Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly

Am I Open Minded Quiz

Am I Open Minded Quiz - Free Curious Openness Test - FreudlyTake a free am i open minded quiz to explore whether you are open minded and understand what it means. Quick, no sign-up needed. Start now!en
With 15 questions and a completion time of about 10 minutes, the Am I Open Minded Quiz explores how you approach unfamiliar ideas, reconsider conclusions, and engage with differing perspectives. Your result offers a practical snapshot for self-reflection in conversations, learning, and everyday decisions.
Questions: 1510 minutes
Am I Open Minded: test ticket with numbers
July 22, 2026July 22, 2026Material has been updatedJuly 22, 2026Material has been published
7,558 views
686 completions
607 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
607 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Exploratory CuriosityEC
Exploratory Curiosity reflects how readily you engage with unfamiliar ideas, subjects, cultures, and experiences without needing immediate usefulness or comfort.
example score7/15
7/15Purposeful Curiosityexample score
0 – 5Selective Explorer
6 – 10Purposeful Curiosity
11 – 15Broad Curiosity
A score of 7 suggests purposeful curiosity—you're open to exploring new topics when there’s a clear invitation, relevance, or manageable entry point.
Intellectual FlexibilityIF
This scale reflects how readily you question assumptions, tolerate uncertainty, and revise conclusions when relevant information appears.
example score4/15
4/15Anchoredexample score
0 – 5Anchored
6 – 10Selectively Flexible
11 – 15Highly Revisable
A score of 4 suggests a generally anchored style, with a preference for consistency and settled conclusions over frequent revision when new information appears.
Perspective ReceptivityPR
Perspective Receptivity measures how willing you are to understand viewpoints shaped by experiences, priorities, or values different from your own.
example score3/15
3/15Familiar Lensexample score
0 – 5Familiar Lens
6 – 10Conditional Receptivity
11 – 15Active Perspective-Taking
A score of 3 suggests you tend to interpret issues through familiar viewpoints and may engage with differing perspectives more selectively.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Self-improvement seekers
41%OF USERS
People curious about their habits of thinking take it to see how they handle new evidence, disagreement, and unfamiliar ideas.
Students and lifelong learners
34%OF USERS
Learners use it to check how receptive they are to new perspectives while studying, debating, or exploring complex topics.
Team and relationship builders
25%OF USERS
People who want smoother conversations at work or at home take it to understand how they respond when others see things differently.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Exploratory CuriosityEC
You?
Average7.4
Typical rangeTypical4.8 – 9.9
Possible0 – 15
Intellectual FlexibilityIF
You?
Average6.3
Typical rangeTypical3.7 – 8.9
Possible0 – 15
Perspective ReceptivityPR
You?
Average10.7
Typical rangeTypical8.6 – 12.7
Possible0 – 15
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Consider their concern, while waiting to see whether other people report the same issue.
    • Ask for examples and examine how the custom may look from their position.
    • Assume the custom is reasonable because it has worked for most people so far.
    • Accept that their experience is real and take time to think through what it means.
    • Stop reading once its basic position becomes clear.
    • Read enough to understand its strongest argument, even if I remain unconvinced.
    • Look mainly for weaknesses that confirm why I disagree.
    • Follow the full argument and consider what its supporters may see that I do not.
    • Ask about it or look it up, often following related ideas beyond the immediate definition.
    • Infer its meaning from context unless knowing it is necessary.
    • Let it pass so the conversation can continue without interruption.
    • Make a mental note and investigate later if it continues to seem relevant.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Am I Open Minded Quiz - Description and methodology of the test

For readers who want to examine their habits around novelty, disagreement, and uncertainty, this assessment offers a structured self-reflection profile. The Am I Open Minded Quiz suits anyone curious about how readily they investigate unfamiliar material, revise a view, or try to understand another person’s reasoning. Patterns highlighted by this open-minded quiz can guide self-reflection in learning, discussion, and everyday judgment.

What This Assessment Explores

Open-mindedness is presented as a group of related tendencies, not a yes-or-no trait. The items address unfamiliar ideas, cultural experiences, disagreement, uncertainty, factual correction, and evidence that challenges a trusted belief. They examine likely responses rather than judging whether an opinion is correct.

The three result dimensions are:

  • Exploratory Curiosity (0-15) shows willingness to approach unfamiliar material: Selective Explorer (0-5), Purposeful Curiosity (6-10), or Broad Curiosity (11-15).
  • Intellectual Flexibility (0-15) shows readiness to examine assumptions and revise conclusions: Anchored (0-5), Selectively Flexible (6-10), or Highly Revisable (11-15).
  • Perspective Receptivity (0-15) shows willingness to understand differing experiences and values: Familiar Lens (0-5), Conditional Receptivity (6-10), or Active Perspective-Taking (11-15).

Taken together, this open mindedness test describes how you explore, reconsider, and listen; it does not measure intelligence, correctness, sociability, or automatic agreement.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each question describes an everyday situation and offers four response choices, from defending a familiar view or avoiding novelty to investigating, reconsidering, or taking another perspective. You choose the option that best matches your usual reaction, so there is no correct answer.

Responses produce three separate scores, allowing an uneven profile rather than one overall label. The questionnaire displays three result bands, while no standardization or normative reference is documented; it does not state how many points each response contributes.

Its conceptual framework is closest to the Open-Minded Cognition scale (Price et al., 2015), which treats open-minded cognition as willingness to consider alternative views and revise judgments. It is also conceptually consistent with actively open-minded thinking from Stanovich and Toplak (2019), curiosity and exploration research by Kashdan et al. (2009), and perspective-taking research by Davis (1983). These sources support the constructs; they do not make this questionnaire a validated adaptation of any one instrument.

This assessment’s intellectual-flexibility profile can prompt useful reflection, but interpretation should stay contextual. Mood, topic familiarity, trust, social pressure, and self-awareness may influence answers. Read the profile as a current self-report pattern, not a fixed identity or clinical conclusion.

Literature:
  • Price, Erika, Victor Ottati, Chase Wilson, and Soyeon Kim. "Open-Minded Cognition." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41, no. 11 (2015): 1488-1504. 10.1177/0146167215600528
  • Stanovich, Keith E., and Maggie E. Toplak. "The Need for Intellectual Diversity in Psychological Science: Our Own Studies of Actively Open-Minded Thinking as a Case Study." Cognition 187 (2019): 156-166. 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.006
  • Kashdan, Todd B., Matthew W. Gallagher, Paul J. Silvia, Beate P. Winterstein, William E. Breen, Daniel Terhar, and Michael F. Steger. "The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II: Development, Factor Structure, and Psychometrics." Journal of Research in Personality 43, no. 6 (2009): 987-998. 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.011
  • Davis, Mark H. "Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44, no. 1 (1983): 113-126. 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment