Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly

Auditory Processing Disorder Quiz

Auditory Processing Disorder Quiz - FreudlyTake a free auditory processing disorder quiz to identify symptoms of auditory processing deficits. Quick, not a diagnosis, consult a specialist. Start now.en
In 10 minutes, this auditory processing disorder quiz uses 15 questions about listening in noise, spoken instructions, sound sequences and mental effort. Your result highlights patterns across these situations, helping you reflect on everyday listening experiences and decide what concerns may merit closer attention.
Questions: 1510 minutes
Auditory Processing Disorder Quiz: situation and reply bubbles
July 22, 2026July 22, 2026Material has been updatedJuly 22, 2026Material has been published
7,584 views
682 completions
611 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
611 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Sound Detail and SequenceSDaS
This scale reflects self-reported difficulties noticing sound details and keeping track of the order of spoken information.
example score6/15
6/15Follow-up indicatedexample score
0Not endorsed
1 – 2Limited indications
3 – 15Follow-up indicated
A score of 6 falls in the Follow-up indicated range, suggesting recurring sound-detail or sequence mix-ups were endorsed on these items.
Speech in Competing SoundSiCS
This scale reflects how often you notice difficulty understanding speech when other sounds are present.
example score8/15
8/15Follow-up indicatedexample score
0Not endorsed
1 – 2Limited indications
3 – 15Follow-up indicated
A score of 8 falls in the Follow-up indicated range, suggesting you more often notice challenges understanding speech in competing sound situations in these items.
Spoken Information and Listening LoadSIaLL
Measures how often spoken instructions and verbal information feel hard to follow or require extra listening effort, especially under higher listening load.
example score10/15
10/15Follow-up indicatedexample score
0Not endorsed
1 – 2Limited indications
3 – 15Follow-up indicated
A score of 10 falls in the Follow-up indicated range, suggesting these spoken-information and listening-effort experiences are reported often enough to merit further reflection and discussion if they are impacting daily functioning.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Struggling in noisy places
44%OF USERS
People who can hear sounds but have trouble following conversations in restaurants, classrooms, meetings, or crowded rooms take it to understand what might be going on.
Missing spoken instructions
33%OF USERS
Adults or teens who often need directions repeated, mix up similar-sounding words, or lose track of multi-step instructions use it to reflect on listening and comprehension patterns.
Parents noticing listening issues
23%OF USERS
Parents or caregivers who see a child doing fine in quiet settings but struggling to process speech at school or during group activities take it as a starting point for a professional conversation.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Sound Detail and SequenceSDaS
You?
Average9
Typical rangeTypical6.5 – 11.5
Possible0 – 15
Speech in Competing SoundSiCS
You?
Average4.9
Typical rangeTypical2.8 – 7.1
Possible0 – 15
Spoken Information and Listening LoadSIaLL
You?
Average8
Typical rangeTypical5.9 – 10
Possible0 – 15
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Never; I could select the intended voice reliably.
    • Occasionally, until I focused on the speaker.
    • Often, unless the other voices stopped or became quieter.
    • Almost always, even when I could see the intended speaker.
    • Never or nearly never.
    • Occasionally, for a missed phrase.
    • Often, across several parts of a conversation.
    • Almost always, despite attentive listening.
    • Never for a list that short.
    • Occasionally, although I remembered the items themselves.
    • Often, unless I repeated the list immediately.
    • Almost always unless I wrote or saw the list.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Auditory Processing Disorder Quiz - Description and methodology of the test

People who repeatedly lose parts of conversations, confuse spoken sequences, or become unusually tired from listening may want a clearer way to organize those experiences. This auditory processing disorder quiz is intended for self-reflection by anyone noticing such patterns in daily communication. An apd quiz can show which situations are most consistently endorsed and help you decide what observations to discuss with an audiologist or doctor.

What This Assessment Explores

The assessment examines how spoken information is managed when listening becomes demanding. Its items address sound detail and order, separating a target voice from competing sound, understanding rapid or unfamiliar speech, following multi-step instructions, and sustaining comprehension as mental effort rises. The question-do I have APD?-often arises when these patterns persist, and the profile organizes observations across situations.

The result is organized into three scales:

  • Sound Detail and Sequence (0-15) reflects endorsed confusion in sound detail or order; bands are Not endorsed (0), Limited indications (1-2), and Follow-up indicated (3-15).
  • Speech in Competing Sound (0-15) reflects difficulty following a target voice amid other sound; bands are Not endorsed (0), Limited indications (1-2), and Follow-up indicated (3-15).
  • Spoken Information and Listening Load (0-15) reflects effects on instructions, comprehension, and effort; bands are Not endorsed (0), Limited indications (1-2), and Follow-up indicated (3-15).

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each item presents a listening situation with four response options, moving from no difficulty to increasingly frequent difficulty. This format organizes responses into domain totals, showing where listening problems cluster rather than reducing them to one yes-or-no answer. Interpret the result through the displayed totals and bands; no additional weighting rule is established.

The question-do I have auditory processing disorder?-is broader than unvalidated reflective summaries, which are not severity levels or clinical cutoffs and cannot identify APD. Similar experiences may reflect hearing, attention, working memory, language, anxiety, fatigue, sleep, or environmental factors.

Conceptually, the content is consistent with Obuchi and Kaga (2020), the closest source for listening in noise, sound ordering, and effort. It is not presented as an adaptation of that questionnaire. Bamiou and colleagues (2015) add context for adult hearing questionnaires, while the American Academy of Audiology (2010) describes central auditory processing concerns as requiring fuller assessment. A follow-up band can prompt professional discussion; any concerning endorsed experience matters independently of the total, and a red-flag response scored 3 overrides it. Sudden hearing changes, severe dizziness, or acute symptoms warrant prompt care.

Literature:
  • Obuchi, Chie, and Kimitaka Kaga. "Development of a questionnaire to assess listening difficulties in adults with auditory processing disorder." Hearing, Balance and Communication, 18(1), 29-35, 2020. 10.1080/21695717.2019.1663055
  • Bamiou, Doris-Eva, Vasiliki Vivian Iliadou, Sthella Zanchetta, and Chrysa Spyridakou. "What Can We Learn about Auditory Processing from Adult Hearing Questionnaires?" Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 26(10), 824-837, 2015. 10.3766/jaaa.15009
  • American Academy of Audiology. "Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Children and Adults with Central Auditory Processing Disorder." American Academy of Audiology, 2010.

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment