Abrosexual Quiz
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- The people I like have varied, but my underlying orientation has stayed fairly consistent.
- My history is mixed, and I do not yet know whether fluidity is the best explanation.
- My attraction has changed enough that fluid language helps describe it.
- Abrosexuality gives me a direct and personally meaningful way to explain those changes.
- It would add little because I view my orientation as basically stable.
- It might be one possibility, though I would first see the change as situational or person-specific.
- It could help me view the shift as part of a broader fluid pattern.
- It would let the new phase fit my identity without requiring me to treat the previous phase as mistaken.
- The strength changes, but the direction and basic pattern stay similar.
- I see a few differences, although they may reflect individual relationships rather than changing attraction.
- Either the intensity or gender focus has shifted noticeably at certain times.
- Multiple features—such as intensity, gender focus, or the presence of attraction—have differed across phases.
Abrosexual Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People questioning whether their sexual attraction changes over time can use this questionnaire to organize experience without forcing an identity label. The Abrosexual Quiz focuses on patterns that may be difficult to compare across relationships, periods, or levels of desire. Readers asking whether they are abrosexual can use this am I abrosexual questionnaire to notice which parts of the description feel personally relevant.
What This Assessment Explores
The questions examine whether attraction feels stable or moves through phases, including changes in intensity, gender focus, and periods with little or no attraction. They also ask whether flexible identity language helps describe your history. This sexual fluidity quiz is for readers reflecting on their own experience, not evaluating someone else.
The result separates three dimensions:
- Abrosexual Label Resonance (0-15) shows how useful the label feels: Limited resonance (0-5), Exploring resonance (6-10), or Strong resonance (11-15).
- Attraction Fluidity Over Time (0-15) summarizes change: Mostly consistent (0-5), Some fluidity (6-10), or Clear fluidity (11-15).
- Nature of Attraction Shifts (0-15) describes scope and form: Stable scope (0-5), Variable features (6-10), or Multi-feature shifts (11-15).
Together, the bands organize personal reflection without ranking identities or deciding which label you should use.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each question presents an attraction-history situation with four response statements, moving from relative stability toward more pronounced change or label resonance. Choosing the statement that feels closest makes the format a self-report assessment; remembered experience, present context, and interpretation of past relationships can all affect responses.
The three displayed scores are separate, but the questionnaire does not state how many points each response contributes or whether any items are reverse-scored. Read the bands as reflective summaries rather than reconstructing an undisclosed formula.
As an abrosexuality test, this questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Diamond et al. (2020), whose work distinguishes forms of sexual fluidity. Katz-Wise (2014) connects changes in attraction with orientation and identity development, while Diamond’s 2008 book provides a broader framework for fluidity over time. These sources support the concepts; the online questionnaire is not presented as an adaptation of their instruments.
Because stated norms, reliability estimates, and standardization are absent, the result describes reported experience rather than establishing orientation. Self-awareness, selective memory, response style, and current circumstances may shape the profile, so it is best read as a structured aid for reflection.
- Diamond, L. M., Alley, J., Dickenson, J., & Blair, K. L. (2020). Who Counts as Sexually Fluid? Comparing Four Different Types of Sexual Fluidity in Women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(7), 2389-2403. 10.1007/s10508-019-01565-1
- Katz-Wise, S. L. (2014). Sexual fluidity in young adult women and men: Associations with sexual orientation and sexual identity development. Psychology & Sexuality, 6(2), 189-208. 10.1080/19419899.2013.876445
- Diamond, L. M. (2008). Sexual Fluidity: Understanding Women’s Love and Desire. Harvard University Press.
Updated: