Home
Psychological tests
Cognitive Mistakes Questionnaire (CMQ)

Cognitive Mistakes Questionnaire (CMQ) Test

Understand which thinking traps may be shaping your mood and decisions in about 9 minutes. Get clear, targeted insights to guide therapy focus and track progress over time.

Start Online Test

Questions: 459 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

16719 views

1375 completions

1119 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

3/4

Catastrophizing (C)

Measures the tendency to magnify problems and anticipate the worst possible outcomes when interpreting situations.

Low

Elevated

1 – 1.8: Low | 1.9 – 4: Elevated

A score of 3 falls in the Elevated range, suggesting a stronger-than-average tendency to interpret difficulties as likely to lead to severe negative outcomes.

example score

2/4

Hypernormativity (H)

Measures the tendency to rigidly follow social norms and rules without critically evaluating their relevance or flexibility across situations.

Low

Elevated

1 – 2.5: Low | 2.6 – 4: Elevated

A score of 2 falls in the Low range, suggesting generally flexible use of social norms with limited rigid rule-following.

example score

3/4

Perfectionism (P)

Measures the tendency toward all-or-nothing, perfectionistic judgments and unrealistic standards for oneself or others.

Low

Elevated

1 – 1.8: Low | 1.81 – 4: Elevated

A score of 3 falls in the Elevated range, suggesting a noticeable pattern of perfectionistic, extreme standards that may amplify dissatisfaction when outcomes are less than ideal.

example score

3/4

Learned Helplessness (LH)

Assesses the tendency to devalue one’s own abilities and respond to setbacks with passivity and reduced personal responsibility.

Low

Elevated

1 – 1.7: Low | 1.8 – 4: Elevated

A score of 3 falls in the Elevated range, suggesting a stronger tendency toward pessimistic expectations, reduced self-efficacy, and withdrawal of effort after difficulties.

example score

3/4

Moralizing (M)

Measures the tendency to interpret people and events through moral judgments and a desire for moral control over others.

Low

High

1 – 2.6: Low | 2.7 – 4: High

A score of 3 falls in the High range, suggesting moral evaluations may frequently shape your interpretations and could add tension in relationships through increased criticism.

example score

2/4

Stubbornness (S)

Measures the tendency to defend self-esteem rigidly and remain inflexible in judgments, often arguing on principle and discounting alternative viewpoints.

Low

High

1 – 2.4: Low | 2.5 – 4: High

A score of 2 falls in the Low range, suggesting generally flexible thinking with only occasional principled defensiveness or stubborn insistence.

example score

3/4

Mind Reading (MR)

Measures the tendency to assume what others think or intend without sufficient evidence.

Low

Elevated

1 – 1.8: Low | 1.8 – 4: Elevated

A score of 3 indicates an elevated tendency to interpret others’ thoughts or intentions without clear evidence, which may contribute to negatively biased judgments.

example score

2/4

Personalization (P)

Measures the tendency to interpret others’ disagreement or neutral reactions as personally hostile, rejecting, or humiliating toward oneself.

Low

Elevated

1 – 1.2: Low | 1.3 – 4: Elevated

A score of 2 falls in the Elevated range, suggesting a noticeable tendency to take others’ reactions personally and anticipate negative attitudes toward oneself.

example score

3/4

Catastrophizing (C)

Measures the tendency to overestimate threats and perceive situations as more dangerous than they are, leading to excessive caution and avoidance.

Low

Moderate

High

1 – 1.9: Low | 2 – 2.9: Moderate | 3 – 4: High

A score of 3 indicates a high tendency to exaggerate danger, so risks and responsibilities may feel more threatening than warranted and prompt avoidant choices.

example score

139/180

Cognitive Errors Scale (CES)

Measures the overall intensity of maladaptive cognitive distortions that can bias interpretation of situations and influence emotional responses.

Low

High

45 – 93: Low | 94 – 180: High

A score of 139 falls in the High range, indicating a pronounced tendency toward cognitive distortions that may amplify negative interpretations of events.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Anxiety and low mood

41%OF USERS

People who feel anxious, down, or overwhelmed and want to see which thinking patterns may be intensifying their emotions.

Therapy starters and trackers

34%OF USERS

Clients in cognitive-behavioral therapy who use the questionnaire to identify core distortions and monitor changes over time.

Self-reflection and decisions

25%OF USERS

Individuals curious about their judgment style who want a quick check for common mental shortcuts affecting daily choices and relationships.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Catastrophizing (C)

Average

2.9

Normal range

2.4 — 3.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Hypernormality (H)

Average

2.3

Normal range

1.7 — 2.8

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Maximalism (M)

Average

1.9

Normal range

1.5 — 2.3

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Learned Helplessness (LH)

Average

2.9

Normal range

2.3 — 3.4

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Moralizing (M)

Average

2.5

Normal range

2 — 3

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Stubbornness (S)

Average

2.7

Normal range

2.3 — 3

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Mind Reading (MR)

Average

2.1

Normal range

1.7 — 2.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Personalization (P)

Average

3.1

Normal range

2.7 — 3.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Exaggerating Danger (ED)

Average

2.7

Normal range

2.1 — 3.2

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Cognitive Distortions Scale (CDS)

Average

79.3

Normal range

55 — 103.6

min.

max.

180

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It screens for common cognitive distortions that can bias how situations are interpreted. Results help identify thinking patterns often linked to anxiety or depressive symptoms.

Who is it intended for?

It is suitable for adults as a brief self-report screening tool and for clinical use in anxiety-depressive presentations. It is not designed to provide a standalone diagnosis.

How long does it take and what is the format?

It includes 45 items and typically takes about 9 minutes to complete. Items present statements reflecting specific thinking errors and require selecting the response that best fits.

How are results interpreted?

Scores indicate which types of thinking errors are most prominent and their relative intensity. Interpretation should consider established cutoffs and clinical context.

How should responses be chosen for accuracy?

Select answers based on typical reactions over a recent period rather than rare events. Avoid overthinking individual items and use the first response that fits most often.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Cognitive Errors Questionnaire, CMQ Test

Cognitive Mistakes Questionnaire (CMQ) Test

cognitive therapy cognitive distortions cbt

This questionnaire is designed to assess common cognitive distortions that may influence how an individual interprets situations and responds emotionally. The Cognitive Mistakes Questionnaire (CMQ) is typically used to identify patterns of biased or inaccurate thinking that can be clinically relevant in presentations involving anxiety and depressive symptoms.

It consists of 45 items and generally takes about 9 minutes to complete. Results are usually interpreted as an index of the types and relative prominence of cognitive errors endorsed, and may be used to inform case formulation and treatment planning, as well as to monitor change over time. The Cognitive Mistakes Questionnaire (CMQ) was originally described by A. Freeman and R. DeWolf (1992).

Author: aaron-t-beck, david-a-clark

Literature: Beck, J. S. Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond. Guilford Press. 2011.; Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders: Science and practice. Guilford Press. 2010.

Test Question Form