Incel Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
Incel Test - Description and methodology of the test
For people reflecting on rejection, dating expectations, or identification with online incel ideas, this questionnaire offers a structured way to examine patterns rather than force a yes-or-no label. The Incel Test is intended for readers who want to consider how distress, perceived unfairness, resentment, and entitlement shape their interpretations of romantic or sexual experiences.
What This Assessment Measures
Items address dating distress, fixed hierarchies, generalized blame, incel identification, resentment, and beliefs about owed intimacy. This incel self-assessment is best read as a profile, since one elevated area can occur alongside lower scores elsewhere.
The statements focus on rejection, comparison with couples, secrecy about dating, anger at advice, and pessimism about change. Together, scores show whether responses lean toward distress, worldview agreement, or grievance-based expectations; they do not establish a permanent identity.
The reported dimensions are:
- Dating Frustration & Hopelessness (0-30) measures persistent distress and pessimism: Low distress 0-10, Moderate distress 11-20, High distress 21-30.
- Incel Worldview Endorsement (0-40) measures hierarchy, blame, and identity alignment: Low alignment 0-13, Moderate alignment 14-26, High alignment 27-40.
- Resentment & Entitlement Beliefs (0-30) measures resentment toward others and beliefs about being owed attention, affection, or sex: Low 0-10, Moderate 11-20, High 21-30.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
The questionnaire uses four ordered options-Strongly disagree, Disagree, Not sure, and Agree-for statements about beliefs and experiences. This records degrees of endorsement rather than a binary category.
Results are reported separately for the three dimensions and compared with the displayed bands. Because the item-level scoring rule is not specified, no point value should be inferred from one answer. Across the three scales, the pattern matters more than a single identity label.
The Moskalenko survey examines how incel identity relates to radicalization and mental health, overlapping with this questionnaire’s focus on identity, hopelessness, grievance, and worldview. The study by Scaptura and Boyle addresses incel traits and violent fantasies, while the study by Grunau and colleagues examines unwanted celibacy and misogynistic attitudes after controlling for personality. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with those studies, not an adaptation of them or validated by them.
The questionnaire has no documented normative comparisons or reliability estimates; its score bands are descriptive, not clinically standardized. Descriptive self-report results may shift with mood, recent rejection, wording, or impression management, so wider circumstances and behavior remain important.
- Moskalenko, Sophia, Juncal Fernández-Garayzábal González, Naama Kates, and Jesse Morton. “Incel Ideology, Radicalization and Mental Health: A Survey Study.” The Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare, 4(3), 1-29 (2022). 10.21810/jicw.v4i3.3817
- Scaptura, Maria N., and Kaitlin M. Boyle. “Masculinity Threat, ‘Incel’ Traits, and Violent Fantasies Among Heterosexual Men in the United States.” Feminist Criminology, 15(3), 278-298 (2020). 10.1177/1557085119896415
- Grunau, Karolin, Helena E. Bieselt, Pelin Gul, and Tom R. Kupfer. “Unwanted Celibacy Is Associated with Misogynistic Attitudes Even after Controlling for Personality.” Personality and Individual Differences, 199, 111860 (2022). 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111860
Updated: