What Does Your Heart Want Quiz
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Taking a small supporting role that fits easily around my current life.
- Choosing a different activity centered on relaxation and enjoyment.
- Contributing meaningfully while setting limits on how far I stretch.
- Accepting the challenge because both the growth and contribution feel significant.
- Set off somewhere unfamiliar with only the first step planned.
- Visit a favorite place and add one activity I have not tried.
- Stay near home and enjoy the comfort of my normal surroundings.
- Choose a new destination after arranging the main details in advance.
- Spend it alone on a personal interest without contacting anyone.
- Exchange a few messages with someone, then enjoy my own plans.
- Join a casual group activity with familiar or new people.
- Make time for an unhurried evening with someone close to me.
What Does Your Heart Want Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People seeking a clearer picture of what currently matters to them can use the What Does Your Heart Want Quiz as a structured pause for self-reflection. Through a quiz about what your heart desires, readers can compare competing pulls rather than force one permanent answer. The result is most useful when read as a snapshot of desired direction, not a fixed description of personality.
What This Assessment Explores
Four directions organize the profile. Scenarios link choices about relationships, novelty, calm, routines, learning, contribution, and autonomy with life direction. The questions help you consider, through this quiz, one practical question: what does your heart desire?
The displayed scales are:
- Connection (0-12) measures closeness and shared experience: Quietly Independent (0-4), Connection Matters (5-8), Relationship-Led (9-12).
- Freedom & Adventure (0-12) measures novelty, movement, flexibility, and self-direction: Selective Explorer (0-4), Open Horizon (5-8), Freedom-Led (9-12).
- Peace & Stability (0-12) measures calm, continuity, security, and sustainable pace: Comfortable With Motion (0-4), Seeking Balance (5-8), Peace-Led (9-12).
- Purpose & Growth (0-12) measures learning, contribution, and capability: Present-Focused (0-4), Growing Intention (5-8), Purpose-Led (9-12).
The profile helps answer a personal question-what does my heart desire?-without treating the answer as permanent. Several directions can matter together, so read the result as a pattern rather than a single winning trait.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each of the 16 items presents a situation with four response options. Choices cover commitments, relationships, routines, disruptions, work, home, and personal projects. Selecting the most appealing option makes the result a reflection of preference, not observed performance.
The scoring display turns selections into four totals and named bands; the ranges do not reveal a per-answer rule. Interpreting this quiz as a way to ask one question-what does my heart desire?-keeps attention on the balance among scores rather than one universal target. The displayed ranges are profile categories for this questionnaire, so interpretation stays within its pattern.
Its conceptual framework is consistent with the candidate-needs study by Sheldon and colleagues and with Deci and Ryan’s account of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Cross-cultural research by Chen and colleagues addresses differences in need strength across cultures. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with those works, not an adaptation of any one of them.
Self-report is context-sensitive: mood, recent events, social expectations, and self-awareness can influence choices. The profile from this quiz helps answer what my heart desires now, without treating the answer as permanent.
- Sheldon, Kennon M., Andrew J. Elliot, Youngmee Kim, and Tim Kasser. “What Is Satisfying About Satisfying Events? Testing 10 Candidate Psychological Needs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 80, no. 2, 2001, pp. 325-339. 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.325
- Chen, Beiwen, Maarten Vansteenkiste, Wim Beyers, Liesbet Boone, Edward L. Deci, Jolene Van der Kaap-Deeder, Bart Duriez, Willy Lens, Lennia Matos, Athanasios Mouratidis, Richard M. Ryan, Kennon M. Sheldon, Bart Soenens, Stijn Van Petegem, and Joke Verstuyf. “Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction, Need Frustration, and Need Strength Across Four Cultures.” Motivation and Emotion, vol. 39, no. 2, 2015, pp. 216-236. 10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1
- Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan. “The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior.” Psychological Inquiry, vol. 11, no. 4, 2000, pp. 227-268. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
- Maslow, A. H. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review, vol. 50, no. 4, 1943, pp. 370-396. 10.1037/h0054346
Updated: