How Drunk Am I Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- They feel normal for me.
- I am a little slower or less precise than usual.
- I repeatedly mistap, drop things, or miss what I am reaching for.
- I cannot safely hold a cup or complete a simple hand task.
- My walking feels normal and steady.
- I sway slightly but do not need support.
- I stagger or need a wall or person for support.
- I cannot walk safely even with support.
- I answer clearly and accurately.
- I hesitate briefly but work it out correctly.
- I become confused or give inconsistent answers.
- I cannot identify where I am or respond coherently.
How Drunk Am I Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
For anyone who has been drinking and wants a structured check of current functioning, the How Drunk Am I Quiz focuses on observable changes that may affect immediate safety. Its symptom-based prompts address the practical concern expressed by an Am I Drunk or Tipsy Quiz, without relying on a guessed blood alcohol level. The result is intended to guide practical choices: stop drinking, involve a sober person, or seek urgent help.
What This Assessment Explores
Three areas are examined: alertness and communication, physical control, and physical warning signs. Prompts address orientation, speech, memory, wakefulness, movement, vision, nausea, breathing, skin changes, shaking, falls, fainting, and collapse. Together, they make this a drinking impairment check focused on present symptoms.
The result areas are:
- Alertness and Communication (0-15) reflects changes in attention, orientation, speech, memory, and wakefulness; bands are No listed signs 0, Concern present 1-2, and Action warranted 3-15.
- Balance and Coordination (0-15) reflects changes in walking, standing, hand control, visual tracking, and falls; bands are No listed sign selected 0, Concern present 1-2, and Action warranted 3-15.
- Physical Warning Signs (0-15) reflects nausea or vomiting, breathing, skin color or temperature, shaking, fainting, and collapse; bands are No listed signs 0, Concern present 1-2, and Urgent signs 3-15.
Any severe or red-flag response matters independently of the total.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item presents four ordered response choices, moving from no noticeable change through increasing difficulty or danger. The wording combines self-observation with information a sober person may provide, which is important when memory, speech, balance, or wakefulness has already changed. The alcohol intoxication quiz format therefore records present symptoms instead of inferring a blood alcohol concentration.
The questionnaire reports results separately by dimension, and the displayed band indicates the level of concern for that dimension. Its symptom-focused approach is conceptually consistent with the 1985 observational study by Teplin and Lutz, which used observable signs to assess intoxication; this questionnaire is not an adaptation of that study. Later work by Olson and colleagues in 2013, Volz and Boyer in 2014, and Benoit and colleagues in 2017 likewise examined observable intoxication symptoms and efforts to make their assessment more consistent.
The displayed bands are unvalidated reflective summaries rather than diagnoses, BAC estimates, or legal cutoffs; self-report may be distorted by memory gaps, minimization, or rapidly changing symptoms. Any concerning or red-flag response matters independently and can override a reassuring total.
- Teplin, Linda A., and George Lutz. “Measuring alcohol intoxication: The development, reliability and validity of an observational instrument.” Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 46(6), 459-466, 1985. DOI 10.15288/jsa.1985.46.459
- Olson, Kalen N., Stephen W. Smith, Julie S. Kloss, Jeffrey D. Ho, and Fred S. Apple. “Relationship between blood alcohol concentration and observable symptoms of intoxication in patients presenting to an emergency department.” Alcohol and Alcoholism, 48(4), 386-389, 2013. DOI 10.1093/alcalc/agt042
- Volz, Tina M., and Kimberly S. Boyer. “The development of a behaviorally-based alcohol intoxication scale.” Journal of Emergency Nursing, 40(4), 330-335, 2014. DOI 10.1016/j.jen.2013.09.008
- Benoit, Justin L., Kimberly W. Hart, Adam A. Soliman, Christopher M. Barczak, Robert S. Sibilia, Christopher J. Lindsell, and Gregory J. Fermann. “Developing a standardized measurement of alcohol intoxication.” American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 35(5), 725-730, 2017. DOI 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.009
Updated: