Prices
Tests
FAQ
How sessions work
en
es
Log inSign up

Social Interaction Competence Assessment Scale Test

Understand how you handle tough social situations and solve interpersonal problems in about 6 minutes. 30 quick items pinpoint strengths and gaps to guide targeted coaching, training, or support.
Start Online Test
Questions: 306 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
22061 view
2332 completions
2050 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
57/100
Personal-Creative Style (PS)
Measures how effectively a person uses a personal, creative approach to build trust and resolve difficulties in informal relationships.
Limited
Developing
Strong
0 – 39: Limited | 40 – 69: Developing | 70 – 100: Strong
A score of 57 falls in the Developing range, suggesting a generally workable personal-creative style in informal relationships with room to apply it more consistently across situations.
example score
50/100
Normative/Stereotypical (N)
Measures the extent to which a person relies on familiar, normative interaction patterns in informal relationships rather than more individualized approaches.
Flexible/Individualized
Balanced Normative Use
Highly Stereotypical
0 – 33: Flexible/Individualized | 34 – 66: Balanced Normative Use | 67 – 100: Highly Stereotypical
A score of 50 suggests a moderate tendency to use familiar social scripts in informal settings, generally supporting smooth interaction while allowing some flexibility for more personal connection.
example score
61/100
Counterproductive (C)
Measures the degree to which a person’s communication style in informal relationships tends to create obstacles to trust, harmony, and effective problem resolution.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 33: Low | 34 – 66: Moderate | 67 – 100: High
A score of 61 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting occasional patterns in informal interactions that may complicate building trusting, harmonious personal connections.
example score
82/100
Personal-Creative Style (PS)
Measures how creatively and individually a person adapts their communication style to solve challenges within formal or official relationships.
Conventional
Adaptive
Personal-creative
0 – 49: Conventional | 50 – 74: Adaptive | 75 – 100: Personal-creative
A score of 82 falls in the Personal-creative range, suggesting a strong tendency to use flexible, individualized, and sometimes unconventional approaches in formal interactions.
example score
49/100
Normative/Stereotyped (N)
Measures the tendency to rely on established rules and stereotypical norms when interacting in formal relationships.
Flexible / less rule-bound
Balanced
Strongly normative
0 – 33: Flexible / less rule-bound | 34 – 66: Balanced | 67 – 100: Strongly normative
A score of 49 suggests a balanced use of formal norms, combining adherence to rules with some situational flexibility.
example score
59/100
Counterproductive (C)
Measures the tendency toward ineffective or strained behavior in formal or business interactions that can impede goal achievement.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 33: Low | 34 – 66: Moderate | 67 – 100: High
A score of 59 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting occasional counterproductive patterns in formal interactions that may sometimes complicate cooperation or task progress.
example score
46/100
Personal-Creative (P)
Measures how flexibly and creatively a person approaches social interactions to solve interpersonal challenges and build relationships.
Developing
Moderate
Strong
0 – 39: Developing | 40 – 69: Moderate | 70 – 100: Strong
A score of 46 indicates a moderate personal-creative style, suggesting some flexibility and originality in social situations with room to expand the range of adaptive interaction strategies.
example score
17/100
Normative/Stereotypical (N)
Measures the extent to which a person relies on commonly accepted social norms and stereotyped behavior patterns when handling interpersonal situations.
Low normative reliance
Moderate normative reliance
High normative reliance
0 – 33: Low normative reliance | 34 – 66: Moderate normative reliance | 67 – 100: High normative reliance
A score of 17 indicates low reliance on stereotypical social norms, suggesting a tendency to use less conventional or more individually adapted interaction strategies.
example score
39/100
Counterproductive (C)
Measures the degree to which a person tends to use ineffective or potentially destructive strategies during social interactions.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 33: Low | 34 – 66: Moderate | 67 – 100: High
A score of 39 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting occasional counterproductive reactions in communication that may reduce effectiveness in some challenging situations.
example score
23/60
Social Interaction Competence Level (SICL)
Measures how effectively a person adapts and responds to challenging social situations using flexible communication strategies.
Basic
Developing
Personal-creative
15 – 37: Basic | 38 – 42: Developing | 43 – 60: Personal-creative
A score of 23 falls in the Basic range, suggesting social interaction strategies are more limited and may be less flexible across different contexts.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Team leaders and managers
41%OF USERS
They use it to gauge how effectively they handle workplace conversations, conflict, and collaboration under pressure.
Students and young adults
33%OF USERS
They take it to understand how they come across in new groups and build communication skills for study, internships, and friendships.
Counseling and therapy clients
26%OF USERS
They complete it to identify social situations that feel difficult and pinpoint practical areas to practice and improve.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Personal and Creative (Informal Relationships Sphere) (PaC(RS)
Average
25.3
Normal range
12.1 — 38.5
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Normative/Stereotypical (Sphere of Informal Relationships) (N(oIR)
Average
61.8
Normal range
46.4 — 77.2
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Counterproductive (Informal Relationships Sphere) (C(RS)
Average
45.3
Normal range
28.3 — 62.4
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Personal-Creative (Sphere of Formal Relationships) (P(oFR)
Average
25.6
Normal range
12.1 — 39.2
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Normative/Stereotypical (Sphere of Formal Relationships) (N(oFR)
Average
44.7
Normal range
30.4 — 58.9
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Counterproductive (Field of Formal Relationships) (C(oFR)
Average
36.7
Normal range
18 — 55.4
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Personal-Creative (P)
Average
29
Normal range
13.1 — 44.9
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Normative/stereotypical (N)
Average
26.1
Normal range
7.7 — 44.6
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Counterproductive (C)
Average
32.3
Normal range
13.9 — 50.6
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Level of social interaction competence (Losic)
Average
48.4
Normal range
42 — 54.9
min.
15
max.
60
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Start Online Test
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”
— Emma C., US
“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”
— Mateo R., CA
“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”
— Caroline F., US
“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”
— Klara N., CZ
“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”
— Bruno M., BR
“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”
— Alice B., FR
“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”
— Daniel W., DE
“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”
— Sofia M., ES
“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”
— Adir B., IL
“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”
— Olivia W., CA
“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”
— Grace O., IE
“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”
— Carla T., TT
“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”
— Jade H., US
“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”
— Brooke S., US
“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”
— Ryan M., US
“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”
— Lucas W., US
“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”
— Ethan C., US
“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”
— Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It measures competence in handling common social interaction challenges, including flexibility, problem solving, and adaptation of communication behavior.
What is the format of the items?
Items present short social scenarios with several response options. One option is selected as the most effective way to respond.
How long does it take to complete and how many items are included?
Completion typically takes about 6 minutes. The assessment includes 30 items.
How should responses be selected?
Select the option that best matches what would most likely be done in that situation. Answer all items using the same perspective throughout.
How are results used?
Results summarize strengths and likely difficulty areas in social interaction. They can guide communication skills training, team support, or behavioral intervention planning.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Social Interaction Competence Assessment Scale Test

Social Interaction Competence Assessment Scale Test

social competencesocial intelligence

This measure is designed to support a brief appraisal of social-interaction skills in context. The Social Interaction Competence Assessment Scale presents respondents with interpersonal situations and asks them to indicate how they would typically respond, allowing clinicians to characterize perceived effectiveness and adaptability in social problem-solving.

The instrument includes 30 items and typically requires about 6 minutes to complete. It may be used as part of a broader assessment to identify relative strengths and areas that could benefit from skills development or targeted intervention, with results interpreted alongside clinical history and other data sources.

The Social Interaction Competence Assessment Scale is attributed to Ronald E. Riggio and is intended for use in educational, organizational, or clinical settings where social functioning and interpersonal competence are relevant to case formulation or treatment planning.

Author: Ronald E. Riggio
Literature: Riggio, R. E. Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Interaction Style
This brief self-report measure is designed to characterize an individual’s…
Start Test
Interaction Tactics Questionnaire
This measure is designed to assess typical interpersonal approaches in situ…
Start Test
Social Interaction Self-Statement Test (SISST)
This measure is designed to assess self-statements that occur during social…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment