Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
values

Compass Personality Test

Compass Personality Test: North, South, East, or West? - FreudlyCompass Personality Test: Discover your political and moral coordinates. Free multidimensional values quiz. Start now!en
Completed in about 10 minutes, the compass personality test uses 69 questions to explore how you approach empathy and principle, independence and authority, and tradition and change. Your profile can clarify recurring decision preferences, support self-reflection, and help you understand the values shaping your choices in everyday situations.
Questions: 6910 minutes
Compass Personality Test: sample question card
March 25, 2026March 25, 2026Material has been updatedMarch 25, 2026Material has been published
6,084 views
681 completion
458 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
458 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Empathy vs. PrincipleEvP
This scale gauges whether your decisions lean more toward compassion and context or toward impartial rules and fairness standards.
example score28/40
28/40Principle-ledexample score
0 – 13Empathy-led
14 – 26Balanced
27 – 40Principle-led
A score of 28 suggests you tend to prioritize consistency and fairness rules when deciding, aiming to apply principles evenly across situations.
Independence vs. AuthorityIvA
This scale reflects how much you prefer self-direction and questioning guidance versus relying on clear leadership, hierarchy, and structure.
example score19/40
19/40Balancedexample score
0 – 16More Independent
17 – 26Balanced
27 – 40More Authority-Oriented
A score of 19 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting you can work autonomously when needed while also appreciating clear roles and guidance for coordination.
Tradition vs. ChangeTvC
This scale measures your preference for established norms and continuity versus openness to novelty and reform in how you approach decisions and rules.
example score24/40
24/40Balancedexample score
0 – 13Tradition-leaning
14 – 26Balanced
27 – 40Change-leaning
A score of 24 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting you value proven approaches while remaining willing to update methods and norms when the situation calls for it.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Curious self-reflectors
41%OF USERS
People who enjoy learning what drives their choices and want a clearer picture of their values and communication style.
Couples and close friends
34%OF USERS
Partners or friends who want a neutral way to compare priorities, talk through disagreements, and understand each other’s decision habits.
Teams and managers
25%OF USERS
Work groups using it to discuss collaboration preferences, conflict approaches, and how different values show up in day-to-day decisions.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Empathy vs. PrincipleEvP
You?
Average18.4
Typical rangeTypical12.1 – 24.8
Possible0 – 40
Independence vs. AuthorityIvA
You?
Average27.4
Typical rangeTypical22 – 32.8
Possible0 – 40
Tradition vs. ChangeTvC
You?
Average13.2
Typical rangeTypical7.5 – 18.8
Possible0 – 40
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Compass Personality Test - Description and methodology of the test

values

For readers who want to understand the principles behind everyday choices, the compass personality test offers a structured way to examine decision preferences rather than assign a fixed label. Viewed as a north south east west personality test, the questionnaire helps compare reactions to fairness, leadership, established routines, and change. It can highlight value tensions that shape choices at work, in relationships, and in groups.

What This Assessment Explores

This assessment explores recurring preferences when compassion competes with consistency, self-direction with hierarchy, or familiar practice with reform. It suits people reflecting on choices at work, in relationships, or in groups. As a values and decision style test, it shows patterns rather than declaring one side universally correct.

The result dimensions are:

  • Empathy vs. Principle (0-40) measures personal impact and harmony versus impartial rules and consistent justice. Its bands are Empathy-led (0-13), Balanced (14-26), and Principle-led (27-40).
  • Independence vs. Authority (0-40) measures self-direction versus hierarchy, guidance, and coordinated leadership. Its bands are More Independent (0-16), Balanced (17-26), and More Authority-Oriented (27-40).
  • Tradition vs. Change (0-40) measures continuity and proven methods versus innovation and revised rules. Its bands are Tradition-leaning (0-13), Balanced (14-26), and Change-leaning (27-40).

Methodology and Scientific Basis

The items address rules, exceptions, leadership, approval, tradition, and new approaches. You choose Strongly disagree, Disagree, Not sure, or Agree, so the profile captures direction and uncertainty. The items group around moral judgment, authority, autonomy, continuity, and openness to change.

The displayed result presents three profile dimensions, with lower and higher positions interpreted through the definitions attached to each result. This compass personality quiz is best read as a pattern: a middle band suggests balance on a tension, while an extreme band suggests a stronger preference. No single result predicts behavior in every situation.

The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Moral Foundations Questionnaire, which links moral judgment with care, fairness, loyalty, authority, and purity. It is not an adaptation of that instrument. A second conceptual reference is Schwartz’s theory of basic individual values, where priorities can conflict between stability, autonomy, order, and openness to change.

The displayed bands provide descriptive labels rather than population norms. Results may shift with mood, recent experiences, self-awareness, and self-presentation, especially when judging fairness, authority, tradition, or change in a current situation. Use the profile as a structured starting point for reflection rather than a complete account of personality.

Literature:
  • Jesse Graham, Brian A. Nosek, Jonathan Haidt, Ravi Iyer, Spassena Koleva, and Peter H. Ditto. "Mapping the Moral Domain." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101, no. 2 (2011): 366-385. 10.1037/a0021847
  • Shalom H. Schwartz, Jan Cieciuch, Michele Vecchione, Eldad Davidov, Ronald Fischer, Constanze Beierlein, Alice Ramos, Markku Verkasalo, Jan-Erik Lönnqvist, Kursad Demirutku, Ozlem Dirilen-Gumus, and Mark Konty. "Refining the Theory of Basic Individual Values." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103, no. 4 (2012): 663-688. 10.1037/a0029393
  • Shalom H. Schwartz. "Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries." Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25 (1992): 1-65. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment