Will My Ex Come Back Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
Will My Ex Come Back Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People weighing contact with a former partner may use the Will My Ex Come Back Quiz to organize uncertainty around safety and change. If the concern is whether an ex may still want contact, this ex back quiz emphasizes observable openness rather than private feelings. Results separate emotional health, mutual effort, and practical signs of reconnection.
What This Assessment Explores
It examines three issues: whether renewed contact would support wellbeing, whether both people can change harmful patterns, and whether circumstances make reconciliation plausible. Items cover manipulation, disrespect, betrayal, boundaries, emotional regulation, accountability, contact, trust repair, and protecting personal needs. Considering an ex, the does my ex want me back quiz assesses healthy reconnection and observable change, not hope alone.
The result shows these dimensions:
- Move-On Health Indicator: 0-20. It reflects whether pursuing an ex seems healthy or prolongs pain; bands: Reconnect cautiously (0-7), Mixed signals (8-13), Moving on likely healthier (14-20).
- Mutual Readiness to Change: 0-30. It reflects shared willingness and follow-through; bands: Low readiness (0-10), Mixed readiness (11-20), Strong shared readiness (21-30).
- Reconnection Likelihood: 0-40. It estimates feasibility from context, timing, contact, and openness; bands: Unlikely right now (0-13), Possible with clear steps (14-27), Good prospects (28-40).
Methodology and Evidence Base
A structured self-report format asks respondents to choose Strongly disagree, Disagree, Not sure, or Agree while considering relationship history and current judgments about contact, boundaries, regulation, accountability, and willingness to repair.
Responses produce three displayed indicators with defined bands rather than one overall verdict. The weighting of individual responses is not stated, so interpret each result through its stated measure and band. Realistic reconnection is the practical question behind the will we get back together quiz.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with ATRES (Vázquez et al., 2025), a measure of attitudes toward returning to an ex-partner, but it is not a direct administration. Conceptual parallels include Dailey et al. (2020) on ambivalence and adjustment, Dailey et al. (2022) on aggression and safety, and Gordon et al. (2004) on forgiveness and return intentions in abusive relationships; these sources did not validate or provide this online questionnaire.
Self-report has no displayed norms or clinical cutoffs: current emotions, selective memory, wishful thinking, and limited knowledge of the ex can affect the profile, so behavior and sustained follow-through deserve more weight than a score alone.
- Vázquez, María Agustina, Miguel Mora-Pelegrín, María Aranda, and Beatriz Montes-Berges. 2025. "Construction and Validation of the Attitude Toward Returning to an Ex-Partner Scale." Social Sciences 14 (9): 528. 10.3390/socsci14090528
- Dailey, René M., Lingzi Zhong, Rudy Pett, and Sarah Varga. 2020. "Post-dissolution ambivalence, breakup adjustment, and relationship reconciliation." Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 37 (5): 1604-1625. 10.1177/0265407520906014
- Dailey, René M., Abigail D. Hazlett, and Chelsea Brass-Rosenfield. 2022. "The Role of Psychological and Physical Aggression In Relationship Reconciliation." Journal of Interpersonal Violence 37 (23-24): NP22066-NP22091. 10.1177/08862605211068082
- Gordon, Kristina Coop, Shacunda Burton, and Laura Porter. 2004. "Predicting the intentions of women in domestic violence shelters to return to partners: Does forgiveness play a role?" Journal of Family Psychology 18 (2): 331-338. 10.1037/0893-3200.18.2.331
Updated: