Do I Have a Crush on My Friend Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
Do I Have a Crush on My Friend Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People drawn to a friend can use the Do I Have a Crush on My Friend Quiz to organize signals without forcing a label. It is intended for personal reflection when affection, closeness, jealousy, and daydreaming overlap. The questionnaire can turn vague reactions into areas to consider when you have a crush on a friend. The result separates emotional bonding from romantic interest, giving you a clearer starting point.
What This Assessment Explores
Closeness does not automatically mean romance, so the questionnaire separates experiences that can overlap. It suits anyone considering whether a friendship feels platonic, emotionally intense, or potentially romantic. The result offers a profile rather than a single yes-or-no verdict.
The displayed scales capture these dimensions:
- Emotional Intimacy (0-30) measures emotional bonding and attachment: Casual connection (0-10), Growing closeness (11-20), Deep emotional bond (21-30).
- Jealousy & Preoccupation (0-30) measures fixation and reactions to competition: Low (0-10), Moderate (11-20), High (21-30).
- Romantic Attraction (0-30) measures romantic or physical pull: Mostly Platonic (0-10), Some Romantic Interest (11-20), Strong Crush-Like Attraction (21-30).
Together, the profile addresses the question behind this do i like my friend quiz: whether you feel romantic interest, friendship-based closeness, or a mixture. High intimacy can still describe friendship alone.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
The demonstrated statements use four response options: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Not sure, and Agree. Items sample reading into tone, imagining couple-like activities, noticing physical closeness, monitoring dating situations, replaying interactions, and wanting one-to-one time. The result presents three scale scores.
This format lets you judge each situation and compare patterns across dimensions. It can show strong closeness with little romantic pull or attraction with preoccupation, while helping sort romantic feelings for a friend.
Reeder (2000) is the closest conceptual reference because it examined attraction within cross-sex friendship. Hatfield and Sprecher's passionate-love measure helps frame intensity and preoccupation, while Aron, Aron, and Smollan's closeness model offers a conceptual reference for perceived closeness without validating this questionnaire's separation of bonding and romance. The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with these works, not a direct adaptation or validation of them.
Read scores as structured self-reflection because circumstances and honesty can influence answers; the profile has no stated diagnostic cutoff or population norm. Differing patterns matter more than one area: closeness may be high without romance, while attraction and preoccupation may rise together or diverge.
- Reeder, Heidi M. (2000). 'I Like you... as a Friend': The Role of Attraction in Cross-Sex Friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(3), 329-348. DOI 10.1177/0265407500173002
- Hatfield, Elaine, and Susan Sprecher. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 9(4), 383-410. DOI 10.1016/S0140-1971(86)80043-4
- Aron, Arthur, Elaine N. Aron, and Danny Smollan. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612. DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
Updated: