Am I Open Minded Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Consider their concern, while waiting to see whether other people report the same issue.
- Ask for examples and examine how the custom may look from their position.
- Assume the custom is reasonable because it has worked for most people so far.
- Accept that their experience is real and take time to think through what it means.
- Stop reading once its basic position becomes clear.
- Read enough to understand its strongest argument, even if I remain unconvinced.
- Look mainly for weaknesses that confirm why I disagree.
- Follow the full argument and consider what its supporters may see that I do not.
- Ask about it or look it up, often following related ideas beyond the immediate definition.
- Infer its meaning from context unless knowing it is necessary.
- Let it pass so the conversation can continue without interruption.
- Make a mental note and investigate later if it continues to seem relevant.
Am I Open Minded Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
For readers who want to examine their habits around novelty, disagreement, and uncertainty, this assessment offers a structured self-reflection profile. The Am I Open Minded Quiz suits anyone curious about how readily they investigate unfamiliar material, revise a view, or try to understand another person’s reasoning. Patterns highlighted by this open-minded quiz can guide self-reflection in learning, discussion, and everyday judgment.
What This Assessment Explores
Open-mindedness is presented as a group of related tendencies, not a yes-or-no trait. The items address unfamiliar ideas, cultural experiences, disagreement, uncertainty, factual correction, and evidence that challenges a trusted belief. They examine likely responses rather than judging whether an opinion is correct.
The three result dimensions are:
- Exploratory Curiosity (0-15) shows willingness to approach unfamiliar material: Selective Explorer (0-5), Purposeful Curiosity (6-10), or Broad Curiosity (11-15).
- Intellectual Flexibility (0-15) shows readiness to examine assumptions and revise conclusions: Anchored (0-5), Selectively Flexible (6-10), or Highly Revisable (11-15).
- Perspective Receptivity (0-15) shows willingness to understand differing experiences and values: Familiar Lens (0-5), Conditional Receptivity (6-10), or Active Perspective-Taking (11-15).
Taken together, this open mindedness test describes how you explore, reconsider, and listen; it does not measure intelligence, correctness, sociability, or automatic agreement.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each question describes an everyday situation and offers four response choices, from defending a familiar view or avoiding novelty to investigating, reconsidering, or taking another perspective. You choose the option that best matches your usual reaction, so there is no correct answer.
Responses produce three separate scores, allowing an uneven profile rather than one overall label. The questionnaire displays three result bands, while no standardization or normative reference is documented; it does not state how many points each response contributes.
Its conceptual framework is closest to the Open-Minded Cognition scale (Price et al., 2015), which treats open-minded cognition as willingness to consider alternative views and revise judgments. It is also conceptually consistent with actively open-minded thinking from Stanovich and Toplak (2019), curiosity and exploration research by Kashdan et al. (2009), and perspective-taking research by Davis (1983). These sources support the constructs; they do not make this questionnaire a validated adaptation of any one instrument.
This assessment’s intellectual-flexibility profile can prompt useful reflection, but interpretation should stay contextual. Mood, topic familiarity, trust, social pressure, and self-awareness may influence answers. Read the profile as a current self-report pattern, not a fixed identity or clinical conclusion.
- Price, Erika, Victor Ottati, Chase Wilson, and Soyeon Kim. "Open-Minded Cognition." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41, no. 11 (2015): 1488-1504. 10.1177/0146167215600528
- Stanovich, Keith E., and Maggie E. Toplak. "The Need for Intellectual Diversity in Psychological Science: Our Own Studies of Actively Open-Minded Thinking as a Case Study." Cognition 187 (2019): 156-166. 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.006
- Kashdan, Todd B., Matthew W. Gallagher, Paul J. Silvia, Beate P. Winterstein, William E. Breen, Daniel Terhar, and Michael F. Steger. "The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II: Development, Factor Structure, and Psychometrics." Journal of Research in Personality 43, no. 6 (2009): 987-998. 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.011
- Davis, Mark H. "Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44, no. 1 (1983): 113-126. 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
Updated: