Cyber-Aggression Typology Questionnaire (CATQ) Test

Understand a teen’s cyberaggression style and self-control in about 5 minutes. Fast 23-item screen that guides targeted support, counseling, and prevention planning.
Start Online Test
Questions235 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
25487 views
3283 completions
2695 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
48/92
Cyberaggression Expression Index (CEI)
Measures the respondent’s overall tendency to display aggressive behavior in online interactions (higher scores indicate lower cyberaggression).
Higher cyberaggression
Moderate cyberaggression
Lower cyberaggression
2345Higher cyberaggression4669Moderate cyberaggression7092Lower cyberaggression
A score of 48 falls in the Moderate cyberaggression range, suggesting a mid-level overall tendency toward online aggressive behavior with neither consistently high nor consistently low expression.
example score
21/24
Impulsive Reactive (IR)
Measures how strongly a person tends to respond with spontaneous, emotionally driven retaliatory aggression to online provocation.
Low
Moderate
High
69Low109.5Moderate9.624High
A score of 21 falls in the High range, suggesting a pronounced tendency toward quick, emotion-triggered retaliatory cyberaggressive reactions when provoked online.
example score
14/24
Deliberate Retaliatory (DR)
Measures the tendency to engage in controlled, conscious retaliatory cyberaggression in response to negative emotions triggered by others online.
Low
Moderate
610Low1124Moderate
A score of 14 falls in the Moderate range, indicating a noticeable tendency toward controlled retaliatory aggressive responses in online interactions.
example score
11/24
Deliberate-Initiated (D)
Measures the degree of deliberate, proactive cyberaggressive behavior used to pursue desired outcomes (e.g., rewards or status).
Low
Moderate to high
69Low1024Moderate to high
A score of 11 falls in the Moderate to high range, suggesting a noticeable tendency toward intentional, proactive cyberaggressive actions aimed at achieving personal goals.
example score
17/20
Impulsive-Initiative (I)
Measures how strongly a person tends to engage in spontaneous, entertainment-driven online aggression without considering longer-term consequences.
Low
Moderate
High
57Low815Moderate1620High
A score of 17 falls in the High range, indicating a pronounced tendency toward sudden, unplanned cyberaggressive acts driven by immediate reaction or amusement.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
School psychologists and counselors
41%OF USERS
Use it to quickly classify a teen’s online aggressive behavior and plan targeted support or prevention.
Teachers and school admins
34%OF USERS
Take it to better understand and respond to cyberbullying incidents and classroom conflict dynamics.
Parents of teenagers
25%OF USERS
Use it to make sense of a child’s online outbursts and decide what kind of emotional and behavioral help is needed.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Indicator of Cyberaggression Manifestation (IoCM)
Average
62.4
Normal range
5371.9
min.
23
max.
92
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
impulse-response (i)
Average
18.7
Normal range
15.522
min.
6
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
free-response (f)
Average
17.1
Normal range
14.919.3
min.
6
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
arbitrary-initiative (a)
Average
19
Normal range
16.321.6
min.
6
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
impulsive-initiative (i)
Average
12.2
Normal range
9.914.5
min.
5
max.
20
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It assesses patterns of aggressive behavior carried out through digital communication. It distinguishes four types based on whether aggression is impulsive or deliberate and whether it is reactive or initiated.
Who is the questionnaire intended for?
It is designed for use with teenagers in school, counseling, or research settings. It supports screening and case formulation when cyberaggressive behavior is a concern.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Completion typically takes about 5 minutes. The questionnaire includes 23 items.
How should responses be selected?
Select the option that best matches typical behavior rather than a single recent incident. Answer all items; do not spend excessive time on any one item.
How are results interpreted and used?
Results indicate relative endorsement of four cyberaggression types and provide an index of self-control versus impulsivity. Findings can guide prevention planning and targeted skills work, but they are not a stand-alone diagnosis.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Typology of Cyber Aggression, CATQ Test

Cyber-Aggression Typology Questionnaire (CATQ) Test

This questionnaire is designed to assess patterns of online aggressive behavior and related motivations. The Cyber-Aggression Typology Questionnaire (CATQ) provides a brief, self-report screening approach to characterizing how individuals may engage in cyber-aggression. It is attributed to Craig A. Anderson and Brad J. Bushman.

The measure includes 23 items and typically takes about 5 minutes to complete. Items are intended to differentiate reactive versus proactive expressions of cyber-aggression and to capture whether behavior is more impulsive or more deliberative, which may inform case formulation, prevention planning, and research. The Cyber-Aggression Typology Questionnaire (CATQ) may be used in school, outpatient, or community settings as part of a broader assessment; results should be interpreted alongside clinical interview data, collateral information, and consideration of contextual and developmental factors.

Author: Brad J. Bushman, Craig A. Anderson
Literature: Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin. 2014.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Cyberaggression Questionnaire (CYBA)
This measure is designed to assess self-reported cyberaggressive behaviors…
Start Test
Child Subjective Self-Regulation Typology
This measure is designed to support a brief clinical impression of a child’…
Start Test
Management Typology Assessment
When working with teams and projects, it can be useful to clarify how a per…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment