the scale. Mackey, Frieder, Brees, and Martinko’s 2017 review supports examining abusive supervision as a workplace behavior pattern, while the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised provides a related framework for bullying and harassment.
Read as an abusive supervision assessment, it offers thematic reflection rather than a standardized score. As an online self-report, responses can be shaped by current stress, memory, interpretation, fear of consequences, and limited context. It is an unvalidated, non-diagnostic reflective summary without established norms, so results are best used to examine incidents, records, workplace processes, and impact rather than infer whether a manager dislikes an employee.
- Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178-190. 10.5465/1556375
- Mackey, J. D., Frieder, R. E., Brees, J. R., & Martinko, M. J. (2017). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1940-1965. 10.1177/0149206315573997
- Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work & Stress, 23(1), 24-44. 10.1080/02678370902815673
Updated: