Who Will I Marry Quiz
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
Who Will I Marry Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People considering marriage or clarifying their partner preferences can use the Who Will I Marry Quiz to make implicit expectations and non-negotiables clearer before dating or committing. This self-reflection questionnaire focuses on partner preferences and relationship expectations rather than identifying a predetermined person. In this marriage compatibility quiz, compatibility means the factors you prioritize for long-term fit, not a measured match between two people.
What This Assessment Explores
As a quiz about who you may marry, the Who Will You Marry Quiz invites reflection on the qualities and conditions you want in a long-term partnership rather than predicting a particular person. Items examine communication, shared values, lifestyle fit, commitment, conflict repair, and boundaries.
Results are shown across three separate dimensions:
- Communication Preference (0-20) measures preference for direct, frequent, emotionally open contact and active conflict resolution; bands: Low Preference (0-6), Moderate Preference (7-13), High Preference (14-20).
- Compatibility Focus (0-30) measures priority given to shared values, goals, and lifestyle fit over short-term attraction; bands: Attraction-led (0-10), Balanced (11-20), Compatibility-focused (21-30).
- Dealbreaker Clarity (0-20) measures awareness of non-negotiables and ability to maintain boundaries; bands: Still Sorting Dealbreakers (0-6), Moderate Clarity (7-13), Strong Clarity (14-20).
Higher scores show stronger preferences or clearer boundaries within that dimension, not a universally better relationship style.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Methodologically, the questionnaire uses self-report statements with four response choices: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Not sure, and Agree. The prompts cover money, commitment, values, conflict, communication frequency, boundaries, and long-term responsibilities. Some items are reverse-worded, so agreement does not always point in the same scoring direction.
Individual response weights are not specified, so the displayed bands should be read as the questionnaire's own categories. The three displayed scores let you compare your preferences with your own relationship standards when considering a future spouse; they do not estimate the likelihood of meeting or marrying a particular person.
Jonason et al. (2015) provides a conceptual parallel for relationship dealbreakers, and Fletcher et al. (1999) for ideals in intimate relationships. The work by Overall and McNulty (2017) addresses constructive conflict communication; the Communication Patterns Questionnaire, discussed by Crenshaw et al. (2017), offers a parallel for communication patterns. These works do not document this questionnaire's scoring.
Self-report results can shift with current circumstances, mood, and self-awareness, so treat the result as a structured snapshot alongside real relationship behavior and broader context.
- Jonason, P. K., Garcia, J. R., Webster, G. D., Li, N. P., & Fisher, H. E. (2015). Relationship Dealbreakers: Traits People Avoid in Potential Mates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(12), 1697-1711. 10.1177/0146167215609064
- Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 72-89. 10.1037//0022-3514.76.1.72
- Overall, N. C., & McNulty, J. K. (2017). What type of communication during conflict is beneficial for intimate relationships? Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 1-5. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.002
- Crenshaw, A. O., Christensen, A., Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N. B., & Baucom, B. R. W. (2017). Revised scoring and improved reliability for the Communication Patterns Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 29(7), 913-925. 10.1037/pas0000385