Am I Sexually Repressed Quiz
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Their openness makes me tense, even when the conversation is appropriate.
- I can listen without applying their choices to myself.
- I feel some discomfort but can stay curious and nonjudgmental.
- I feel that respectable people should not talk or feel that way.
- Name what is welcome, unwelcome, or still uncertain.
- Offer a simple answer and revisit it later if needed.
- Say that almost anything is fine to avoid discussing specifics.
- Feel too ashamed to answer and rely on them to decide.
- Read it and decide whether the information is useful to me.
- Save it for a private moment because the topic feels awkward.
- Skim only the least explicit sections before closing it.
- Avoid it entirely because learning about the topic feels wrong.
Am I Sexually Repressed Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People who wonder whether shame, inherited rules, or fear are narrowing their relationship with consensual sexuality may benefit from a quiz about feeling sexually repressed. Its profile separates shame-linked restriction from privacy, low desire, asexuality, or freely chosen values, while presenting situations involving desire, boundaries, and communication. The Am I Sexually Repressed Quiz focuses on tendencies rather than labels.
What This Assessment Explores
Shame or fear may shape consensual thoughts, pleasure, intimacy, boundaries, and sexual-health information; low desire itself is not what these scales interpret as repression. It does not pathologize privacy, asexuality, or freely chosen values. This sexual repression test maps tendencies, not identity or morality.
These are the three dimensions:
- Avoidance and Sexual Rigidity (0-15) measures shame- or fear-driven avoidance or inflexible rules; Flexible engagement (0-5), Situational avoidance (6-10), and Persistent constriction (11-15) mark increasing restriction.
- Internal Permission and Shame (0-15) measures guilt, self-judgment, or discomfort about consensual feelings; Comfortable permission (0-5), Mixed permission (6-10), and Constricted permission (11-15) mark increasing shame.
- Sexual Communication Inhibition (0-15) measures inhibited discussion of consensual wants, limits, and sexual-health needs; Speakable territory (0-5), Selective inhibition (6-10), and Strong inhibition (11-15) mark increasing inhibition.
Together, they distinguish shame-linked avoidance or rigidity, self-directed sexual shame, and communication inhibition.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item offers four choices about reactions to situations such as discussing preferences, pausing intimacy, noticing attraction, or raising a sexual-health concern. Choose the response matching your experience. The options move from flexible, self-accepting responses toward stronger avoidance, shame, or inhibition.
Responses produce three scores. The displayed bands are unvalidated reflections, not clinical or safety cutoffs; the questionnaire does not specify how many points each response contributes. This online self-report sexual shame questionnaire measures the three dimensions directly.
Conceptually, it is consistent with the Sexual Shame Inventory (Seebeck, 2021), which treats sexual shame as a self-report construct. It also relates to Kilimnik and Meston (2021) on sexual shame, excitation, and inhibition, and to the Sexual Self-Consciousness Scale described by van Lankveld, Geijen, and Sykora (2008). These sources support the themes but do not make this questionnaire identical to, adapted from, or validated by those instruments.
Context, self-awareness, and honest reporting can affect responses, so results may change over time and cannot establish a diagnosis or trauma history; coercion, boundary violations, or fear of harm require attention independently of the score.
- Seebeck, Jyssica. Development of the Sexual Shame Inventory. PhD dissertation, Seattle Pacific University, 2021.
- Kilimnik, Chelsea D., and Cindy M. Meston. "Sexual Shame in the Sexual Excitation and Inhibition Propensities of Men With and Without Nonconsensual Sexual Experiences." Journal of Sex Research 58, no. 2 (2021): 261-272. 10.1080/00224499.2020.1718585
- van Lankveld, Jacques J. D. M., Wendy E. H. Geijen, and Heidi Sykora. "The Sexual Self-Consciousness Scale: Psychometric Properties." Archives of Sexual Behavior 37, no. 6 (2008): 925-933. 10.1007/s10508-007-9253-5
Updated: