Am I Sadistic Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
Am I Sadistic Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
For readers who want to examine whether they sometimes enjoy or feel rewarded by another person’s discomfort, the Am I Sadistic Quiz offers a focused self-reflection profile. It suits people reviewing their own interpersonal behavior and helps them notice control, empathy, and repair patterns. Taking this sadism test can clarify how those tendencies appear in everyday interactions.
What This Assessment Explores
The items focus on ordinary situations involving limits, dominance, distress, consent, and repair. Together, they show how empathic responses may coexist with moments when control or provocation becomes rewarding. As a test of sadistic enjoyment, this assessment offers a profile that can guide observation of how boundary, empathy, and repair responses interact.
The three displayed dimensions are:
- Boundary-Pushing & Control (0-30) measures limit-testing, dominance, intimidation, and power plays; Cooperative & Consent-Aware (0-10), Sometimes Pushy (11-20), and Control-Driven Boundary-Pushing (21-30) mark increasing control-seeking.
- Empathy & Repair (0-30) measures concern, accountability, apology, and changed behavior; Low repair follow-through (0-10), Moderate empathy & repair (11-20), and High empathy & accountability (21-30) mark increasing repair capacity.
- Everyday Sadism (0-40) measures enjoyment of discomfort, embarrassment, or pain; Low (0-13), Moderate (14-26), and High (27-40) mark increasing sadistic enjoyment.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
The questionnaire uses first-person statements with four response choices: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Not sure, and Agree. Items ask about reactions and behavior when someone is upset, sets a boundary, or has been hurt. The profile reports the three displayed scales; its scoring method, weighting, reverse-scoring rules, and population norms are not documented. The bands are therefore this profile’s categories, not population percentiles.
Plouffe et al. (2017) offer a conceptual comparison through the ASP, while Buckels et al. (2013) connect sadistic enjoyment with behavior involving others’ distress, and O’Meara et al. (2011) offer a comparison for sadistic impulses. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with those published measures but is not presented as their adaptation, translation, or validation.
This self-report profile functions as a sadism questionnaire and is best read alongside concrete examples and later behavior. Self-report is sensitive to mood, defensiveness, memory, and self-awareness, so one profile cannot establish stable personality structure or explain why a behavior occurs. It can instead identify situations to observe, including whether empathy and repair change what follows a crossed boundary.
- Plouffe, Rachel A., Donald H. Saklofske, and Martin M. Smith. "The Assessment of Sadistic Personality: Preliminary psychometric evidence for a new measure." Personality and Individual Differences 104 (2017): 166-171. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.043
- Buckels, Erin E., Daniel N. Jones, and Delroy L. Paulhus. "Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism." Psychological Science 24, no. 11 (2013): 2201-2209. 10.1177/0956797613490749
- O'Meara, Aisling, Jason Davies, and Sean Hammond. "The psychometric properties and utility of the Short Sadistic Impulse Scale (SSIS)." Psychological Assessment 23, no. 2 (2011): 523-531. 10.1037/a0022400
Updated: