Am I Nice Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- I laugh along because keeping things easy matters more than addressing it.
- I become quieter or more distant and hope they notice.
- I say that I did not enjoy the joke and ask them not to repeat it.
- I tell them it bothered me, while emphasizing that I know they may not have intended harm.
- Enter and let the doors close because another elevator will arrive soon.
- Pause only if the person signals that they want you to wait.
- Hold the door if doing so will not noticeably delay anyone.
- Hold the door and acknowledge the person so they know there is no need to rush.
- Rarely; I prefer people to remind me when a preference matters.
- Sometimes, especially when the preference affects a shared plan.
- Often, particularly with people I see regularly.
- Very often; I naturally use those details to help people feel considered.
Am I Nice Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People wanting to understand how their everyday choices affect others can use the Am I Nice Quiz for focused self-reflection. The result separates emotional attentiveness, ordinary consideration, and respectful communication rather than reducing niceness to a single virtue. Readers can use the profile as a practical how nice are you quiz, examining whether they are nice in everyday interactions and identifying specific patterns in daily relationships.
What This Assessment Explores
Everyday scenarios-teasing, interruptions, cancellations, disagreement, shared spaces, and requests for help-show how consideration appears in practice. The questions distinguish emotional attention, ordinary courtesy, and clear communication.
The result uses three displayed scales:
- Emotional Responsiveness (0-15) shows how readily you notice feelings, listen, and adjust support; Solution or Space Oriented (0-5), Selectively Responsive (6-10), and Highly Attuned (11-15) are its bands.
- Everyday Consideration (0-15) reflects attention to comfort, time, and inclusion; Independently Focused (0-5), Situationally Considerate (6-10), and Consistently Considerate (11-15) are its bands.
- Respectful Honesty and Boundaries (0-15) reflects kindness with clear expectations, truthful communication, and limits; Direct or Accommodating (0-5), Developing Balance (6-10), and Kind and Clear (11-15) are its bands.
These dimensions can vary independently, so the are you nice quiz shows habits, not moral worth, empathy, mental health, or relationship skill.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item presents a familiar interpersonal situation with four response choices. The alternatives are not right-or-wrong answers; they represent different ways of handling emotion, courtesy, disagreement, responsibility, and personal limits.
Responses are grouped into three separate dimensions. The questionnaire displays the result bands, but it does not state a universal point value for each answer, so interpretation should follow the pattern across a scale rather than one choice or an invented total.
The content is conceptually consistent with the Niceness Scale and relates to kindness research by Canter, Youngs, and Yaneva. Its treatment of clear, respectful limits also connects conceptually with the assertive-behavior approach associated with Rathus. It is not a reproduction or validated adaptation of those published instruments.
As a niceness quiz, this is a self-report snapshot with no stated standardized norms or clinical cutoffs. Current mood, self-awareness, memory, social context, and the wish to appear considerate can all influence the answers.
- Bialobrzeska, Olga. (2024). Niceness scale: Development and validation of self-reported behavioral niceness measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 218, 112480. 10.1016/j.paid.2023.112480
- Canter, David V., Donna E. Youngs, and Miroslava A. Yaneva. (2017). Towards a measure of kindness: An exploration of a neglected interpersonal trait. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 15-20. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.019
- Youngs, Donna E., Miroslava A. Yaneva, and David V. Canter. (2023). Development of a measure of kindness. Current Psychology, 42, 5428-5440. 10.1007/s12144-021-01882-6
- Rathus, Spencer A. (1973). A 30-item schedule for assessing assertive behavior. Behavior Therapy, 4(3), 398-406. 10.1016/S0005-7894(73)80120-0
Updated: