Success and Failure Explanatory Style Questionnaire Test

Learn how you explain wins and setbacks in work and relationships, and how optimistic and in control you feel in about 9 minutes. Get focused, actionable results to strengthen motivation, confidence, and coping.
Start Online Test
Questions489 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
21682 views
2567 completions
2116 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
102/120
Interpersonal Optimism (IO)
Measures how positively and constructively a person explains successes and failures in relationships with others.
Lower optimism
Moderate optimism
Higher optimism
2075Lower optimism7696Moderate optimism97120Higher optimism
A score of 102 falls in the Higher optimism range, suggesting a generally positive and constructive explanatory style in interpersonal situations.
example score
63/168
Optimism in Achievement Situations (OiAS)
Measures how strongly a person tends to explain achievement successes by internal, stable causes that support confidence and persistence toward goals.
Low optimism
Moderate optimism
High optimism
28110Low optimism111138Moderate optimism139168High optimism
A score of 63 falls in the Low optimism range, suggesting the person less often attributes achievements to their own stable qualities, which may be linked to reduced confidence and persistence in goal pursuit.
example score
111/168
Optimism in Failure Situations (OiFS)
Measures how optimistically a person explains failures as temporary, specific, and potentially controllable rather than pervasive and fixed.
Low optimism
Moderate optimism
High optimism
28104Low optimism105133Moderate optimism134168High optimism
A score of 111 falls in the Moderate optimism range, suggesting a generally resilient but not consistently stable tendency to view failures as limited and manageable.
example score
63/120
Optimism in Success Situations (OiSS)
Measures how strongly a person explains successes through internal, stable, and broadly applicable causes (optimistic attribution in success situations).
Lower optimism
Moderate optimism
Higher optimism
2079Lower optimism80105Moderate optimism106120Higher optimism
A score of 63 falls in the Lower optimism range, suggesting successes are less consistently attributed to stable, personal, and generalizable factors.
example score
83/108
Control (C)
Measures how strongly a person believes they can influence the causes and outcomes of successes and failures.
Low control
Moderate control
High control
1865Low control6688Moderate control89108High control
A score of 83 indicates a moderately strong sense of control, suggesting the person often feels their actions can affect outcomes but may see some situations as outside their influence.
example score
77/96
Globality (G)
Globality measures whether a person explains successes and failures as broadly affecting many life areas or as limited to a specific situation.
Local
Moderate
Global
1662Local6382Moderate8396Global
A score of 77 indicates a moderately global explanatory style, meaning events are often interpreted as extending beyond the immediate situation but not consistently across all areas of life.
example score
38/84
Stability (S)
The Stability parameter measures whether you tend to explain successes and failures as caused by factors that are enduring over time or temporary and changeable.
More changeable
Mixed stability
More stable
1453More changeable5469Mixed stability7084More stable
A score of 38 falls in the More changeable range, suggesting you more often see the causes of events as temporary rather than lasting.
example score
143/288
Overall Optimism (OO)
Measures the extent to which a person tends to explain successes and failures in an overall optimistic versus pessimistic way.
Low optimism
Moderate optimism
High optimism
48189Low optimism190232Moderate optimism233288High optimism
A score of 143 falls in the Low optimism range, suggesting a more pessimistic attributional style overall when interpreting life events.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
People in self-development
41%OF USERS
They want to understand how their optimism and sense of control shape motivation after wins and setbacks.
Clients in counseling
34%OF USERS
They take it to pinpoint unhelpful explanations for failures and build a more constructive way to interpret events.
Teens and their parents
25%OF USERS
They use it to see how a teenager explains school and relationship outcomes and where support is most needed.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Optimism in Interpersonal Situations (OiIS)
Average
79.4
Normal range
64.993.9
min.
20
max.
120
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Optimism in achievement situations (Oias)
Average
102
Normal range
77.4126.7
min.
28
max.
168
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Optimism in situations of failure (Oisof)
Average
120.3
Normal range
102.4138.2
min.
28
max.
168
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Optimism in Situations of Success (OiSoS)
Average
62.2
Normal range
48.775.6
min.
20
max.
120
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Control Parameter (CP)
Average
56
Normal range
40.571.6
min.
18
max.
108
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Globality parameter (Gp)
Average
55
Normal range
43.366.6
min.
16
max.
96
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Stability parameter (Sp)
Average
37
Normal range
23.850.2
min.
14
max.
84
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Overall Optimism Score (OOS)
Average
112.1
Normal range
77.6146.7
min.
48
max.
288
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It assesses how successes and failures are explained, focusing on optimism and perceived control over outcomes. It distinguishes between positive and negative events and compares goal-related and relationship-related contexts.
How is perceived control evaluated?
Items ask whether the cause of an outcome is viewed as changeable through personal actions versus not changeable. Scores reflect how strongly outcomes are seen as controllable in different types of situations.
What is the structure of the questionnaire?
It contains 48 items covering positive and negative situations in achievement and interpersonal domains. Completion typically takes about 9 minutes.
Are there different forms for different age groups?
Yes, there is an adult form and a teenager form with age-appropriate situations. A brief version is available for quick screening and does not include the perceived control component.
How should the results be used?
Results support case formulation by identifying where explanations are more optimistic or pessimistic and where control is perceived as low or high. They can guide interventions aimed at reframing interpretations and strengthening active coping.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
The style of explaining successes and failures, STONE Test

Success and Failure Explanatory Style Questionnaire Test

This self-report measure assesses how individuals explain the causes of positive and negative outcomes, including perceived optimism and perceived control over events. The Success and Failure Explanatory Style Questionnaire is intended to characterize explanatory style patterns that may inform case formulation and treatment planning. It is commonly used in clinical and research contexts to examine attributional tendencies related to achievement and interpersonal situations.

The instrument consists of 48 items and typically takes about 9 minutes to complete. Item content samples explanations for success and failure across contexts, supporting interpretation of how respondents attribute outcomes and how controllable they perceive contributing factors to be. The Success and Failure Explanatory Style Questionnaire is attributed to C. S. Dweck, B. Weiner, and M. E. P. Seligman.

Author: B. Weiner, C. S. Dweck, M. E. P. Seligman
Literature: Peterson, C., Semmel, A., von Baeyer, C., Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Seligman, M. E. P. The attributional style questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1982.; Reivich, K., & Shatté, A. The resilience factor. Broadway Books. 2002.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Achievement Motivation and Fear of Failure Scale
This brief self-report measure assesses individual differences in achieveme…
Start Test
Attributional Style for Successes and Failures Questionnaire (STONE-10)
This questionnaire assesses how individuals explain positive and negative l…
Start Test
Optimistic Explanatory Style Scale
This self-report measure assesses individual differences in explanatory sty…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment