Family Reunion Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Combine everything into one large folder so no file is separated from the collection
- Keep the files on the event organizer’s phone because that device is used frequently
- Organize and label the files, document sources and permissions, and maintain backup copies
- Rename every file with a number and discard the original captions to simplify sorting
- Second cousins
- First cousins
- First cousins once removed
- Aunt or uncle and niece or nephew
- First cousin once removed
- Second cousin
- Nephew
- First cousin
Family Reunion Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
For relatives preparing a gathering, the family reunion quiz offers a practical way to examine decisions that affect organization, inclusion, and family history. It suits organizers, committee members, and relatives who want to contribute thoughtfully, whether they are planning an event or helping preserve shared records. Reviewing family reunion planning can reveal principles worth considering before arrangements are finalized.
What This Assessment Explores
These scenarios assess general knowledge of inclusive reunion planning, not closeness or wellbeing. Across its planning scenarios, the assessment covers family reunion questions about records, kinship, accessibility, food, privacy, costs, attendance, and disruptions. The focus is knowledge of recommended organizing practices, not private feelings.
The result uses Family Reunion Knowledge: 0-16. It measures general knowledge of inclusive reunion planning, records, guest care, and coordination, not family relationship strength or wellbeing. Reunion Foundations (0-6) indicates basics may need review; Capable Coordinator (7-12) indicates core practices with areas to strengthen; Reunion Resource (13-16) indicates strong, well-rounded knowledge.
The scenarios form three knowledge clusters:
- Records and genealogy indicate knowledge of preservation, permissions, source awareness, and kinship.
- Welcome and guest care indicate knowledge of access, dietary needs, privacy, and fair participation.
- Coordination and contingencies indicate knowledge of budgets, RSVPs, responsibilities, weather, and oral history.
Methodology and Evidence Base
The four-option scenario-based questionnaire presents each item as a reunion situation with four possible actions. Responses reflect understanding of recommended practices rather than self-reported mood or behaviour. Topics include records, genealogy, kinship, access, food, privacy, budgets, attendance, weather, committee decisions, and oral history.
The score summarizes responses in one knowledge profile, and the result displays three bands; no separate weighting rule is stated. It can highlight family reunion preparation topics to review before invitations, menus, or venue arrangements, including records, access, food safety, privacy, and coordination.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Family Reunion Handbook (Ninkovich & Brown, 1998), which emphasizes coordinating people, information, resources, and responsibilities. Lindahl and Back (1987) connect family history with generational continuity; Rosenthal and Marshall (1988) address family ritual and generational transmission. It is a separate online assessment, not an adaptation of these works.
The questionnaire has no stated population norms or reliability estimates, so guessing, memory, and limited experience may affect performance. Read the result as a focused learning profile: it indicates general reunion knowledge, while decisions depend on context, communication, and guests’ needs.
- Ninkovich, Thomas, and Barbara E. Brown. Family Reunion Handbook: A Complete Guide for Reunion Planners. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Reunion Research, 1998. ISBN 9780961047061.
- Lindahl, Mary W., and Kurt W. Back. Lineage Identity and Generational Continuity: Family History and Family Reunions. Comprehensive Gerontology. Section B, Behavioural, Social, and Applied Sciences, 1(1) (1987): 30-34.
- Rosenthal, Carolyn J., and Victor W. Marshall. Generational Transmission of Family Ritual. American Behavioral Scientist 31(6) (1988): 669-684. 10.1177/0002764288031006006.
Updated: