Am I Polyamorous Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
Am I Polyamorous Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People exploring whether consensual non-monogamy fits their values can use the Am I Polyamorous Quiz to examine preferences before making relationship decisions. It distinguishes interest in consensual non-monogamy from comfort with the emotional and practical demands of multiple connections; this polyamorous test examines those demands alongside jealousy, security, and negotiated agreements. The result offers a differentiated profile rather than forcing a yes-or-no identity.
What This Assessment Explores
Rather than assigning a fixed identity, the questionnaire separates relationship preference, emotional response, and practical skills. Items address multiple dating, a partner’s other connections, exclusivity, safer-sex conversations, reassurance, time, limits, and renegotiation. It suits people exploring non-monogamy or questioning whether exclusivity fits.
The questionnaire reports three dimensions, showing what the am i poly quiz assesses:
- Autonomy & Boundary Skills (0-30) measures independence, clear limits, communication, and time management. Bands: Needs support 0-12; Developing 13-21; Strong skills 22-30.
- Jealousy & Security (0-30) measures jealousy, fear of replacement, emotional security, and reassurance needs when partners have other connections. Bands: Low jealousy / high security 0-10; Moderate jealousy 11-20; High jealousy / high reassurance need 21-30.
- Monogamy-Polyamory Leaning (0-40) measures preference for exclusivity versus consensual non-monogamy, including comfort with multiple connections and negotiated agreements. Bands: Monogamy-leaning 0-16; Mixed/Flexible 17-28; Polyamory-leaning 29-40.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item uses four responses-Strongly disagree, Disagree, Not sure, and Agree-capturing degrees of endorsement rather than an identity choice. The questions group around relationship preference, jealousy and security, and boundary skills. Responses are combined into scale scores, but the questionnaire does not state how each answer converts to points, so the profile cannot be recalculated.
Conceptually, it is consistent with the Attitudes Towards Polyamory Scale, a published measure of attitudes toward consensual multi-partner relationships. Its treatment of jealousy, consent, and compersion also aligns with research on consensual non-monogamy, while research on primary and secondary relationships adds context. These sources clarify the themes; they do not make this online questionnaire a direct adaptation, validated equivalent, or standardized version.
Interpret the bands as categories, not clinical cutoffs or population norms. The profile shows which situations feel attractive, threatening, negotiable, or incompatible with your needs, while this polyamory quiz connects those reactions with relationship preferences and practical negotiation. Self-report remains sensitive to current context, imagined scenarios, honesty, and self-awareness, so results are best used to guide reflection and conversations rather than define a permanent identity.
- Johnson, S. M., Giuliano, T. A., Herselman, J. R., & Hutzler, K. T. (2015). Development of a brief measure of attitudes towards polyamory. Psychology & Sexuality, 6(4), 325-339. 10.1080/19419899.2014.1001774
- Mogilski, J. K., Reeve, S. D., Nicolas, S. C. A., Donaldson, S. H., Mitchell, V. E., & Welling, L. L. (2019). Jealousy, Consent, and Compersion Within Monogamous and Consensually Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(6), 1811-1828. 10.1007/s10508-018-1286-4
- Balzarini, R. N., Campbell, L., Kohut, T., Holmes, B. M., Lehmiller, J. J., Harman, J. J., & Atkins, N. (2017). Perceptions of primary and secondary relationships in polyamory. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0177841. 10.1371/journal.pone.0177841
Updated: