What Uni Course Should I Do Quiz
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- How learning environments or support systems can respond to different people's needs.
- How a particular programme affects participation or personal development.
- How education or community support connects with my main interest in another field.
- How to optimise a technical system without focusing on learning or support.
- Observe what blocks participation, welcome people, and adapt the process with them.
- Introduce visitors to the available activities and answer their immediate questions.
- Help with registration or another defined task behind the scenes.
- Work on the centre's finances, technology, or publicity instead.
- Tracing how an idea, style, story, or social voice changes across time and media.
- Gathering cultural examples and presenting their main themes clearly.
- Including some historical or media context in an otherwise technical project.
- Testing a physical mechanism or numerical model with minimal interpretation.
What Uni Course Should I Do Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
Students comparing several degree areas can use this profile to turn broad preferences into a practical starting point. The What Uni Course Should I Do Quiz is intended for people who want to identify subject families that deserve closer attention. It can narrow a broad choice before a university course finder quiz connects interests with specific modules and entry requirements.
What This Assessment Explores
The items sample preferences for meaning, organisations, helping, living systems, and structured problem-solving. As a uni course quiz, it maps interests rather than ability. The five displayed scales are:
- Arts, Humanities & Media (0-12) reflects creating, interpreting, and communicating meaning: Supporting interest 0-4; Active possibility 5-8; Strong affinity 9-12.
- Business, Law & Society (0-12) reflects organisations, rules, markets, policy, and social analysis: Supporting interest 0-4; Active possibility 5-8; Strong affinity 9-12.
- Education & Human Services (0-12) reflects learning, development, community support, and access: Supporting interest 0-4; Active possibility 5-8; Strong affinity 9-12.
- Health & Life Sciences (0-12) reflects living systems, health evidence, laboratories, and care: Supporting interest 0-4; Active possibility 5-8; Strong affinity 9-12.
- Science, Technology, Engineering & Built Environment (0-12) reflects evidence, systems, design, and problem-solving: Supporting interest 0-4; Active possibility 5-8; Strong affinity 9-12.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item presents a study, work, or everyday situation with four response options. Choices sample meaning, institutions, helping, health, biology, and systems. Choose the response that reflects curiosity, not prestige or usefulness.
Responses are grouped into five subject families, producing a separate 0-12 profile for each. The highest score marks strongest affinity; scores within one point indicate a blended direction. The result suggests where to investigate, not ability, career success, or course satisfaction.
For someone asking what university course should I do, this profile offers a starting point. Its framework is consistent with Smart et al. (2000) and Holland’s theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Feldman et al. (2008) adds context on major fields and college experiences, and ACT’s 2023 manual offers a broader reference for interest-inventory practice. It is a separate online questionnaire, not a standardized administration or adaptation of those instruments.
Without stated norms for this online version, results can shift with current experiences, self-awareness, and interpretation. Compare strong or blended areas with modules, assessment styles, prerequisites, and career information before choosing where to apply.
- Smart, John C., Kenneth A. Feldman, and Corinna A. Ethington. Academic Disciplines: Holland's Theory and the Study of College Students and Faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 2000.
- Feldman, Kenneth A., John C. Smart, and Corinna A. Ethington. "Using Holland's Theory to Study Patterns of College Student Success: The Impact of Major Fields on Students." In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 23, edited by John C. Smart, 329-380. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6959-8_11
- Holland, John L. Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments. 3rd ed. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1997.
- ACT. ACT Interest Inventory Technical Manual. Iowa City, IA: ACT, Inc., 2023.
Updated: